Jump to content

Why Did The Cycle Of Birth And Death Begain?


Recommended Posts

Sanjat Ji

I was thinking how did the cycle of birth and death or 84 lakh joons start. I mean what started the cycle was it kind of like what the bible says that Adam and Eve sinned thats what how sin came into the world. Was it like the Bible when someone did something wrong and God started the cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh ji

That is a very important question. I believe that earlier souls were freely flowing in the Universe. Possibly not staying at one place for long. But in some ancient mix of water, chemicals and energy flow, first basic microorganisms were formed. And souls of that time found some sort of resting place in the barely there definitions of first life forms. And they became attached. They were attached to the bodies, to the life forms. When the life forms evolved and began dividing (cell mitosis). It caused souls to split yet stick with new life forms. Over years, souls kept on sticking to their life forms, yet they evolved. And souls forgot Waheguru. And this is the best story I could cook up for now :| but the important part is, to know where you have to go. Where you have to be. With Waheguru. Have His Darshan. Guru's Darshan. And then there is no birth and life, friends or foes. Just Guru. Waheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalsa Ji

The cycle of rebirth will continue until such time that one loses their Vashna (desires). It is our desires and Haumeh (ignorance) that keeps bringing one back to Maat Lok (This world).

1. But why did the cycle of birth and death start, was it that the early humans God created did something wrong and God started the cycle for humans to find there way back to Him.

2. When the first humans were created they probably were saints because none of the bad ideas or anything bad could have distracrted them from remembering God.

3.So when the early humans died they were like saints so why would they go into the cycle of birth and death.

4. The story of Adam and Eve does make sense out of this, but what is the Gurmat and Gurbani say about it.

Someone has to ask a Giani or a Real Saint because this is driving me crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly we should remember that all this is the Khade of Akaal Purkh, everything is in His Hukam. Punn, dhaan, paap are all according to His will. He set the whole thing in motion.

There is a shabad by Guru Nanak Dev Ji that says that when there was nothing there wa Akaap Purkh and He sat in deep contemplation for eons and eons, then when He willed it everything was created and the whole evolution thing was set in motion into His manifest universe.

Actually some of the stories in the bible are true, including the existance of Baba Adam and Bibi Eve. But according to gurmat it is all under His hukam. In SatYuga life expectancy was very long, people lived for thousands of years and there was no paap a tremendous amount of tap had to be done to reach nirvana, all the souls lived in harmony be they devtay, animals, fish, birds or plants. But as the yug changed to Tretra then the life expectancy halved and paap came into existance and discord appeared amongst souls. Reincarnation was already in play but due to increase in paap the soul was now further and further away from nirvana.In Dwapra Yug, as can be see in Mahabharat, deceit, lies, jeleasouy, ego increased many times and so paap increased accordingly.

In KalYuga, well what can we say!

The only good thing here is that Akaal came in the form of Guru Nanak Dev Ji and his 10 jyotes to show us the way and of all the yugas we have to do the least amount of simran to gain mukhti.

Things are going to get worst and worst, even amongst the Khalsa you will see lakhs of Khalsa in bana and outwardly appearence but very very few - virla, virla - will be actual true khalsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things are going to get worst and worst, even amongst the Khalsa you will see lakhs of Khalsa in bana and outwardly appearence but very very few - virla, virla - will be actual true khalsa.

That's actually quite worrying to read. I guess all we can do is focus on ourselves and let Waheguru deal with the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਬੈਰ ਬਿਰੋਧ ਕਾਮ ਕ੍ਰੋਧ ਮੋਹ ॥ <br />बैर बिरोध काम क्रोध मोह ॥ <br />Bair biroḏẖ kām kroḏẖ moh. <br />Hate, conflict, sexual desire, anger, emotional attachment, <br /><br />ਝੂਠ ਬਿਕਾਰ ਮਹਾ ਲੋਭ ਧ੍ਰੋਹ ॥ <br />झूठ बिकार महा लोभ ध्रोह ॥ <br />Jẖūṯẖ bikār mahā lobẖ ḏẖaroh. <br />falsehood, corruption, immense greed and deceit: <br /><br />ਇਆਹੂ ਜੁਗਤਿ ਬਿਹਾਨੇ ਕਈ ਜਨਮ ॥ <br />इआहू जुगति बिहाने कई जनम ॥ <br />I▫āhū jugaṯ bihāne ka▫ī janam. <br />So many lifetimes are wasted in these ways. <br /><br />ਨਾਨਕ ਰਾਖਿ ਲੇਹੁ ਆਪਨ ਕਰਿ ਕਰਮ ॥੭॥ <br />नानक राखि लेहु आपन करि करम ॥७॥ <br />Nānak rākẖ leho āpan kar karam. ||7|| <br />Nanak: uplift them, and redeem them, O Lord - show Your Mercy! ||7|| <br /><br /><br />Khalsa Ji , the above are the causes of involuntary rebirths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use