Jump to content

Just Plain Sikh


jasleen k
 Share

Recommended Posts

i was reviewing the forum guidelines http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=9119, and i made a realization.

i notice that we are asked not to make insulting remarks about any jatha or samparda. however, there is nothing said about people of these jathas/sampardae making insulting remarks about the rest of the panth.

i have noticed a trend in here, that people of the various jathas sampardae do not respect the panthic rehat maryada endorsed by Akal Takht. instead, they belittle it, constantly calling it "SGPC maryada" (which it is not) and suggesting that it's contents are less valid than their own maryada. while i respect their right to their own beliefs, i do not think they represent those of the panth as a whole, and i do not think it is acceptable or necessary to insult Akal Takht or the panth in every thread.

despite what it may look like on this particular online forum, the vast majority of Sikhs do not belong to sects or groups, we're just Sikhs. writing off our views as wrong, belittleing the panthic rehat maryada... who is this helping? how is this making us better Sikhs?

what ever happened to ekta?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No No No

Its all wrong

Only my Jatha is right...you know why?

  • My Jatha is the oldest
  • My Jatha was started by Gurujee Himself
  • My Jatha is the only 1 that advocates lareedaar saroop and proper maryada of giving Naam
  • Only my Jatha got it right
  • Everyone else is wrong
  • They are not even Sikh
  • They believe in the wrong number of angs of Gurujee's saroop
  • Their moolmantar is not the actual one
  • They don't even know which is the 5th kakaar
  • And they don't even know what to eat or not to eat
  • From whom to eat and from whom not to eat
  • They don't know in which utensil to make food
  • They eat from outside, oh no!!!
  • But I know it all
  • Because its my way or the highway
  • I am the only proper Sikh
  • Its evident from my turban style
  • The color of my chola gives out my avastha
  • The length of my hajuriya indicates my kamaaee
  • My kirpan size points out to the amount of simran I do
  • I never smile because I will have to pesh if I do
  • I don't even say Fateh to a Sikh of another maryada because it is a kurehit
  • I stand 15 feet away from non-Amritdharis who cut kesh, 10 feet from non-Amritdharis who keep kesh, and 40 feet from non-Sikhs because they will snatch away my bhagti

I told you..I am the only genuine Sikh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No No No

Its all wrong

Only my Jatha is right...you know why?

  • My Jatha is the oldest
  • My Jatha was started by Gurujee Himself
  • My Jatha is the only 1 that advocates lareedaar saroop and proper maryada of giving Naam
  • Only my Jatha got it right
  • Everyone else is wrong
  • They are not even Sikh
  • They believe in the wrong number of angs of Gurujee's saroop
  • Their moolmantar is not the actual one
  • They don't even know which is the 5th kakaar
  • And they don't even know what to eat or not to eat
  • From whom to eat and from whom not to eat
  • They don't know in which utensil to make food
  • They eat from outside, oh no!!!
  • But I know it all
  • Because its my way or the highway
  • I am the only proper Sikh
  • Its evident from my turban style
  • The color of my chola gives out my avastha
  • The length of my hajuriya indicates my kamaaee
  • My kirpan size points out to the amount of simran I do
  • I never smile because I will have to pesh if I do
  • I don't even say Fateh to a Sikh of another maryada because it is a kurehit
  • I stand 15 feet away from non-Amritdharis who cut kesh, 10 feet from non-Amritdharis who keep kesh, and 40 feet from non-Sikhs because they will snatch away my bhagti

I told you..I am the only genuine Sikh!!

I belong to no jatha or Gurdwara. Having said that, the SGPC and the Akal Takht are presently under the control of masands or thuggs. Things like dastaar, dietary bibek, bana and lareevar saroop are extremely important rehits and the whole panth shud follow this.

I agree that some jatha people believing in the above rehits are hankaari and treat fellow sikhs in a very wrong manner. This is their personal shortcoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I belong to no jatha or Gurdwara. Having said that, the SGPC and the Akal Takht are presently under the control of masands or thuggs. Things like dastaar, dietary bibek, bana and lareevar saroop are extremely important rehits and the whole panth shud follow this.

