Jump to content

Dreaming Of Unity


AK-47
 Share

Recommended Posts

Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh

Ekta is a word which along with panthic is thrown around a lot.

I say this with no disrespect to those who are arranging kirtan programmes and inviting people from different groups or people doing other similar events, but I feel this needs to be said. On a completely results only basis, how much do these events actually help? Do they actually create unity, or just highlight the fact that despite us looking the same, there are jathebandia differences between us?

Having attended and seen these events over the last few years, if im honest I dont think there was much ekta created. This may just be my own personal opinion, but thats my honest observation. People turn up, listen to/do kirtan and go home. If you asked most of the kirtanis to attend any event organised by anyone, they would probably still attend. So calling different ones to one programe, doesnt mean a great deal. The kirtanis very very rarely represent their 'group' they just happen to be associated from one rather than another and have little influence over people (sad but true). People also feel that they need to turn up, as if they dont, they will be seen as anti panthic/anti ekta but they dont really want to. Again, not nice, but its the truth.

The people who have influence, or who make decisions regarding jathebandia are the ones that need to be doing something to create unity. Yet these people will rarely meet. Going to a 'sanjha samgam' and then going home and still cussing each other achieves nothing. And as I said, on a results basis, I see no increase in the levels of unity over the last few years. If anything things have got worse and worse.

Creating unity will not be done by organising kirtan darbars, sorry to say. If people use the example of Sant Kartar Singh Ji and the AKJ doing progs together then we need to stop and see what these events where. They were an EXPRESSION of solidarity, an EXPRESSION of unity, an EXAMPLE of brotherhood. I do not believe that they were to create unity, i belive that unity was already there. To create unity means having difficult conversations and coming to agreements over disagreeing over certain issues and agreeing on others. It means accepting differences and possibly finding ways around them, or even ignoring them for the beneift of the 'panth'. These extremely difficult conversations and then the even harder job of encouraging others to follow the decisions is perhaps a better way to create unity.

Sometimes we think that a common enemy will unite us against him. But history past and present shows us that this is also not true. We will still align ourselves with our groups and malign others whilst trying to claim ownership over any successful actions.

Creating unity in a people is one of the greatest challenges of mankind. Whether it be in issues of faith (look at how often other religious groups have splits and dont get along), or issues of nationhood (look at the countries we live in, there are people who dont get along, and hate each other, different political parties, diff pressure groups, etc), even families are not united. Unity seems to be a temporary thing usually in the face of adversity, eg unity (to an extent under Sant Ji), unity under Nelson Mandela, unity under Ghenghis Khan even! Once the issue/problem is dealt with, disunity kicks in again.

Sorry once again if this sounds pessimistic and I assure you the purpose is not to say sanjha smagams etc are pointless, but rather to stress that I dont think it is enough to think these will create unity. Recent events have reallly strained things and a kirtan darbar will not solve things. Honest, open, productive, genuine, conversations and dialogue with humility will. But again the pessimist within me doesnt think that will happen any time soon. Ekta is a dream that is a long way off, for now get as much laha from gurbani and kirtan and do ardas if you want, unity wont happen until and if maharajh wants it to.

Sometimes those shouting the loudest for ekta and unity are the ones whispering the quietest about how other groups/jathe are wrong for various reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you on this we really need to educate and have discussions with our own people that is the only way we can become unified as one. We can build probably the biggest Gurdwara but yet we cannot educate our own people or even have discussions with them that can bring them closer to Sikhi. In Todays world we are divided over what happened in 1984, Dasam Granth and Caste and other issues and most sikhs don't know whats right or wrong regarding these issues. We have a Sikh Channel in UK we need more Sikh Channels in more countries and be able to teach Sikhs that don't know about these issues what is wrong and what is right whether its through discussion or educational programming that is the only way we will be united as one.

Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh

Ekta is a word which along with panthic is thrown around a lot.

I say this with no disrespect to those who are arranging kirtan programmes and inviting people from different groups or people doing other similar events, but I feel this needs to be said. On a completely results only basis, how much do these events actually help? Do they actually create unity, or just highlight the fact that despite us looking the same, there are jathebandia differences between us?

Having attended and seen these events over the last few years, if im honest I dont think there was much ekta created. This may just be my own personal opinion, but thats my honest observation. People turn up, listen to/do kirtan and go home. If you asked most of the kirtanis to attend any event organised by anyone, they would probably still attend. So calling different ones to one programe, doesnt mean a great deal. The kirtanis very very rarely represent their 'group' they just happen to be associated from one rather than another and have little influence over people (sad but true). People also feel that they need to turn up, as if they dont, they will be seen as anti panthic/anti ekta but they dont really want to. Again, not nice, but its the truth.

The people who have influence, or who make decisions regarding jathebandia are the ones that need to be doing something to create unity. Yet these people will rarely meet. Going to a 'sanjha samgam' and then going home and still cussing each other achieves nothing. And as I said, on a results basis, I see no increase in the levels of unity over the last few years. If anything things have got worse and worse.

