Jump to content

Visakhi Dinner And Dance - Does Not Look Right


lotaya
 Share

Recommended Posts

What harvest? LOL How many of the people probably who are going to attend that function have done any farming in their life...its jsut an accuse to get <Edited> and eye up some kuriya...

That was probably what Vasaikhi was like prior to 1699? I'm messing (partially).

You know how people get with their caste identity, it doesn't matter if they can't farm to save their mother's life.

I remember years ago, when apnay (and Muslims too) would hold massive 'Vasaikhi gigs' complete with lingerie clad dancing girls in top night clubs in the UK. These events were big money makers for everyone who organised them, including the club who sold truck loads of booze to alcohol hungry Panjabis (who know what our lot can be like!)

I hope things have improved a bit since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may be celebrating the peasant harvest festival as opposed to the Khalsa formation?

I know your a staunch anti jatt,but the word peasant is offensive - in the eyes of the Bhaman your all peasants myself included ,without the harvest Panjab would have no food ,the event is not even organised by those who you call peasants ,my local ramgharia gurdwara is having a similar one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know basakhi has always been the most important and joyful time of the year for the farmers and farm workers in punjab.....long before Sikhi......For Muslim, Hindu and Sikhs. Important and joyful for wider society also because it mean't food on everyone's table for the coming year. Lets not forget also, that bhangra itself has its foundation on this day......As it was on basakhi that gangs of mirasis and baazigars would visit rural punjab and perform songs and dances for the joyful farmers. Now....of course the Sikhi aspect is the most important aspect for us now but you really can't go around calling Sikhs from rural backgrounds 'peasants' and accusing them of having no connection with the rural land back home. The fact of the matter is, for most of the sikhs of a jatt background in the UK, despite being born in the UK, the rural land their family own back in Punjab is quite probably the most valuable thing they own....Far more expensive than their homes in the UK, with rural farmland in the Jalandhar district of Punjab being THE most expensive on earth......at least 9 or 11 times more expensive than the UK, which itself is considered expensive in world terms.

I sometimes get the feeling that Sikhs that come from urban backgrounds in Punjab have this misguided notion of 'poor peasants' whenever they think of rural Punjab...and thus understand neither the true value nor the deep attachment that the rural sikhs have to their land. They've been celebrating basakhi for thousands of years. It really won't do to call them 'peasants' now for doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think dalsingh is just using a term which a few academics have used to describe people who worked the land , i.e farmers. I dont think it has been used in a derogatory or sinister way. Many have used the term peasents in connection with many great sikh acheivements especailly in warfare, how the peasents used agricultural tools as weapons to fight and win. As in medieval times there was generally feudal system so terms like peasent were used that dont mean they were like peasent literally meaning really poor as many where much worse off, terms such as scavangers have also been used by academics/historians on sikhi and punjab to describe certain people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well then would Dal Singh also refer to the Duke of Cornwall as a 'peasant'....for he is the owner of agricultural land which is cultivated by farm hands from what society sees as the 'lower classes' ? Is the Marquis of Bath also a peasant ?

Explain to me then how the zamindars...or landowners of some of the most expensive land in the world can be classed as 'peasants', especially as you use the 'medieval' interpretation as justification when it is in fact the medieval interpretation that would draw the clearer distinction between the farm labourers and the actual landowners they worked for.

You can't. You can't because dal singh has shown time and again here how the things he says are motivated by blind ignorance of and prejudice of...rural jatt sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
    • Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi Kalan uses simple Punjabi.
    • Leaving aside Guru ji, the general question of taking afeem (opium) in limited quantities for war/medical wounds is simply unproblematic. When you go to the hospital, they give you morphine. What do you think morphine is? It's an opiate. Even codeine (cough syrup) is an opiate! Ever had a cough? Granted, it is against Gurmat to take opium or other drugs for the fun of it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use