Jump to content

I have a question


Recommended Posts

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

I asked this question from a learned Sikh who gave me a nice explanation for this query.

In vachitra Natak Guru Gobind Singh ji stated that he is here for a special purpose. He told us:

"I tell the world only what my God said to me, for I will not be silenced through fear of the mere mortals. I utter as is the Instruction of my God, for I consider no one greater than Him"

Therefore Guru Gobind Singh's bani is full of a mission and God's praises.In his bani he told us why he came to this world and his mission.Therefore bani of tenth Nanak(Guru Gobind Singh) is different from first nine Nanaks.But the message is same and came out much stronger that WE ALL SHOULD WORSHIP ONLY ONE GOD.

Now the question here was my total misunderstanding of the 'dohra'.Here 'GOBIND' DOES NOT mean Guru Gobind Singh.Here it means GOBIND the almighty.Thats why the line goes like "gobind DASS tohar" i.e. servernt of GOD(GOBIND).

Rest in SGGS it is beleived that Guru ji has 2-3 lines in Shlok Mehl 9 where he used 'NANAK' ,as used by other Nanaks.

Thnks for ur input and I m sorry for misinterpretation of Gurbani.

I hope this will help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Veeer ji your reply cleared the speculations regarding this to great extent.

Even if we read on Page 485 in SGGS ji (Bani Bhagat Namdev ji)

“Sab Gobind Hai Sab Gobind Hai

Gobind Bin Nahin Koi”

Now here also, Gobind implies the Akal Purakh, so i guess, you are abs. rite and point should be clear.

Secondly, regarding the use of "Nanak" by Guru Gobind Singh ji in SGGS JI (assumed to be by Guru Gobind Singh ji) is again a controversial topic, i'm giving the link, please read whole topic, and you will see the contradiction.

http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion....24?OpenDocument

your post make lot of sense to me, thnx for it.

Bhul Chuk Maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Yeah, Kulprit veer je, I agree with whatever you said I think(with my limited thinking) there is a reason of every thing in sikhi, well I guess Guru Gobind Singh Je’s Not mentioning the word “Nanak” in his bani is itself a GREAT evident and REASON( I may b wrong too) that Guru Je NEVER EVER wanted his bani to be equated with or incorporated into Dhan Dhan Sahib Shri Guru Granth Sahib Je. He always wanted us to go with “Sabh Sikhan Ko Hukam Hain” and wat was that Hukum (Command)???? (We all know that Guru Hukum is Attal)……..It was “GURU MANNEEOO GRANTH”… But being Dasam Granth’s panth approved bani written by Sahib-E-Guru Gobind Singh, CERTAINLY deserves great respect and reverence. Rest I agreee wid “Bhramh Gyanee kee Gatt Bhramh Gyani Jaanay”

Arash

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use