Jump to content

Guru Nanak called a Devil on the BBC


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ignorance are people that dont wanna know. This is more about Propaganda war. Islamics want the whole world to be Islam, theres no douth about that. But there are good Muslims out there, some are peaceful ppl and want Islamic land without force or stupid tatics, but some more miliant Muslims would try to take land by force and try to be conning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs outraged by radio remark May 14 2004

By Samantha Nanda

The BBC has been dubbed "irresponsible" by the Sikh community in Coventry after a guest on a radio show said she had read that Guru Nanak Singh, the founder of Sikhism, was Satan.

The guest, referred to only as "Kiri", was speaking on the Sonia Deol show on the BBC's Asian Network on Tuesday.

Dalwinder Singh, 28, Coventry representative of the British Organisation of Sikh Students, is among hundreds of British Sikhs who say they're outraged by the comment.

IT analyst Mr Singh, of Keresley, said the BBC should broadcast a programme clarifying the make-up of the Sikh religion - and said the woman responsible for the comment should have had to give her full name.

"This has a terrible, negative impact on Sikhs - ignorance is what leads to violence and this should not have been allowed to go out as it promotes intolerance," said Mr Singh.

"What was said is extremely offensive and the BBC should have screened their guests better because, by not giving her name, the caller was not responsible for her words.

"The BBC should make up for this by having a more informative programme on the Sikh religion."

Mohan Singh, chairman of the Sikh Research Trust, a national organisation, said the comments were an attack at the "heart of Sikhism".

Speaking on behalf of organisations including the Council of Sikh Gurdwaras Coventry, Mr Singh said: "Calling the founder of the Sikh religion Satan is unbelievable - how could the BBC have allowed this to happen?"

A BBC spokeswoman said the show had included two guests with families including people of

different faiths chosen to discuss their family situations.

"One guest made some totally unplanned and unexpected comments about the Sikh faith which we recognise were extremely offensive," the spokeswoman said.

"Our presenter, Sonia Deol, immediately challenged those views and the producer allowed calls from both Muslim and Sikh listeners, who were outraged by her comments.

"The BBC of course sincerely apologises for the offence caused and the guest in question will not appear again on the Asian Network."

The British Sikh Consult-tative Forum, set to meet in Birmingham, said the comments from the show would be at the top of its agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GOT THIS IN AN E-MAIL:

BBC asian network allowed a girl who pretended to be Sikh discriminate our religion and our gurus, what if we had discriminated Islam we would be off the air within seconds!

On Tuesday 11th May 2004 on the BBC Asian Network programme, which Sonia Deol

presented from 9am to 12.00.

Guru Nanak, the first Guru of the Sikhs was called a devil. And other derogatory

comments were made regarding the Sikh religion.

After listening to the programme, it seems to me that this girl wasn’t even

Sikh, she had no knowledge of Sikhi, which even a 5 year old would know.

She had claimed that she was considering conversion to Islam, but it was obvious

that she already regarded herself as a Muslim, as she frequently used the phase

“we Muslims....”

We therefore had on this show a Muslim girl insulting the Sikh religion live on

the BBC. So this is where our taxes are going?

And without jumping to conclusions, it seen quite obvious that she was in fact a

Muslim, and was only on the show to insult Sikhs. And that the extremist views

which she was allowed expressed live on air, are the same as those expressed by

some banned Islamic organisation in the UK.

So why was she allowed on this show?

Surly the BBC would have some vetting procedure?

This cannot be tolerated.

Special thanks to www.shaheedkhalsa.com, for the recording and uploading of the

programme

Click on the links below to listen (right click to save as).

Mp3

Prelude to the show - Part 1 - http://www.shaheedkhalsa.com/part1.mp3

Live Show - Part 2 - http://www.shaheedkhalsa.com/part2.mp3

Closing comments - Part 3 - http://www.shaheedkhalsa.com/part3.mp3

Real Player

Full Programme

http://www.shaheedkhalsa.com/BBCAsianNetwork.rm

Full Programme Streamed (to listen instantly)

http://www.shaheedkhalsa.com/BBCAsianNetwork.ram

The BBC Asian Network are refusing to take our complaints now, and have refused

to release a copy of the radio show

People are always asking, “how can we do seva, “we want to get involved” etc

## Act now. Please email the BBC direct to register you complaint. Use this form

- ## http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/contactus/serious_form.shtml

And call her live on her show too, see below for details.

Call Sonia on 08459 440445,

Text Sonia on 07786 202001

Email Sonia at sonia@bbc.co.uk

We need to get thousands to responded to have a impact

http://groups.msn.com/SikhsInUk/

http://groups.msn.com/SikhsAroundTheWorld

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone is taking this too far and in the wrong direction.

1) BBC didnt know she was going to say that. So you cant blame them for wat she said.

2) It wasnt her falut, it was her so called Sikh father's for not teaching her anything and yet still trying to pretend to be a sikh.

The BBC Asian Network are refusing to take our complaints now, and have refused

to release a copy of the radio show

People are always asking, “how can we do seva, “we want to get involved” etc

## Act now. Please email the BBC direct to register you complaint. Use this form

- ## http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/contactus/serious_form.shtml

And call her live on her show too, see below for details.

Call Sonia on 08459 440445,

Text Sonia on 07786 202001

Email Sonia at sonia@bbc.co.uk

We need to get thousands to responded to have a impact

http://groups.msn.com/SikhsInUk/

http://groups.msn.com/SikhsAroundTheWorld

I have noticed that we allow such things to happen then once they happen, we start wasting out time by doing things like above, that wont have any impact on wats already has happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use