Jump to content

New Bhindranwale Track


Bir_Rass
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just couldn't enjoy it....maybe it was the fact that they didn't follow any of the teachings of Sant Ji and cut their hair.

I don't get it, why tie a dastar, if you don't have any khes?

yer i kno ur right, but i see this as a sign to wake us up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are all Sikhs the day we start all this oh we're better they're not and so on is the day for victory for India against Sikhs,we need songs like this and singers like this to reach out to the mainstream population of Sikhs who can't relate to say a Kathavachik in a Gurdwara any propaganda in favour of Shaheed Sant Bhindranwale or Khalistan should be appreciated as it will help gain support and awareness of the movement of freedom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does have a good message (somewhat) but I can just see the alcohol drinking monkeys jumping up and down on this track at their monkey bashes. The problem today is that this new monkey generation is all about living in the moment and in this moment this track is the new thing and next couple of days or weeks another track about alcohol and girls will come out and these dancing monkeys will start jumping up and down to it. This track will be forgotten like it never was sung. The singers themselves will sit around a table with open alcohol talking about Sant ji and in the same moment pick up a glass and pound back a couple of shots and then go on with their lives, with nothing changing in their lives. Same old wacky hair cuts and same old drinking habits.

Sikhi is not about singing about great Saints or telling others about great Saints or even about a Dastaar. It's about moving forward in Sikhi permanently. Not to keep a dastar for a song and then take it off. What does that show? Don't you think the guy listening doesn't know your just doing it for one song. If anything this is moving backwards in time when the brahmin used to display they are the holy men.

Here is an example, Babbu Maan in one interview said I used to do drugs when I was in my teens and everyone does them then, at that age. Then in a different interview he says I never did them at all, take a sample of my blood.

These singers surely have become those holy men. They denounce anything in Sikhi which does not make sense to them and for their shows come out with a dastar for one show and then off for the next. These tracks barely do anything for the Sikhs that just wear a kara. These Sikhs need the kathavachiks and granthis and gyanis to explain the deeper meaning of Sikhi. I have heard on many occasions that Sant Maskeen Singh ji's Katha has been the main source why many people have dropped their monkey dancing ways and taken up Sikhi PERMANENTLY.

Freedom is only good as it's people. And the state of Punjab does not have to be repeated here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And on the other hand you have many keshdhari/amritdhari Sikhs who are the biggest pakhandi's ever and only use Sikhi as opportunist use anything for gain. Atleast mone don't go around pretending, we are what we are at face value. My love for Sikhi is such that I can't commit myself fully because I know inside I still have issues to deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use