Jump to content

Are Their Any 'alien Sikhs'


apne
 Share

Recommended Posts

you should be quite ashamed putting sant jarnail singh bhindranwale as your avtar picture yet not beleiving what he beleived.. taksal firmly beleives sri guru gobind singh ji had more than one wife along with puratan samparda's.

Having 'more than one wife' and having 'multiple wives' is different. Having more than one wife is not bad. It was only in 20th century that it became a social burden as ordinary man neither has the vitality or the means to keep two wives.

All important persons before 1900 had two, three, four or ten wives. Today there are multiple divorces and subsequent marriages in the West. Is it not more than one wives. Only in middle ages they did not divorce.

If 'Draupadi' can have five husbands why cannot a man have more than one wife. Is it a crime? , infact it was a charity in middle ages, to feed and keep happy someones daughter (we all know the condition of women in middle ages).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Krishna was cool. He was a player!

Sri guru gobind singh ji had multiple wives as well along with previous guru's ... what you trying to say man?

Avtars of vahiguroo whether in form of poran guru avtar- sri guru nanak dev ji or hari avtar- krishan or ram chandar ji or narsingh avtars have done extraordinary things which mere mortals have again again judged them according to our own little closed box standards.

:@ get your facts right, shri guru gobind singh ji and other gurus did not had multiple wives.

you should be quite ashamed putting sant jarnail singh bhindranwale as your avtar picture yet not beleiving what he beleived.. taksal firmly beleives sri guru gobind singh ji had more than one wife along with puratan samparda's.

so if taksal believes it then im suppose to believe it too :gg: . From what i know guru sahib had only one wife, but i could be wrong, so tell me why u think/know guru sahib had more than one wife.

already been discussed before with sources, just search this forum.. you will come up with sources.

you should be quite ashamed putting sant jarnail singh bhindranwale as your avtar picture yet not beleiving what he beleived.. taksal firmly beleives sri guru gobind singh ji had more than one wife along with puratan samparda's.

Having 'more than one wife' and having 'multiple wives' is different. Having more than one wife is not bad. It was only in 20th century that it became a social burden as ordinary man neither has the vitality or the means to keep two wives.

All important persons before 1900 had two, three, four or ten wives. Today there are multiple divorces and subsequent marriages in the West. Is it not more than one wives. Only in middle ages they did not divorce.

If 'Draupadi' can have five husbands why cannot a man have more than one wife. Is it a crime? , infact it was a charity in middle ages, to feed and keep happy someones daughter (we all know the condition of women in middle ages).

sorry poor choice of words i guess..gotta be politically correct dont want to hurt anyones sharda- i rephrase- having more than one wife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

apne

There is no 'avtaar' of vahiguru. Was Muhammed a pooran guru avtaar of vahiguru?

acha sachi? i didnt know there was no avtar of vahiguroo. why don't you tell us the concept of sargun/nirgun in gurbani? why don't you tell arths of following gurbani tuks from sri guru granth sahib ji, sri dasam patsah bachans, bhai gurdas ji varan:

Jab Jab Arsat Hot Sansara ||

Tab Tab Deh Dharat Avtara (Sri Dasam Granth Sahib )

Sargun Nirgun Nirankar Sun Smadhi aap apie kiya nanaka apie fer jaap (Shalok from Sukhmani sahib 21st asthpadi)

Jag Jag Satgur Dharie Avatari || (Bhai Gurdas Ji varr)

who in the flipping hell talking about muhammed sahib now? stick to your statement which you claimed- there is no avtar of vahiguroo.

I know people like you who have 'hindu background' and who hate Muslims esp. Muhammed. Where is it stated that Krishna (debaucher) was pooran guru avtaar of vahiguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

apne

There is no 'avtaar' of vahiguru. Was Muhammed a pooran guru avtaar of vahiguru?

acha sachi? i didnt know there was no avtar of vahiguroo. why don't you tell us the concept of sargun/nirgun in gurbani? why don't you tell arths of following gurbani tuks from sri guru granth sahib ji, sri dasam patsah bachans, bhai gurdas ji varan:

Jab Jab Arsat Hot Sansara ||

Tab Tab Deh Dharat Avtara (Sri Dasam Granth Sahib )

Sargun Nirgun Nirankar Sun Smadhi aap apie kiya nanaka apie fer jaap (Shalok from Sukhmani sahib 21st asthpadi)

Jag Jag Satgur Dharie Avatari || (Bhai Gurdas Ji varr)

who in the flipping hell talking about muhammed sahib now? stick to your statement which you claimed- there is no avtar of vahiguroo.

