Jump to content

Who Is Allowed?


Traveller
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

"in puratan maryada--rehitnamas etc, even a Sikh woman is not permitted to sit on

the throne with Guru Granth Sahib ji, so I don't see why a non-Sikh would be able to,"

any references bhai sahib?

just as you cannot imagine maharaj stopping a non sikh from performing kirtan i cannot imagine maharaj not allowing a rehitvan bibi to perform their seva. infact to suggest a bibi not be allowed to sit on tabiya just because she is a bibi is more outrageous than preventing non amritdharis from leading the sangat in my humble opinion.

i know some puratan jathebandia only allow bibia to do akhand paaht seva after a set number of singhs cannot be found, but even this system reaks of inequality.

furthermore, whether it be kirtan or akhand paahts, the common denominator is still gurbani. in gurbani, kirtan is held in very high regard and so i would think kirtan maryada in a darbar would be just as strict as akhand paaht da maryada.

i think guru sahibs appearance has changed over time, i.e in style of dastar etc. kesh was certainly a definate nishaani.

guru sahib at times had stones thrown at them on their udhaasis, this in my opinion suggests guru sahib stood out from the crowd some how. i have full faith guru sahibans wore dastara in keeping with the gurbani lines quoted by sunny, the rest only guru sahib knows

bhul chuk maaf

gurfateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey!!

Just logged on to find some great discussions going on...

I was hoping someone could give some references to rules which dictate who can do kirtan...

obviously kirtan in a khalsa organisation would have to be performed by a member of the khalsa...

the point was...my friends have been threatened to not perform kirtan on stage by a certain group of gursikhs-not committee members...they do not think it is acceptable that a non-amritdhari should do this....the people in question are well known and respected members of the community...

defining between a non amrtidhari and a kesdhari seems ridiculous... as anyone can be a kesdhari or turban walla...wearing a turban or a ramaal is just culture either way unless by kesdhari you mean specifically tying a gursikh pagh...

also...what is a patit? what has to happen for someone to be labelled this and why is there no place in guru ji's darbar for such a person to do seva...

like I asked before...if someone was sitting by the prashaad who was non-amritdhari (and non kesdhari if its such a big deal to visual people) then would you accept prashaad off them or would this also be seen as something terrible for sikhi...

Reading this topic shows that maybe sikhi is turning more into a cult than an embracing belief system? Why is judging others so profilerant and tolerated?

Just observations from the various view points others have expressed in this topic.....

...its scary to think its all based on individual people to decide whether someone who is of another faith or non amrtidhari can actually be heard doing kirtan in the Gurdwara...shouldnt there be declarations for these kind of things...or is the religion based on whatever people want to change things to and interpret things as in these cases?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Traveller,

As I stated before,

the only organization I have seen where this is an issue has been

with the AKJ at Gurdwaras where they have a sizeable majority,

I have never seen this elsewhere, if people are making such problems

that is un-Sikh and not right, if it gets too bad just go to a Nanaksar Gurdwara,

I know they don't care about people's appearences on the stage.

a patit is an Amritdhari Sikh who commits a Bujjhar Kuriet i.e he breaks his Amrit by cutting his hair

and he does not rejoin the Panth by doing pesh,

such a person is basically an outcaste,

but if they do pesh and accept the tankyia seva given to them and re-take their vows,

they can again become Amritdhari.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Chaupa Singh Rehitnama under the Guru Granth Sahib protocal section,

the last line reads: "a woman should never read the Granth Sahib in any Sikh assembly".

No self-respecting purataan jathebandi would disregard this.

This same Rehitnama also says keski is kakkar - all sampardas rightly reject that so why accept the bit about women doing paath? My point is that the authenticity of parts of our Rehitnamas is questionable, especially when they go against Gurbani.

There are deras from puratan sampardas (e.g. Bhai Daya Singh Ji Samparda) which are run and managed by bibiyan - and at times have amritdhari bibiyan doing paath during Akhand Paaths etc, if the bibiyan can manage. They still don't do 5 Pyare seva though, but we digress.

Nihung Dals, as far as know also prohibit non-amritdharis from doing Akhand Paath duties, but I don't think the same applies for kirtan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use