Jump to content

Pattaka Kabit about Bhai Ranjit Singh Dhadhrianwale by Kamalroop Singh


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote: 

ਪਟਾਕਾ ਕਬਿੱਤ

ਭਾਈ ਰਣਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਝੂਠ ਕੌ ਬਣਾ ਕੇ ਸਾਚ, ਭੋਲੀ ਭਾਲੀ ਸੰਗਤ ਕੋ ਪੁੱਠੇ ਰਾਹਿ ਪਾਵਤਾ॥
ਤੇਗ ਕੇ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਸੋ ਹਿੰਦ ਕੀ ਹੈ ਚਾਦਰ ਜੋ; ਕੀਆ ਨਾਹੀ ਤੱਪ ਭੋਰੇ, ਬੈਣ ਰਹੇ ਗਾਵਤਾ॥
ਮਹਿੰਗਾ ਗਿਰੰਥ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਕਵੀ ਸੰਤੋਖ ਸਿੰਘ; ਸੂਰਜ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ ਕੋ ਭੀ ਝੂਠ ਹੀ ਬਤਾਵਤਾ॥
ਅਸੰਤ ਏਹ ਢੱਡਰੀ ਕਾ ਪੜ੍ਹਿਆ ਕੀਤੋਂ ਭੀ ਨਾਹੀਂ, ਖਾਲਸੇ ਮੇ ਨਿੱਤ ਰੋਜ ਵਾਦ ਹੈ ਵਧਾਵਤਾ॥

ਚਉਪਈ॥

ਕਹੇ ਇਤਹਾਸ ਬੰਦਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਲਿਖਿਆ॥
ਮੈ ਕਿਉ ਮਾਨੂ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਸਬ ਮਿਥਿਆ॥

ਗੁਰ ਅਵਤਾਰ ਦੇਹ ਧਾਰ ਹੀ ਆਵੈਂ॥
ਦੇਹੀ ਧਾਰ ਬਾਣੀ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਪ੍ਰਗਟਾਵੈਂ॥

ਢਡਰੀ ਭੀ ਤੋ ਮਾਤਾ ਕਾ ਜਾਇਆ॥
ਇਹ ਭੀ ਤੋਂ ਗਰਭ ਜੂਨੀ ਆਇਆ॥

ਇਹ ਸਭ ਇਸ ਕੀ ਮੂਰਖਤਾਈ॥
ਸਾਕਤ ਇਸਕੀ ਬੁਧ ਉਲਟਾਈ॥

ਦੋਹਰਾ॥

ਰਣਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਢਡਰੀਆਂ ਕਾ, ਅਪਨਾ ਹੀ ਪੰਥ ਚਲਾਇ॥
ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਬਲਵਾਨ ਜੋ, ਖਿਨ ਮਹਿ ਇਸੇ ਖਪਾਇ॥

Dialogue should be held with Ranjit Singh - not anger or violence

ਹਿੰਦੂ ਸਾਹ ਲੈਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਸਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਲੈਣਾ। ਜੋ ਲਵੇ ਸੋ ਤਨਖਾਹੀਆ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਪਾਣੀ ਪੀਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਪਾਣੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਪੀਣਾ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਰੋਟੀ ਖਾਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਰੋਟੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਖਾਣੀ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਕੱਪੜੇ ਪਾਉਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਕੱਪੜੇ ਤਿਆਗ ਦੇਣੇ ਹੁਣ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਟੱਟੀ-ਪਿਸ਼ਾਬ ਕਰਦਾ , ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਟੱਟੀ-ਪਿਸ਼ਾਬ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਨਾ। ਜੋ ਕਰੇ ਸੋ RSS ਦਾ ਗੁਲਾਮ।

ਹੋ ਗਈਆਂ ਪੰਜ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਕਠੀਆਂ ? ਦੱਸੋ ਕੀ ਫਰਕ ਹੈ ਸਾਡੇ ਚ ਤੇ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਚ ?

Unquote:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Kamalroop is going to pick on a child version of Ranjit Singh is an unfair standard, (he's still wrong though). Ranjit Singh doesn't know that even the Light of God put a tilak on, but again Ranjit hasn't once said that Guru Sahib is God. This is basic history which proves how stupid the things he says is, but Kamalroop is also in the wrong for being an RSS agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
8 minutes ago, genie said:

You believe Guru Sahib is God? And if so which Guru sahib?

This question has been addressed hundereds of times. But my unchanged view you can read here: 

haven't you already asked this question before: 

But yes Guru Sahib is Vaheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

This question has been addressed hundereds of times. But my unchanged view you can read here: 

haven't you already asked this question before: 

But yes Guru Sahib is Vaheguru.

In my personal view and my reading of gurbani scriptures he clearly is not God but a messenger/agent of God. The light of God was in him (is it is in all of us) to do Waheguru's work but he was more enlightened and blessed with powers more than any of us will ever be. Here are my main reasons why he was not God:

1) Because Guru Nanak Sahib Ji himself praises God as an external entity. He does not state he is Waheguru and for him to be worshipped.

2) Guru Gobind Singh Ji (whose light of guruship was transferred to him) stated he is not God and says anyone who claims he is will be cursed.

So if the light of the Guru's has been carried from the 1st to the last we can see there is a consistent message of Waheguru being an external force and the Guru's were messengers of Waheguru who had attained the power and permission from God to do what they came on earth to do.

As for the instances where some lines are said to have state in SGGS Ji that Guru Nanak was God this can be explained by the use of metaphors and not literally meaning he was Waheguru himself descended on earth. Because that would have clearly been a false premise as had Waheguru really came down to earth then logic would tell us that all crimes, sins and other evil deeds would have come to an end and there would be perfect harmony and peace in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
54 minutes ago, genie said:

In my personal view and my reading of gurbani scriptures he clearly is not God but a messenger/agent of God. The light of God was in him (is it is in all of us) to do Waheguru's work but he was more enlightened and blessed with powers more than any of us will ever be. Here are my main reasons why he was not God:

1) Because Guru Nanak Sahib Ji himself praises God as an external entity. He does not state he is Waheguru and for him to be worshipped.

2) Guru Gobind Singh Ji (whose light of guruship was transferred to him) stated he is not God and says anyone who claims he is will be cursed.

So if the light of the Guru's has been carried from the 1st to the last we can see there is a consistent message of Waheguru being an external force and the Guru's were messengers of Waheguru who had attained the power and permission from God to do what they came on earth to do.

As for the instances where some lines are said to have state in SGGS Ji that Guru Nanak was God this can be explained by the use of metaphors and not literally meaning he was Waheguru himself descended on earth. Because that would have clearly been a false premise as had Waheguru really came down to earth then logic would tell us that all crimes, sins and other evil deeds would have come to an end and there would be perfect harmony and peace in the world.

I'm not going to argue on the issue on this topic, but if you are interested in arguing about it; then you can create a new thread and add me on it. (The result of being considered one of the most sarcastic people on this site, prevents me from doing it). But before ending it your last paragraph asks about sin ending if Guru Sahib was Vaheguru and he came on the world, but Vaheguru is already everywhere and has existed before time; so that would just be going on a decline for humanity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use