Jump to content

Who is Ragunath in gurbani


Pallav2015
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi I want to know who’s ragunath in gurbani Hindu claim this word appear for ram chandra

if we read guru teg bahadur maharaj salok maharaj clearly rejecting ram gayo ravan geo

but at the last pangti

Kahu naanak īh bipaṭi mai
tek ēyk ragɦunaaṭɦ ॥55॥
Says Nanak, in this calamity, the Lord alone is my support
who is this ragunaath
why would maharaj use ragunath as refrence for god?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything in Gurbani points us towards the Atma. Atma and Parmatma are the same…

Atama and Parmatma is the source that creates and causes everything…

What have the following items got in common?

A fan.

A television.

A fridge.

A radio.

A computer..?

These things are powered by electricity. Without electricity these things are lifeless. It’s the electricity that causes these things to function…

Atma is the source of energy that allows everything to happen. 
 

without Atma, we are lifeless…

Call this Atama RAGUNATH…call this Atma by any other name…the fact remains that it’s the life force energy…

Dieties also have the same Atma as humans, but they still part of the creation, and not the creator…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/17/2023 at 5:10 PM, Pallav2015 said:

How people use to meditate before satguru Nanak dev ji came to this world ??

Before Guru Nanak…people engaged in Hatt Yog…

But Guru Nanak preached Bhagti Yog…which is more feasible in this era. Also, Bhagti Yog is for everyone…no caste discrimination etc…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/25/2023 at 10:43 PM, MokhamSingh said:

Before Guru Nanak…people engaged in Hatt Yog…

But Guru Nanak preached Bhagti Yog…which is more feasible in this era. Also, Bhagti Yog is for everyone…no caste discrimination etc…

Thank you 🙏 for clearing my doubt 

On Ang 

695

 
Ḍaaḍɦeele laᴺkaa gaɍu ūpaaɍeele raavañ bañu
sali bisali ạañi ṭokɦeele haree ॥
In this pangti what does hari word mean whom bhagat trilochan ji saying 
is hari here used for ram Chandra ??
I thought bhagat were nirgun upshak 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If my name was Hari, Waheguru, Ram, Damodar etc…Is Gurbani praising me..?

Is Gurbani praising the Jyot that is the cause of everything..?

The Jyot Akal Purakh has no specific name…the Jyot empowers life and actions to take place…

SGGS only praises the Jyot…not individuals…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/20/2024 at 6:56 AM, MokhamSingh said:

If my name was Hari, Waheguru, Ram, Damodar etc…Is Gurbani praising me..?

Is Gurbani praising the Jyot that is the cause of everything..?

The Jyot Akal Purakh has no specific name…the Jyot empowers life and actions to take place…

SGGS only praises the Jyot…not individuals…

With all due respect if god is formless how did he get all those name ??

who’s is banwali?? 
ਮਹਲਾ ੧ ਘਰੁ ੧  “ਚੇਤਹੁ ਬਾਸੁਦੇਉ ਬਨਵਾਲੀ 
Guru Sahib has also used the name "Banwali" with Basudev. This word means “Remember in the heart Vasudeva Krishna or Vishnu wearing the garland of forest flowers”. Sikh scholars also confuse here and lie that this word is used for formless God. Bhai Sahib, the word "Banwali" means one who garlands the flowers of Ban (Vishnu). Have you ever seen a picture of Vishnu ji or Krishna ji wearing this garland around their neck. Does the formless God also wear this garland. Professor Sahib Singh ji has also played a trick on this page, he gives the wrong meaning of this word. But this Sahib Singh ji explains the real meaning of this Banwali word on another page, see Sahib Singh (Page 997), Banwali = Banmali, garlanded with Ban flower, Vishnu, God.
These things show whether these preachers deliberately misrepresent.
By the way, it is absolutely clear that this name is used for Krishna. But if we also assume that this name is used for his father. "Whose spirit is in their father?" Are these people making fun of Bani? How simple Punjabi is, anyone can read it. Think about it, it is with Punjabi, they are so wrongly translated, what bad situation would the kathavachak have done to the Hindu scriptures?
Now judge for yourself whether it is not impolite to tell a lie in the presence of Guru Sahib. Is it not sacrilegious to twist and misrepresent the words of Guru Sahib?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use