Jump to content

Guru and Waheguru?


S1ngh
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think mor eof Gurus like

if someone asks me what were the Guru's

My answer is

'They are ONE WITH GOD'

they are not GOD HIMSELF' but they are ONE WITH GOD

as Khalistani bhaji's signature says

that when a BrahmGyaani is in hisphysical Body

he is ONE WITH GOD,

when he passes away, from HIM theres no difference

because he is STILL ONE WITH GOD...there wasn't any difference for the BRAHMGYANI!

because when he was 'living' he was one with God, and after passagin away..he is STILL one with God

where was the difference?

bhull chukk maaf ;)

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think mor eof Gurus like

if someone asks me what were the Guru's

My answer is

'They are ONE WITH GOD'

they are not GOD HIMSELF' but they are ONE WITH GOD

as Khalistani bhaji's signature says

that when a BrahmGyaani is in hisphysical Body

he is ONE WITH GOD,

when he passes away, from HIM theres no difference

because he is STILL ONE WITH GOD...there wasn't any difference for the BRAHMGYANI!

because when he was 'living' he was one with God, and after passagin away..he is STILL one with God

where was the difference?

bhull chukk maaf ;)

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

ohmy.gif Wow. Totally insightful!! ohmy.gif

That makes se

nse. Being one with god and god himself isn't that same thing.

The way I see it, God is actually the metaphysical sum of everything that exists in the past, present, and future. We, and the gurus, are just small parts of that total sum, except that the gurus actually have a link with God, and thats what makes them so great! ^_^

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think mor eof Gurus like

if someone asks me what were the Guru's

My answer is

'They are ONE WITH GOD'

they are not GOD HIMSELF' but they are ONE WITH GOD

as Khalistani bhaji's signature says

that when a BrahmGyaani is in hisphysical Body

he is ONE WITH GOD,

when he passes away, from HIM theres no difference

because he is STILL ONE WITH GOD...there wasn't any difference for the BRAHMGYANI!

because when he was 'living' he was one with God, and after passagin away..he is STILL one with God

where was the difference?

bhull chukk maaf :(

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

ohmy.gif Wow. Totally insightful!! ohmy.gif

That makes sense. Being one with god and god himself isn't that same thing.

The way I see it, God is actually the metaphysical sum of everything that exists in the past, present, and future. We, and the gurus, are just small parts of that total sum, except that the gurus actually have a link with God, and thats what makes them so great! ^_^

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

I think mor eof Gurus like

if someone asks me what were the Guru's

My answer is

'They are ONE WITH GOD'

they are not GOD HIMSELF' but they are ONE WITH GOD

as Khalistani bhaji's signature says

that when a BrahmGyaani is in hisphysical Body

he is ONE WITH GOD,

when he passes away, from HIM theres no difference

because he is STILL ONE WITH GOD...there wasn't any difference for the BRAHMGYANI!

because when he was 'living' he was one with God, and after passagin away..h

e is STILL one with God

where was the difference?

bhull chukk maaf :wub:

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

ohmy.gif Wow. Totally insightful!!

That makes sense. Being one with god and god himself isn't that same thing.

The way I see it, God is actually the metaphysical sum of everything that exists in the past, present, and future. We, and the gurus, are just small parts of that total sum, except that the gurus actually have a link with God, and thats what makes them so great! ^_^

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

thanks for sharing your views ^_^

that wasn't really my views..but I AGREE REALLY MUCH about it

it really gave me a perspacetive

it was the veiws of the the SweetSikhi team of Panjab Radio

actually its coming NOW 7:50 pm Uk time

@ panjabradio.co.uk

ten mins left

I recommend ya'all to listen to it every Sunday'

<

!--QuoteBegin-->

QUOTE
That makes sense. Being one with god and god himself isn't that same thing.

Correct..hard to explain, but if you think about it..you get it..a Lil bit atleast :@

as Waheguroo is BEYOND our comprehension :@

The way I see it, God is actually the metaphysical sum of everything that exists in the past, present, and future.
exactly, what I thought :wub: ;)
We, and the gurus, are just small parts of that total sum, except that the gurus actually have a link with God, and thats what makes them so great!

just that the Gurus aren't SMALL parts but a quite BIG part :umm:

N3O bhaiji meantioned

if you do not see God in all you do not see God at ALL ;)

bhull chukk maaf

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest balwinderkaur
I had to answer the exact same question for this book i started writing so here is what i came up with

Waheguru = father/mother

We been sent here on earth to learn ( world is our school ) so then we can join the university of sachkhand.

Guru = our teacher

Sikhi = the Course

Sikh = Student

Namm japna,vand chakna, kirat karna <- 3 subjects, theory and practical :T:

Exam = We take this test after death and if we pass then its off to Sachkhand uni otherwise its back to the old class (reincarnation ) ohmy.gif

i like this analogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Really kool analogy bhia amardeep je

But wouldnt our life time be the test, and the time when we go to dharam raj be when we see how we did? And we also have to keep all of the reight, althought the 3 u posted are really major imoprtant part of the reight.

bhul chuk maf

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guru prmysru eyku hY sB mih rihAw smwie ]

ijn kau pUrib iliKAw syeI nwmu iDAwie ]

gur paramaesar eaek hai sabh mehi rehiaa samaae ||

jin ko poorab likhiaa saeee naam dhhiaae ||

The Guru and the Transcendent Lord are one and the same, pervading and permeating amongst all.

Those who have such pre-ordained destiny, meditate on the Naam.

waheguru

jio whats the diffrence between one with God...and being Him?

;)

i mean as teh above quote says.

im bit confused now( after readin what mr singh wrote and what Gurbani says)

blush.gif .

isn't vaheguru like ocean?

good question sardar B. singh ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

ok, they were not the same being, like they werent vaheguru going in and out of bodies or something, but please read the brahm giani part of my singature to help explain that shabad, and to explain how they were the same but different.

bhul chuk maf

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use