Jump to content

Is This Maryada?


LostSoul
 Share

Recommended Posts

Great post Kharkoo4life!  d_oh.gif

You are 100% spot on about Sikhs willing to accept any story that anyone conjures up about Guru Gobind Singh. Take a look at the number of stories some kathakars are dreaming up, many of which are totally against Gurbani. Just as we are getting more and more Sakhis being made up by some kathakars, we are also now getting the nice and neat pidgeonholing of prominant Khalsa Sikhs into Nihangs, Nirmalas and Sewapanthis!

134697[/snapback]

SO true. Makes on wonder, during the establishment of Khalsa in 1699, did Guru Gobind Singh pick and choose his Singhs as they took amrit and send them off to different groups one by one? That you put on a blue dastaar and go to that jatha, you put on a chitee dastaar n go to that jatha, n u walk around without a pajama and go to that jatha. Going by the kinds of stories told by some kathavachaks i wouldnt be surprised if the next one created does just that. WOuldnt make it much different from an ordinary NHL entry draft with each draftee goin to diff team donning a diff jersey.

Time has come for the Khalsa Panth to wake up and realize that the goal of entering the Panth is not to become divided up again but to remove all divisions and unite as one!!

One Panth, One Granth following the One Rub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nirmalas are pujaris who are based on building deras and taking money. Why woud they start adding stuff such as Sant in front of their names then? What contribution have they made to the Panth? None. Maybe brahmifying of Khalsa Panth. Also answer my questions about rehras. Who gave the sant babas and dera walas power to change the maryada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<I was just wondering though were they could even begin to think up this type of "maryada">>

<<<Its because they either aint ever read the sri guru grant sahib ji, or they cant understand it.

Then ignorance kicked in.

They should be corrected>>>

This is interesting, since many of today's Jathabandis also derive their Sarabloh Bibek, dubious bana (featuring certain lengths for the chola and what not), own brand of Kakkars, Pati-Parmeasur Pooja and various other things, that many here regard to be "chardi kala" from these very rehitnamas, of course they use SELECTIVE quotes from the Sri Guru Granth Sahib, but then THEY ALL DO THIS!!! and THEY are ALL still DIFFERENT!!!

The best thing is that all these groups systematically attack the Akal Thakt Rehit Maryada, whether openly or underhand (by publically claiming they support the Akal Thakt, when clearly their actions and beliefs do not) and deride it as some form of SGPC invented Rehit or some Christianity accomodating adaption from the articles of the CoE.

The even funnier thing is that this seems to be the only consistent item that these groups agree to - i.e. oppose THE Sikh Rehit Maryada, on other points they argue consistently between themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use