Sikh Beheaded By Indian Soldier For Views on Kashmir & Khalistan

[jkvlondon]

1 hour ago, jashb said:

1. Trying to judge which out of a hindu or a muslim is telling less untruths is a futile exercise.
 

The paedophile cult are instructed to lie to kaffirs by the koran in al-taqiyya and al-kitman. The cow ape cult are instructed to lie to ashoots by the hermaphrodite in the gita. Not much to separate them so far in this respect.

What you get with pakistani muslims is an especially messed up breed of the worst of both. They are converted hindus raped by invaders into islam at the point of the sword.

Their reverence for their genociders speaks of stockholm syndrome for their oppressors. They converted in name to save their lives at a time when hindus were being slaughtered and conversion would guarantee survival. That (fake conversion for survival) is a distinctly hindu trait.

They already had the principle of deceit from hinduism when they bowed down to the paedophile. But when they did that they also got the koran which explicitly instructs them to lie. So they now have the worst of both worlds. It is not for no reason that pakistanis are hated the world over.

Therefore whereas you would ordinarily suspect that the pakistani version is equally full of b.s. as the indian media, the problem here is that such a murder of a Sikh soldier by his indian colleague in his army barracks would not be without precedent.

 

 

 

2. At the end of the day, that's not my point anyway. The point is why Sikhs should continue to defend india. It's not our fight. You wouldn't get involved to sort out a fight between two drunkards on the road, why should Sikhs get involved to sort out this fight that is none of our business? I don't see any kutchee gujarati or south indian fighting. I thought they were hardcore indian hindu?

Why should we lose more of our few fighting men for an aghirtghan backstabbing people that call us terrorists, traitors and "worse than muslims" while they sit on their fat backsides getting rich in their kiryana shops? Let them go to the border and fight the pakistanis themselves.

Hindus are always telling us they don't need us to defend them anymore. Why not put them to the test?

 

The other day I was told by a gujrati lady quite proudly that their people don't enlist EVER because they are business people first and foremost . (to which I was lost for words but not really , They are good at chanakya challs  and cowardice except when attacking in gangs on unarmed people)

[jashb]

20 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

The other day I was told by a gujrati lady quite proudly that their people don't enlist EVER because they are business people first and foremost . (to which I was lost for words but not really , They are good at chanakya challs  and cowardice except when attacking in gangs on unarmed people)

That first line says it all. I doubt you'll ever hear a more brazen and defiant admission of guilt than that. When they all know Sikhs dominate the border defence positions, if she said something like that to you I think she was rubbing your nose in it as well.

If hardcore flag-waving indian hindus are so mercenary they can't put their lives on the line for their own religion, why do our own rush to their defence, only to come back dead in a box to a population that couldn't care less and will continue anyway to steal our water, kill us off with drugs/cancer, subvert our religion, turn us into a minority in our own homeland, and then still call US terrorists and traitors for asking for our rights?