Jump to content

Where were Nihungs in 1984?


me moorakh mugadh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

to me, most are pakandhees

thats a whole nother story, but lets not expect others to do something we're not ready to do, regardless of what theyre saying. im done with this as its pointless to keep going back and forth.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vahiguru ji ka khalsa, Vahiguru ji ki fateh!

Sadh Sangat Jio,

Could i do a Benti for everyone to PLEASE keep on track i.e. the issues around Consumption of Bhang/Maas etc. Please only Post if you are adding something constructive otherwise this thread will become a hotpotch. Sorry if i have offended anyone with my words.

Dear Veer/Bhain 'Guroodachela' ji,

You wrote: 'Every that you quote from bhagat kabir's bani is good and I agree with what he said. But you have to understand that even in puratan janam sakhi's Akali Nihang Guroo Gobind Singh Jee strictly prohibited the consumption of meat if you are following the PATH OF PEACE AND NON-MARTIAL TRADITIONS such as the Udhasi and Nirmala Panths'.

> Veer Ji, we come to the issue of puratan janam sakhis, literature etc. once again...i personally feel that it is hindering this debate - to the extent that both sides of the fence can easily be argued hence a stalemate situation occurs.

However, what is worth discussing is this distinction between MARTIAL and NON-MARTIAL TRADITIONS...i.e. you went on to write:

'The Akali's on the other were have to eat meat. Guroo sahib didnt want to have a weak frightened and scared army that doesnt eat meat. YOUR FIGHTING WAR FOR GODSAKE! If you cant -- an animal to eat or eat flesh and blood of an animal how are you going to -- other humans. Common sense'.

> Veer ji, i'm afraid that is not common-sense...to argue that one must -- animals and eat their flesh in order to have the composure of a Saint-Soldier is a seriously flawed argument. Are you saying that unless you murder animals, you will not b

e able to physically DEFEND yourself and will inevitably get 'squeamish' at the sight of blood?

Please expand upon the premise behind this point of yours in order to save me from assuming things and looking like a plonker (which i usually do!). :-)

Also Veer ji, please pick up on the other central points from my previous post. It may be better to do that before we get into the 'we must --/eat animals to be Saint Soldiers' debate.

On a sidenote, as someone who identifies themselves with the 'Akali Nihang Tradition', what do you think of Akali Koar Singh ji's major belief-reversal i.e. from Chatka'ing to Vegetarianism?

Indeed, do you know if he did desist from eating Meat for the rest of his life and if so, was he excommunicated from the Buddha Dal/or whichever Dal he was with? i would find any information regarding this really interesting.

Thank you in advance.

Vahiguru ji ka khalsa, Vahiguru ji ki fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have not taken amrit

that is why i ask, these nihangs put on a spectacle of being armed yet do nothing when they time arises

to me, most are pakandhees

I agree with that.. Nihangs were warrior before british came.. afterwards they did nothing and become more lazier...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a little off topic....

Veerjis,

Nihungs are like the samurai, when given the orders they will give their life, they weren't given the orders by the jathedar of their dal, more importantly, I don't think they've been trained, or have the mindset Guru Gobind Singh ji wanted his Khalsa to have, which is to be involved in worldly affairs, politics, and find out what's happening in the world, and take part in it. For the Nihungs, more influence is just on Shaster Vidya / Gatka, bir rus, and being decked out. Rather than being involved in politics, staying upto date with the news in this world.

When they knew tension was very high in Sri Harmandir Sahib, why didn't they take the initiative to atleast setup their akharay, there just in case. Were they too good for that? Or did they just not pay attention?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mehtab
Sorry to be a little off topic....

Veerjis,

Nihungs are like the samurai, when given the orders they will give their life, they weren't given the orders by the jathedar of their dal, more importantly, I don't think they've been trained, or have the mindset Guru Gobind Singh ji wanted his Khalsa to have, which is to be involved in worldly affairs, politics, and find out what's happening in the world, and take part in it. For the Nihungs, more influence is just on Shaster Vidya / Gatka, bir rus, and being decked out. Rather than being involved in politics, staying upto date with the news in this world.

When they knew tension was very high in Sri Harmandir Sahib, why didn't they take the initiative to atleast setup their akharay, there just in case. Were they too good for that? Or did they just not pay attention?

Well done! This was the main question asked when this thread started and somehow moved onto meat and maryada. Thanks for reminding us Daljeet.

Now back to main question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

khalsay kay sikhan kee nindak jo nind karay jan boojh narak par aiso bataayo.

guru sahib says anyone who does nindya of my khalsa will not be saved and will go straight to hell.

------------------------------------

ni(n)dhak ni(n)dhaa kar mal dhhovai ouhu malabhakh maaeiaadhhaaree ||

By slandering, the slanderer washes the filth off others; he is an eater of filth, and a worshipper of Maya.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.tapoban.org/phorum/read.ppa?f=1...i=15760&t=15760

Excerpt:

"Sree Akali Kaur Singh jee’s Gurmat attitude was always focused on kindess and doing good for others. Because of his long stay at Sree Hazoor Sahib, he was very heavily affected by Nihang traditions. But after returning to Punjab and meeting the Singh Sabha, he turned away from the Nihang way of doing things. But a couple Nihang practices were permanently lodged in him. He had his own way of thinking to a large extent. Akali jee always read “Ik Oankaar” as “Aykee Oankaar.” I discussed this with him at length but he continued in this practice. Leaving these disagreements behind, I had so much love and respect for his Gurmat qualities, which will remain forever. He was four years younger than me, but left before me. He didn’t let my turn come. According to the vaak “Vaaree aapoo aapNee koi n bandhai dheer” p. 936, my turn to go to the hereafter is also nearby".

Author: Bhai Sahib Bhai Randhir Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use