Jump to content

Namdhari Exposed: Alliance With Anti-sikh Forces


guptveer1469
 Share

Recommended Posts

Photos thanks to Bhai Harvinder Singh Southall

2m2hslz.jpg

Jagjit Sinh Namdhari with Sajjan Kumar, killer of Sikhs in Delhi.

308lhu9.jpg

Jagjit Sinh Namdhari with RK Narayan, a person accused in the Delhi anti Sikh riots of 1984.

20rodpe.jpg

Jagjit Sinh Namdhari with Indira Gandhi.

33bmts8.jpg

Jagjit Sinh Namdhari with Chandra Shekar [indian PM who said: ""You do not know the might of our armed forces. We will eliminate 10,000 sikh youths and the world will know nothing of it" (Chander Shekhar, former Prime Minister of India, 1991)]

n2mlo0.jpg

Jagjit Sinh Namdhari with Gurcharan Sinh Tohra (a person who betrayed Sikh Nation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Greetings

I have a photo taken with Amy Winehouse, so therefore it is obvious I have an alliance with her, and it is also obvious that I take drugs and socialise with her, because im in a photo with her, also it is obvious I have led to her downfall.

Sorry just applying the same logic applied by others on this topic

Regards

Dilrubarb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings

In reply to post #7, good point , well made.

What also must be considered is where the pictures were taken, i.e. at the namdhari headquarters or at the location of the guys. Also regarding the picture with ms gandhi, it is not dated so one cannot be sure when the photo is taken

In reply to post #8, could you please elaborate why my post doesnt make sense

also i would like to ask mr bond singh ji if he is namdhari ? how are you acquiring these photos ?

I hope mr bond singh that this post meets the level of thought you require for me to have to submit it

regards

Dilrubarb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use