Ragi Darshan Singh A Bollywood Actor

[Inder Singh]

Wow the Admin posting such bias views.

Didn't know Sikhsangat Admin also made official statements about individuals in the panth, and stooped as low as calling other people "names". Especially considering the latest Gurmatta from Akal Takhat. Wait I forgot. Akal Takhat Gurmattas are only used when it suits someones views

Maturity level is clearly decreasing

Wasn't expecting that from admins

V, Jathedar of the Akaal Takht actually asked scholars to step forward and defend the image of DAsam Granth Sahib ji.

V

They have the spirit of sikhs.They have said the right thing.It is time that sikhs take on agents like sarna and namak haram sharabi Darshan lal.

Is darshan lal listening to akal takhat?

[V]

Mr Inder SIngh, never mind about Darshan SIngh - are YOU listening to Akal Takhat?

In what way are YOU better than him then?

When it comes to things that don't suit you you call it "phoney Gurmattas" and "phoney Singh Sahibs"

Seems like you're the only one with some sense - rest of Panth is all lost.

Anyway - why does Admins post remind me greatly of Inder Singhs posts - both are so full of hatred and abusive language. (notice the use of exact same words - namak haram etc etc.) Exactly what you'd expect from an unbias admin. Isn't it?

[proactive]

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

So to people like Inder Singh and Admin, can you confirm that you agree that as per Akal Takht Sikhs are allowed to eat Jhatka meat?

Btw isn't it amazing that a personality such as a former Akal Takht Jathedar that Darshan Singh was has suddenly been relegated to being plain Darshan Lal and even Darshan Lal Bhatra. I always knew him as just Darshan Singh Ragi but thanks to the investigative branch of SS we now know what his caste background is! We also learn that he is a sharabi, wonders never cease on this forum.

[Matheen]

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

What if the 5 pyare (Guru Ji's Saroop) tell you something different during Amrit Sanchar? e.g. meat.....

What role did the Akaal Takht play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time, by the way?

[Inder Singh]

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

So to people like Inder Singh and Admin, can you confirm that you agree that as per Akal Takht Sikhs are allowed to eat Jhatka meat?

Btw isn't it amazing that a personality such as a former Akal Takht Jathedar that Darshan Singh was has suddenly been relegated to being plain Darshan Lal and even Darshan Lal Bhatra. I always knew him as just Darshan Singh Ragi but thanks to the investigative branch of SS we now know what his caste background is! We also learn that he is a sharabi, wonders never cease on this forum.

Does Darshan lal bhatra obeys akal takhat.He does not.Shame on you for defending a sell out

[V]

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

What if the 5 pyare (Guru Ji's Saroop) tell you something different during Amrit Sanchar? e.g. meat.....

What role did the Akaal Takht play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time, by the way?

First - You follow your panj before anything else, but acknowledge that the Panth has made a decision on the issue, which ideally the Panj should have followed-

Secondly - What role did Darbar Sahib play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time? I've yet to find reference pointing towards him even visiting Darbar Sahib - that doesn't make Darbar Sahib "less holy" does it?

As for the role of Akal Takhat in our ithhas - we already know that Guru Hargobind Sahib made it with a sepcific intention. We already know that whenever there were any questions or queriees everyone turned - yes tor Akal Takhat, whether it was the issue of Bandai or Tat Khalsa, or whether Dasam Bani should be in one granth of several granths. It was always here that the Sikhs went for guidence. (practicly) all morchas in our history have started from here, whether it was against, Abdali, The British, Nehru, Indira Gandhi or against the Indian govn as a whole. It's Akal Takhat we've turned to. Not Patna Sahib, or any other takhat. It is to Akal Takhat kings like Ranjit Singh have had to submit. But nowadays polygamists (Iqbal Singh) seem to think that they're above the Akal Takhat and their decisions

Inder Singh - to you follow Akal Takhat? Equal amount of shame on you

[Inder Singh]

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

What if the 5 pyare (Guru Ji's Saroop) tell you something different during Amrit Sanchar? e.g. meat.....

What role did the Akaal Takht play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time, by the way?

First - You follow your panj before anything else, but acknowledge that the Panth has made a decision on the issue, which ideally the Panj should have followed-

Secondly - What role did Darbar Sahib play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time? I've yet to find reference pointing towards him even visiting Darbar Sahib - that doesn't make Darbar Sahib "less holy" does it?

As for the role of Akal Takhat in our ithhas - we already know that Guru Hargobind Sahib made it with a sepcific intention. We already know that whenever there were any questions or queriees everyone turned - yes tor Akal Takhat, whether it was the issue of Bandai or Tat Khalsa, or whether Dasam Bani should be in one granth of several granths. It was always here that the Sikhs went for guidence. (practicly) all morchas in our history have started from here, whether it was against, Abdali, The British, Nehru, Indira Gandhi or against the Indian govn as a whole. It's Akal Takhat we've turned to. Not Patna Sahib, or any other takhat. It is to Akal Takhat kings like Ranjit Singh have had to submit. But nowadays polygamists (Iqbal Singh) seem to think that they're above the Akal Takhat and their decisions

Inder Singh - to you follow Akal Takhat? Equal amount of shame on you

When Guru sahib was Guru of sikhs he was everything.I hoope you get that,Mr V.

