Jump to content

Why Do Some Singhs Wear No Pajama With Bana?


Guest Just Curious
 Share

Recommended Posts

"They now wear the lil necklace"-

Im sorry but I don't understand that. A kirpan is a kirpan. I mean I have heard of these necklaces that you wear instead of wearing your kirpan. However it is not acceptable. Nothing can replace a kakaar. It is like saying you can cut your hair but wear a wig to cover it up.

A kirpan is a kirpan people!

Can you please explain to me what exactly you meant by that statement?

Waheguruu =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Kirpan is kirpan, thats absolutely right.

I have seen people wearing "choti" kirpan (3 inch or less). is that kirpan guru ji gave us? guru ji gave REAL kirpan...3 feet long. Nobody wears that now.

Also, can bibiyan wear bana without pajami?....like as jassa ji explained in the time of war and horse etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should a Bibi wear Pyjami with Bana but men are told that they shouldn't.

If this is something related to the fact of women having hair on their legs and now it has become socially unacceptable in our society to show that than you guys are lost.

In sikhi, equality is something that each of our Guru's fought for.

Women should be able to wear bana without Pyjami just due to the fact that thats how Bana is worn.

Now, here in Western counrties it gets quite cold during the Winter Season. So it is understable why Singh's/Bibi's would perfer to wear Pyjami's.

I am not saying that Bibi's should NEVER wear Pyjami's with Bana. But I am only fighting for the fact that Why should Bibi's have to wear Pyjami's and Singhs are told not too?

Please Forgive me If I have said anything wrong.

Waheguru Waheguru Waheguru =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest peacemaker

It's no so much the hair on their legs, I sure don't mind that, it's just that men and women have different areas that are private on their body. Like it might be ok for a man to wear no shirt in his house if he really doesn't feel like wearing one, but if a woman wore no shirt, people would say that was wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I got it, its the same reason muslims cover their women for. They feel that whole of the women is "private" but we sikh only require to cover some parts of women as we think they are private.

But "legs" are private too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but then whats so private with womens legs? legs are legs aren't they? i personally wouldn't wear no pyjami but some people say that we believe in equality so then why should bibia have to wear pyjami and men don't. Or is it just that bibia choose to wear one?

fatehjee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no so much the hair on their legs, I sure don't mind that, it's just that men and women have different areas that are private on their body. Like it might be ok for a man to wear no shirt in his house if he really doesn't feel like wearing one, but if a woman wore no shirt, people would say that was wrong.

This is the thinking of a feeble-mind. We all accept things that we see, who said men can go around the house without a shirt? If a woman without a shirt is indecent so is a man. This clearly shows how our thinking is contaminated becuase of certain rules created by the society. Tribal people (be it man or woman) still dont wear anything on top. now you'll call em uncivilized. :)

If a bibi is comfortable in kachera and chola so it is fine. If people want to wear pajami so be it. religion is not about wearing speacial kapre. there should not be any problem even if a bibi has hair on her legs. Some men dont get a darri (beard) should they wear a burka ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurfateh!!

Don't forget that the bana which is being discussed here has not always been the bana of the Khalsa, it has changed it has adapted as it has needed to. Bana was at times just a Kashera and still is just a Kashera along with Panj Kakkar and Dumala. Singh would keep themselves warm with jus a kumbal. Over time this has changed, bana didn't have pockets now it does, bana could have been any colour, i've seen green and as you can see in picture of the week it is brown.

The pajama was just something that was traditionally worn when it was cold, now some rehitnameh say you should wear a pajama, well the Kashera sould below knee lenght.

With regards to bibiya and bana, i can't really say because i have not seen much evidence of bibiya wearing bana in the past, whether the likes of the Shaheed Singhnia wore bana is questionable because, even nihang singhs wifes don't. The only women who have traditionally worn bana were those who joined the Dals and gave up their normal lives and live like the Nihang Singhs.

Bhul Chuk Maaf!

Gurfateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use