I know people like you who have 'hindu background' and who hate Muslims esp. Muhammed. Where is it stated that Krishna (debaucher) was pooran guru avtaar of vahiguru.

LOL.. i have no hindu background yaar, i do not hate muslims at all.. i love mysticism of all religions...as far as krishna being avtar i wouldnt say poran avtar but krishna being avtar of vahiguroo is mentioned.. just read bhai gurdas ji varan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL.. i have no hindu background yaar, i do not hate muslims at all.. i love mysticism of all religions...as far as krishna being avtar i wouldnt say poran avtar but krishna being avtar of vahiguroo is mentioned.. just read bhai gurdas ji varan.

looks like you don't have 'sikh background' either. And you love 'mysticism' not 'sikhi'. As for bhai gurdas vaaran, it is not 'gurbani'. I will take what guru sahib said and not what his disciples thought ,i will use them for increasing knowledge but not to get influenced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it wrong to be of Hindu background on this forum ?

is it cardinal sin ?

Everyone is accusing each other of being Hindu.

& suddenly people get defensive and say .. "No yaar, I am not Hindu .. I am so & so .. but not Hindu"

how pathetic is this ?

Why can't we respect people of all religions ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it wrong to be of Hindu background on this forum ?

is it cardinal sin ?

Everyone is accusing each other of being Hindu.

& suddenly people get defensive and say .. "No yaar, I am not Hindu .. I am so & so .. but not Hindu"

how pathetic is this ?

Why can't we respect people of all religions ?

When people come on a forum to contaminate Sikhs gyan then it is a problem of any religion when they should go make a forum that fits their agendas.

If a christian came to your house just to yell nonsense through your window, are you going to say something? When Chunch gyani's come on the forum of any religion they must be recognised as having their background so we can understand what misconceptions they were mislead by of Sikh knowledge, if its caste belief or any bias nonsense it shows etc.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it wrong to be of Hindu background on this forum ?

is it cardinal sin ?

Everyone is accusing each other of being Hindu.

& suddenly people get defensive and say .. "No yaar, I am not Hindu .. I am so & so .. but not Hindu"

how pathetic is this ?

Why can't we respect people of all religions ?

Raju, it is not wrong to be a Hindu , in the same way that it is not wrong to be an Atheist. This board, i feel, like sikhi caters to all kind of people, from whatever background.

But occassionaly you will come across certain types of posts that try to trace Sikhi to Sanatan Dharma (hinduism) and put Gurus at par with 'avtaars' (demi gods). These type of posts come from people with 'certain background' that want to undermine people from 'other backgrounds'. That creates problems.

Every sikh respects each and every religion, equally and not preferentially. And nor should he balk from speaking plain truth even if people from 'certain background' take offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a christian came to your house just to yell nonsense through your window, are you going to say something? When Chunch gyani's come on the forum of any religion they must be recognised as having their background so we can understand what misconceptions they were mislead by of Sikh knowledge, if its caste belief or any bias nonsense it shows etc.....

I am personally not bothered if any Christian came to my house to yell nonsense. You know there are evangelists who want to convert everyone to their fellowship. Similarly there are Pentecostals who want to convert everyone.

If they gain entry, I just say I am not interested.

Instead of casting aspersions at their background, which might not be in good taste.

Look, if one is confident of one's identity then we are not bothered by anyone talking whatever. We just walk away.

Raju, it is not wrong to be a Hindu , in the same way that it is not wrong to be an Atheist. This board, i feel, like sikhi caters to all kind of people, from whatever background.

But occassionaly you will come across certain types of posts that try to trace Sikhi to Sanatan Dharma (hinduism) and put Gurus at par with 'avtaars' (demi gods). These type of posts come from people with 'certain background' that want to undermine people from 'other backgrounds'. That creates problems.

Every sikh respects each and every religion, equally and not preferentially. And nor should he balk from speaking plain truth even if people from 'certain background' take offence.

what's wrong in people interpreting Guru's according to their faith.

You know the Catholics interpret Jesus differently, the Protestants interpret Jesus differently .. but it hardly makes a difference to anyone.

Why is this being turned into an existential crises ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use