Jump to content

Love vs emotional attachment


Guest mehtab
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest mehtab

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Another amazing email sent by Summeet Kaur bhainjee

In material consciousness, many of us have taken love equal to our emotional attachment or lust for worldly objects.

There is a huge difference between these two which can be summarized as follows.

Attachment is born of false egoism and pure love is born of true understanding;

attachment is darkness or falsehood, love is light or Truth;

attachment binds and love liberates;

attachment feeds egoism and love dissolves it;

attachment breads fear and hatred and love promotes courage and sacrifice;

attachment is possessiveness and love is freedom or Nirvaana;

attachment controls other person and love sets that person free to grow;

attachment is hurt and love is forgiveness and compassion;

attachment is churning ignorance or stupidity and love is churning learning in wisdom;

attachment is ugliness and love is Spiritual beauty;

attachment is inner filth or impurity and love is Purity;

attachment is weakness and love is Spiritual power;

attachment is birth-death cycle and love is Immortality;

attachment clouds our judgment and love helps us to be objective;

in attachment we pamper the other person when his actions gratify our egoism, but in love we are alert enough to caution the other person against unhealthy habits;

in attachment there is the noise of gain and loss, and in love there is Spiritual silence;

attachment breeds personal misery and disappointment and love knows the reality of sufferin

g;

attachment is body-consciousness ("I, me, mine, you") or selfishness and love is Pure Awareness or Immaculate Self;

attachment is desire and craving, and love is desirelessness and detachment;

attachment is sense gratification and love is Higher Taste;

attachment is evil and love is Divinity;

attachment is restlessness and love is intuitively balanced mind;

Attachment is differences and love is unity;

attachment is exploitation and love is cooperation;

attachment is fanaticism and bigotry and prejudices, and love is Oneness;

attachment is "taking" and love is "giving"; and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article

(See for full article)

I'm not saying that other love is true Manjot Singh Veerji rolleyes.gif here is what the article is telling us:

As long as there is attachment to material pleasure, there can be no true

love (sggs 328). Listen all, I tell you the Truth: One who practices

love attains God (Paatshaahee 10). One who performs selfless

service, without thought of reward, will attain God (sggs 286).

Without love, there is no devotional worship (sggs 67).

The Gurbani (SGGS) asks us to see God in man and everything else because the same One Reality pervades all. Hence, as universal love, each one of us is seated in the Heart of all beings and they in us. The practical implication is that we must selflessly love and do good to all the creatures. If we do not love, we cannot know God; for God is love. What it means is that if we do not love all the creatures, we cannot love God. Therefore, whatever little good we do with a pure heart and in a spirit of love to all the beings, that little behavior and conduct will help us to gradually to attain universal love, leading to achieving inner peace and realizing God within our own Heart.

Since God is simply love, He would very much like us to be inspired by love. Hence, knowing "God is love" is not enough, we must practice this love. Otherwise there is no meaning to it. In fact one's body without love becomes his own enemy. To love or serve God is to

selflessly love His creation. The purpose of spirituality or what we call "religion" is mainly to understand Oneness of all beings and live the life of harmony. In fact if we look at the glorious lives of all Spiritual Giants, they taught us to look for opportunities for giving unconditional love. In fact that's all they had — selfless love! Therefore, if we truly want to honor and spread the message of all such great souls then we should not look for love or truth, deliver It! In true religion or spirituality, therefore, there is no competition with others; only cooperation in love!

Read the article for more bani and vichaar... :@

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use