Jump to content

Bluestar fans Khalistan embers


Recommended Posts

“I am in regular touch with Wadhwa Singh of the Babbar Khalsa International, Paramjiot Singh Panjwar of the Khalistan Commando Force and Lakhbir Singh Rode of the Sikh Youth International to try and evolve a strategy to create Khalistan. I have also asked them to come back to India like I have done and work among the community here.”

What the hell's up Chauhan's <admin-profanity filter activated>, he wants these singhs to walk back into india, who are on india most wanted list!!

102047[/snapback]

Shows Chohan for what he really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

*mod edited*

*MOD NOTE : Do not leave yourselves vulnerable to liable action. Forums are serious business and we dont want anyone getting introuble. All IP addresses can be traced via the necessary internet authorities and we dont want to see any of the members here get in trouble. Death threats will certainly not be tolerated. Thanks for your understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all i gotta say is shame on all of you bashing mohak singh chaudhary (with the exception of sikh supreme) instead of telling the guy where he is wrong and educating him with the truth, you deicde to use insulting and threatening behaviour, what a great bunch of singhs we have on the forum you lot sholud be proud of yourselves.

*MOD NOTE: An excellent reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fair enough singh, i understand where you are coming from. However I have yet to see, Radha Swamis, Naamdharis, Narakhdharis, Sant Ji bashers, BKI bashers, singh kharkoo bashers, come on this forum, listen to facts and actually change their minds about what they wrote.

There are those who come on this forum and say, hey I heard this about Sant Ji, is it true...however the ones who say straightforward, he was a terrorist blah blah blah, monai sikhs were massacred in the thousands by atwaadis, i doubt they are waiting to be educated. These people have their minds made up about the movement and come heer to spread their hatred. It's like reforming KP Gill and Badal, i mean some people are just lost causes...yes we should be open to discussion, but we shouldn't be naive.

fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mann bro from what this guy said he just shares the view basic view of people who dont know anything about the 80's an the movement. all he said was:

jarnail singh bhindranwala was no saint.he was neither a terrorist. he was just a congress stooge who turned against his own masters. he was just a preacher who was brought into lime light by sanjay gandhi to counter the akali's

this is the common view amongst those with limited knowledge, half of people in punjab think this, most of the west does too, and this guy is from india so what do you expect.

monai sikhs were massacred in the thousands by atwaadis

believe it or not but some 'singhs' did go around killing monay, its true.

at the end of the day education is whats needed not telling the guy hes going to get bullets through his chest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree that he doesn't deserve bullets through his chest, i mean that is just plain ridiculous. I'm just saying that a lot of these threads are supposed to be informative and are supposed to spread knowledge and sometimes one or two people hi-jack the thread and the sangat wastes so much time and effort attacking the thread-jackers, that the whole point of the thread gets lost.

I agree that we should try to lay out the facts to people like this. However, after two or three attempts the on-line sangat should just ignore the person. Real life is different because one can see the person's passion for the truth while on-line, it is so impersonal that it is really hard to change people's views who have held them their whole lives. I'm not saying we should not try to educate the people who don't know the facts about the Sikh issues, i'm just saying that on-line some people should just be ignored. I mean, who knows, it could be some 80 year old RSS waala causing trouble on the forum.

fateh singh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh yeah as for monay sikh being killed by kharkoos. They were not killed for being monay. Many monay sikhs were part of the punjab Police and gov't secret agencies. Don't forget many keshadhari "sikhs" were also killed by kharkoos. Look at Beant Sio, he was keshadhaari, you know he got what he deserved. Saying that kharkoos killed monay is so vague and wrong becuase it implies that some holy agenda was prepared by the sikh movement to kill all non-amritdharis, when the reality was that all amritdharis were marked for death by the punjab police and the indian armed forces.

Let's not spread vague propaganda. For people who say monay sikhs and innocent people were killed by the kharkoos, name the kharkoos and the incidents. Most of the times, the incidents involved fake kharkoos and the kharkoo orgs denied everything. Whereas the Punjab police admitted using fake kharkoo groups to terrorize the masses, they admitted to having a free-hand at killing kharkoos. Jaswant singh khalra proved the punjab police committed human rights abuses, i have yet to see solid eveidence against the kharkoo movement.

I know the kharkoos killed many sikhs, because it was many of our own people who were killing amritdharis. Look at Ajit Sandhu, SSP taran Taaran Sahib, KP GIll, Beant sio, Badal, etc. Sikh police were gunned down becuase they tortured hundreds of Sikh youth to death. Trust me if my father or anyone in my family for that matter was behind the killing of sikhs, I would have no anger if kharkoos did justice. Tiem and again you can hear Sant Ji, saying I don't condone killing innocents, Baba Manhochal said the same, bhai sukhdev singh babbar said the same. All top kharkoo singhs made this point very clear, if some 19 year old bad boy in some pind took up arms and claimed to be a kharkoo and raped and stole, that doesn't mean the kharkoos lehar was the motive. The highest police officer in the punjab police has committed mass murder and it has been proven, the highest leader of the sikh dharam yudh morcha is spotless, you tell me who the terrorists are.

fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all im saying is the person only made one bad remark which was that he said: "he was just a congress stooge who turned against his own masters. he was just a preacher who was brought into lime light by sanjay gandhi to counter the akali's"

hes also said that sant ji was not a terrorist, that he didnt hate hindus, so why not get rid of his misconception, it just seems to me that hes been watching the indira gandhi docmunetary which was made by the bbc. mark tully and kushwant 'singh' they stated the exact same thing, that sant ji was brought in by sanjay gandhi.

However, after two or three attempts the on-line sangat should just ignore the person.

only one attempt was made, by sikh supreme, rest all just bashed the guy, and he hasnt replied in the thread since anyway, he asked for 10 reason, sikh supreme gave them, thats the way this thread should have been dealt with, not threats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not saying that the genuine kharkus killed innocents, but infiltrators into kharku groups did, and by being associated with the group it brought bad name to the real singhs, how are the simple villagers to know whos genuine and who isn't. again its a misconception that this is what kharkus did but people started to believe that it was the actions of kharkus.

that's why i wrote 'singhs' in the original thread (notice the inverted commas)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with you singh. I guess i was generalizing about all threads of this kind not just this one in particular, where the thread goes on forever trying to fight off thread-jackers.

And yes i agree that threats are not warranted, excpet after about three strikes rolleyes.gif

anyways, we're on the same page singh. chal fer takra ge koyee hor thread wich :doh:

fateh bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use