I agree that some jatha people believing in the above rehits are hankaari and treat fellow sikhs in a very wrong manner. This is their personal shortcoming.

Yes veeray. This is a personal shortcoming. My point is that NO MATTER if we follow different maryadas, we are ALL sons and daughters of ONE SATGURU. The way I love my parents is never going to be the same as the way my sister loves them. Does that mean I love them less? or more? Or does it mean she loves them less? Or more? No one can ever decide, not even my parents!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I belong to no jatha or Gurdwara. Having said that, the SGPC and the Akal Takht are presently under the control of masands or thuggs. Things like dastaar, dietary bibek, bana and lareevar saroop are extremely important rehits and the whole panth shud follow this.

I agree that some jatha people believing in the above rehits are hankaari and treat fellow sikhs in a very wrong manner. This is their personal shortcoming.

Yes veeray. This is a personal shortcoming. My point is that NO MATTER if we follow different maryadas, we are ALL sons and daughters of ONE SATGURU. The way I love my parents is never going to be the same as the way my sister loves them. Does that mean I love them less? or more? Or does it mean she loves them less? Or more? No one can ever decide, not even my parents!

Veer, I will go a step further. We shud love all amritdharis and we shud also love monas or non amritdharis who do seva of the panth. Sukha and Jinda were clean shaven when they sent general vaidya to hell. These clean shaven punjabis are much better than the haramkhor selfish hankari bana wearing sarbloh bibekis who used khalistan movement to settle in west, run after nri bibis for immigration, lie at embassies, dont do any kirt and eat from the dasvandh of the sangat, train their daughters to hunt NRI's or rich boys at smagams, do nindiya of great sikhs like Baba Jarnail Singh Jee Bhindrawale,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I belong to no jatha or Gurdwara. Having said that, the SGPC and the Akal Takht are presently under the control of masands or thuggs.

that said, it is not mean that the Amrit of Guru ji is somehow invalid or "not as good" if it was received according to Akal Takht maryada. Amrit is Amrit. it also doesn't mean that the maryada we follow is invalid or lesser or should be laughed at.

which is exactly what's happening on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every one of us belongs to some type of jatha or group, even the “vast majority” that follow Sikh Rehit Maryada. I think we all know the history of how the whole panth did not come to a consensus on one single Rehit Maryada. In fact, most puratan groups (sampardas) do not follow SGPC approved SRM because it doesn’t address all of their traditional values. That said, most of the Gurmukhs and Sants from these sampardas/jathas never advocate belittling the SRM.

My only problem is when people start passing off the SRM as the “Panth-parvaan” and sideline all others as being fringe or sect maryadas. What exactly is left of the panth when most, if not all, of its traditional schools of thought don’t accept it in its entirety. Doesn’t matter how many professor or scholars support it as being the correct, most of the panth’s sampardas don’t accept it fully and deem it incomplete.

As far as bringing in Sri Akaal Takht sahib, we need to realize the issue isn’t simple as it appears. Whatever group controls the office of Akaal Takht sahib, they are able to impose their views. Currently it’s the SGPC. Why not give control of Takht sahib back to the Akali-Nihangs? Will everyone agree to the Nihang-singh maryada if that happens?

End of the day, everyone is going to follow whatever view feels most correct. It could be Nihang, Taksali, Nirmal, or Missionary maryada.

What we can do is make a resolution adopting some basic points:

- Not belittling another gursikhs chosen maryada

- Not flaunting own chosen maryada as being superior

- Accepting that the panth has diverse views about the Rehit Maryada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veeray a good number of monnay have 1 million times more pyar and shardha for Gurujee than an outward looking so-called Amritdhari Singh like me. Why they are monnay only Gurujee knows. Maybe its their karam or bhaag, or maybe Maharaj wants us to learn not to judge a book by its cover. I have seen so many examples, be it Punjabi monnay from Sikh families, be it Punjabi Hindus, or even non-Punjabi Hindus from other Indian states. Their innocent and spotless love makes me feel ashamed of myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use