Jump to content

Khalistan


Wales85
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You also need to remember another very important thing Wales. Sikhs have never resorted to picking up arms without first paying a heavy price, or making a massive sacrifice. It was only after the martyrdom of the fifth Guru, Sahib Sri Arjan Dev Ji Maharaj, that the sixth Guru, Sahib Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib Ji Maharaj instructed Sikhs to raise arms against tyranny and oppression. It was only after the martyrdom of the ninth Guru, Sahib Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji Maharaj, that the tenth Guru, Sahib-E-Kamaal Dasmesh Pita Kalgidhar Shahenshah Sarbans Daani Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj ordered Sikhs to carry weapons. Problems in Punjab in the early 80s began only after the martyrdom of 13 Singhs in April 1978, and 2 events of 1984, namely Operation Bluestar in June and the widespread carnage of Sikhs in November after the assassination of Indira Gandhi was enough to blow things up beyond control. The Air India bombing which we've been discussing was blamed on Sikhs, but as suggested above, a book called "Soft Target" exposes the truth behind it. The present Indian Prime Minister who wears a turban and makes the world think he is a Sikh was shameless enough to tell the Sikhs to forget about 1984 and move on, however, in the past 2 weeks, on 2 occasions he has expressed his concern over "anti-India" and "Khalistani" activities in Canada, and has spoken twice to the Canadian premier about it. This is hypocrisy at its best, where on one hand you want people to forget the murder of 5000 plus innocents, yet you are yourself unable to forget the murder of 329 innocents, just because their murder bothers you more than that of those 5000. Its NOT a number game here, its picking sides which is the reflection of dirty Indian politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh, no problem. glad you got the answer you were looking for. any other questions you might have? or other issue that might concern you bro?

No man, im good thank you. I think I get the picture. Didn't know so I thought I would ask... only way I am gonna find out.

To previous poster I apologize for calling it riots, I will use the term genocide in any future discussion. Just didn't know.

Just saw all that stuff and got freaked out. I don't want to raise my kids in any religion that justifies the killing of innocent people for whatever reason or has problem with militancy.

Sikhi doesn't do that (except for fringe groups, like any religion)... I realize that now.. sorry for any offense but didn't know so had to ask.

Thanks,

Wales

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also need to remember another very important thing Wales. Sikhs have never resorted to picking up arms without first paying a heavy price, or making a massive sacrifice. It was only after the martyrdom of the fifth Guru, Sahib Sri Arjan Dev Ji Maharaj, that the sixth Guru, Sahib Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib Ji Maharaj instructed Sikhs to raise arms against tyranny and oppression. It was only after the martyrdom of the ninth Guru, Sahib Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji Maharaj, that the tenth Guru, Sahib-E-Kamaal Dasmesh Pita Kalgidhar Shahenshah Sarbans Daani Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj ordered Sikhs to carry weapons. Problems in Punjab in the early 80s began only after the martyrdom of 13 Singhs in April 1978, and 2 events of 1984, namely Operation Bluestar in June and the widespread carnage of Sikhs in November after the assassination of Indira Gandhi was enough to blow things up beyond control. The Air India bombing which we've been discussing was blamed on Sikhs, but as suggested above, a book called "Soft Target" exposes the truth behind it. The present Indian Prime Minister who wears a turban and makes the world think he is a Sikh was shameless enough to tell the Sikhs to forget about 1984 and move on, however, in the past 2 weeks, on 2 occasions he has expressed his concern over "anti-India" and "Khalistani" activities in Canada, and has spoken twice to the Canadian premier about it. This is hypocrisy at its best, where on one hand you want people to forget the murder of 5000 plus innocents, yet you are yourself unable to forget the murder of 329 innocents, just because their murder bothers you more than that of those 5000. Its NOT a number game here, its picking sides which is the reflection of dirty Indian politics.

Thanks for the reply.

I did not know any of that. I realize my ignorance on this matter... to be honest I was just trying to determine if sikhi justified killing innocents for religion. I realize I was way off base. The plight of sikh people is very important, I just don't know much about it. Again, apologies if my ignorance comes off as being a <banned word filter activated>.

-W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shastr

wales, you dont have to be sorry for anything. you simply didnt know the facts. and also, to be honest, you dont have to worry about rasing ur kids up in a religion with militancy or killing or wat ever you want to call it, becasue majority of sikhs right now are the same way. if you speak to any of the people who saw 1984, they will all tell you the same thing, they dont want to see it happen again.

theres a saying, "let the lions worry about doing the hunting" i think ur smart enough to figure it out.

but one bit of advice, dont believe anything you see put up by indian officials, or gov. against sikhs or sikh history. theres a 99.9% chance that its false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalistan is not an issue is Canada. And Air India bombing has and always will be condemned by the Sikhs. There is no justification for killing any innocent person, in Sikhi and is wrong. It's the other way around, save the innocent and put your own life at risk.

Not a single Sikh in all of history has killed an innocent to even recieve a penny.

(though we as sikhs deny it there are terrorist elements in sikhi as there is in all religions)

adhyatmic, where is this coming from? You need to explain this so others can understand your point here, which in my mind is absolutely false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After consisitent attacks on Dasam Granth by many rogue khalistanis such as dal khalsa, Counicl of khalistan,

Khailstan calling, sikh youth of America etc this movement has been maligned.

This is no more issue before us as the movement has been hijacked by rogues who have no love for sikhism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use