Jump to content

I have a question


Recommended Posts

I dont wanna offend anybdy.Please try to understand what I m askin.

Why did guru gobind singh ji didn't use the word 'nanak' in his bani as did by all other gurus (like nanak das).Instead guru gobind singh ji used 'gobind das'.Why didn't he use nanak das as other gurus did?

please help me understand this.

Thanks.

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think this is why:

Because Guru Granth Sahib Jee is our Guru

and Guru Granth Sahib Jee contains all bani under the name of "Naanak"

Guru Gobind Singh jee wanted to remain consistent with this rule,

so outside of Guru Granth Sahib jee his Baanee was not called by the pen name of Naanak

this is my wiiiiiiiiiild guess.

HOWEVER, guru gobind singh jee is STILL guru nanak's jot and LITERALLY it means that

all the gurus were mahalas

and all the gurus were also patshahs

because if Guru Gobind Singh jee was patshahi 10 then who was patshahi 9 ?

so... Guru jee just changed the wording in order to prevent any misunderstanding between GURU (aad guru granth sahib) and NOT GURU (dasam granth sahib)

I think the bottom line is that all of the Gurus were Mahala (Piri, Degh, Daya) and Patshahi (Miri, Tegh, Dharam) all in one.

and going back to Singh Sahib's question - As Son of Guru Gobind SIngh jee put it only the brahmgyanee knows his own reasons.

But we can be sure that Guru Nanak and Guru Gobind Singh are the same jyot, which is in Guru Granth SAhib.

bhul chuk maaf karnaa jeeeeeeeee

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thnx for the reply Rochak veer ji and others.As far as I know, guru ji didn't write "patshahi dasvi", it was bhai mani singh who wrote this thing over dasam patshah bani while compiling it.I dont know the source of this info, but i read it somewhere.Rest I agree with u at all points.

Thnx once again.

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is why:

Because Guru Granth Sahib Jee is our Guru

and Guru Granth Sahib Jee contains all bani under the name of "Naanak"

Guru Gobind Singh jee wanted to remain consistent with this rule,

so outside of Guru Granth Sahib jee his Baanee was not called by the pen name of Naanak

this is my wiiiiiiiiiild guess.

HOWEVER, guru gobind singh jee is STILL guru nanak's jot and LITERALLY it means that

all the gurus were mahalas

and all the gurus were also patshahs

because if Guru Gobind Singh jee was patshahi 10 then who was patshahi 9 ?

so... Guru jee just changed the wording in order to prevent any misunderstanding between GURU (aad guru granth sahib) and NOT GURU (dasam granth sahib)

Because those Gurus who didn't write in Guru Granth Sahib,

I think the bottom line is that all of the Gurus were Mahala (Piri, Degh, Daya) and Patshahi (Miri, Tegh, Dharam) all in one.

and going back to Singh Sahib's question - As Son of Guru Gobind SIngh jee put it only the brahmgyanee knows his own reasons.

But we can be sure that Guru Nanak and Guru Gobind Singh are the same jyot, which is in Guru Granth SAhib.

bhul chuk maaf karnaa jeeeeeeeee

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Waheguru ji !

Great points Kulpreet ji! I fully agree wit ur points !!!

Only Guru ji knows himself what he means...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use