Creating unity will not be done by organising kirtan darbars, sorry to say. If people use the example of Sant Kartar Singh Ji and the AKJ doing progs together then we need to stop and see what these events where. They were an EXPRESSION of solidarity, an EXPRESSION of unity, an EXAMPLE of brotherhood. I do not believe that they were to create unity, i belive that unity was already there. To create unity means having difficult conversations and coming to agreements over disagreeing over certain issues and agreeing on others. It means accepting differences and possibly finding ways around them, or even ignoring them for the beneift of the 'panth'. These extremely difficult conversations and then the even harder job of encouraging others to follow the decisions is perhaps a better way to create unity.

Sometimes we think that a common enemy will unite us against him. But history past and present shows us that this is also not true. We will still align ourselves with our groups and malign others whilst trying to claim ownership over any successful actions.

Creating unity in a people is one of the greatest challenges of mankind. Whether it be in issues of faith (look at how often other religious groups have splits and dont get along), or issues of nationhood (look at the countries we live in, there are people who dont get along, and hate each other, different political parties, diff pressure groups, etc), even families are not united. Unity seems to be a temporary thing usually in the face of adversity, eg unity (to an extent under Sant Ji), unity under Nelson Mandela, unity under Ghenghis Khan even! Once the issue/problem is dealt with, disunity kicks in again.

Sorry once again if this sounds pessimistic and I assure you the purpose is not to say sanjha smagams etc are pointless, but rather to stress that I dont think it is enough to think these will create unity. Recent events have reallly strained things and a kirtan darbar will not solve things. Honest, open, productive, genuine, conversations and dialogue with humility will. But again the pessimist within me doesnt think that will happen any time soon. Ekta is a dream that is a long way off, for now get as much laha from gurbani and kirtan and do ardas if you want, unity wont happen until and if maharajh wants it to.

Sometimes those shouting the loudest for ekta and unity are the ones whispering the quietest about how other groups/jathe are wrong for various reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a point in changing the older men and women because it is mainly the older men and women who play a vital role amongst how there kids turn out and what message is spread to the youth. If the older men and women learn something for example not to follow caste system because of some type of educational documentary then they will spread that message to the younger generation and will advise them to watch and learn this and that about sikhi. We cannot achieve unity if we are just teaching young and forgetting about the old then we will just be dividing between old and young sikhs. I have also learn't alot from sikhsangat but not everyone is as fortunate as you and i and there are alot of sikhs out there that don't have access to the internet or know about sikhsangat. Yeah there needs to be more focus on sikhi but the question is how are we going to achieve that and what needs to be done?

well said :)

There's no point trying to change the older men and women..It's the youth that need to taught

I learned alot by just visting this site once's or twice a day.

There needs to be more focus on "Sikhi" and not "punjabi" or "Jatt"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree, things were getting bad for a few years here, the singhs we all grew up with wouldnt look at each other in the same way as we did a few years ago, recent events have just made it into a dream. Lets just do our own thing now and not bother with each other as theres nothing more left to say, its all out in the open, as they say '' s.h.i.t.s hit the fan''. . . so now its time to watch the game unfold.

Ekta, a brilliant word, may satguru granth sahib jee do kirpa and this word becomes a reality when the jathedaar returns. Like in Maharaja Ranjeet Singhs times, ekta was achieved due to being scared of the Dandaa, maybe that will be required once more.

Satguru Jee Kirpa Karan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now who is going to implement his/her own words said above in his/her own real/personal life? smile.gif

Actually there is an ekta paltform/structure that exists for Panthic jathebandia's that are campiagning for Sikh Raj-Khalistan. This is the Federation of Sikh Organisations (FSO). The focus has been to work together on common issues to achieve this goal. Here we have the Various AKJ linked-organisations, i.e. former BK & Government in Exile (Gurmej -former jathedar BK), Dal Khalsa, SF (Taksal linked), Akali Dal - Mann, Khalistan Council.

Despite, a lot of people trying to breakup the FSO, it still exists and is channel for the leadership of these orgaisations to talk to each other. Will try and ask soemone who works with FSO, or is part of the FSO, for their comments and share with all at sikh sangat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

To create unity means having difficult conversations and coming to agreements over disagreeing over certain issues and agreeing on others. It means accepting differences and possibly finding ways around them, or even ignoring them for the beneift of the 'panth'. These extremely difficult conversations and then the even harder job of encouraging others to follow the decisions is perhaps a better way to create unity.

Isn’t the ‘agree to disagree’ already the case? If it wasn’t then surely one homogenous group would think itself to be so superior as to legitimize the annihilation of another homogenous group? It’s an extreme example but one which has occurred in group conflicts amongst other religions.

The Marayada of Sri Akaal Thakht Sahib Ji despite its short comings is testament to the compromises different groups of the Panth managed to achieve. Perhaps raising awareness of this Marayada would help people focus on the many similarities between groups as opposed to the few differences.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use