Have you seen movie Nimmo casting Darshan Lal.In this punjabi movie he promotes Dasam Granth and Hem Kunt sahib.

[tufaan_sikh]

you see these cheap punjabi movies promoting hindu rituals? shame on u.

<br />

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

<br /><br />What if the 5 pyare (Guru Ji's Saroop) tell you something different during Amrit Sanchar? e.g. meat.....<br /><br />What role did the Akaal Takht play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time, by the way?<br />

<br /><br />First - You follow your panj before anything else, but acknowledge that the Panth has made a decision on the issue, which ideally the Panj should have followed-<br /><br />Secondly - What role did Darbar Sahib play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time? I've yet to find reference pointing towards him even visiting Darbar Sahib - that doesn't make Darbar Sahib "less holy" does it?<br /><br />As for the role of Akal Takhat in our ithhas - we already know that Guru Hargobind Sahib made it with a sepcific intention. We already know that whenever there were any questions or queriees everyone turned - yes tor Akal Takhat, whether it was the issue of Bandai or Tat Khalsa, or whether Dasam Bani should be in one granth of several granths. It was always here that the Sikhs went for guidence. (practicly) all morchas in our history have started from here, whether it was against, Abdali, The British, Nehru, Indira Gandhi or against the Indian govn as a whole. It's Akal Takhat we've turned to. Not Patna Sahib, or any other takhat. It is to Akal Takhat kings like Ranjit Singh have had to submit. But nowadays polygamists (Iqbal Singh) seem to think that they're above the Akal Takhat and their decisions <img src="http://www.sikhsangat.com/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> <br /><br />Inder Singh - to you follow Akal Takhat? Equal amount of shame on you <img src="http://www.sikhsangat.com/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> <br />

<br /><br />When Guru sahib was Guru of sikhs he was everything.I hoope you get that,Mr V.<br /><br />Have you seen movie Nimmo casting Darshan Lal.In this punjabi movie he promotes Dasam Granth and Hem Kunt sahib.<br />

<br /><br /><br />

[Inder Singh]

you see these cheap punjabi movies promoting hindu rituals? shame on u.

<br />

I have to agree with V, you have to accept ALL the rulings of Akal Takht and not just pick and choose the ones that are in line with your Jatha. People who pick and choose have not credibility and are just playing their little games.

<br /><br />What if the 5 pyare (Guru Ji's Saroop) tell you something different during Amrit Sanchar? e.g. meat.....<br /><br />What role did the Akaal Takht play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time, by the way?<br />

<br /><br />First - You follow your panj before anything else, but acknowledge that the Panth has made a decision on the issue, which ideally the Panj should have followed-<br /><br />Secondly - What role did Darbar Sahib play during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time? I've yet to find reference pointing towards him even visiting Darbar Sahib - that doesn't make Darbar Sahib "less holy" does it?<br /><br />As for the role of Akal Takhat in our ithhas - we already know that Guru Hargobind Sahib made it with a sepcific intention. We already know that whenever there were any questions or queriees everyone turned - yes tor Akal Takhat, whether it was the issue of Bandai or Tat Khalsa, or whether Dasam Bani should be in one granth of several granths. It was always here that the Sikhs went for guidence. (practicly) all morchas in our history have started from here, whether it was against, Abdali, The British, Nehru, Indira Gandhi or against the Indian govn as a whole. It's Akal Takhat we've turned to. Not Patna Sahib, or any other takhat. It is to Akal Takhat kings like Ranjit Singh have had to submit. But nowadays polygamists (Iqbal Singh) seem to think that they're above the Akal Takhat and their decisions <img src="http://www.sikhsangat.com/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> <br /><br />Inder Singh - to you follow Akal Takhat? Equal amount of shame on you <img src="http://www.sikhsangat.com/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=" " border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> <br />

<br /><br />When Guru sahib was Guru of sikhs he was everything.I hoope you get that,Mr V.<br /><br />Have you seen movie Nimmo casting Darshan Lal.In this punjabi movie he promotes Dasam Granth and Hem Kunt sahib.<br />

<br /><br /><br />

Tufan

How do you know that i have seen this Punjabi movie.I live in th west for the past 30 years and have no access this movie.This i read on the net.

Shame on you for saying something that you are not sure of.Shame on Namak Haram darshan lal who minted money on sikh donations and then stabbed them in the back.

[sahib_bindra]

hey man wat up wid ur non sense of darshan lall...if this guy follows all the directives of sikhism ...u just cant take away his right of being a sikh because he commented to on bani.......u r no one to decide that....let god decide that....taking his name away from him is a challenge to god....shame on u first of all.....do u have a problem with ppl staying in harmony...and stop using foul language...atleast have repect for an elder if not for his personality....