Panj Granthi?

[GPS]

Naam simran is understanding the teaching of Guru , not a repetition of some words or banis.

You need to learn basics of sikhism before you criticize its concepts.

Read sikh rehat maryada. Naam simran is certainly repetition of Gurmantra.

ਜੈਸੇ ਜਲ ਮਹਿ ਕਮਲੁ ਨਿਰਾਲਮੁ ਮੁਰਗਾਈ ਨੈ ਸਾਣੇ ॥

ਸੁਰਤਿ ਸਬਦਿ ਭਵ ਸਾਗਰੁ ਤਰੀਐ ਨਾਨਕ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਖਾਣੇ ॥

ਰਹਹਿ ਇਕਾਂਤਿ ਏਕੋ ਮਨਿ ਵਸਿਆ ਆਸਾ ਮਾਹਿ ਨਿਰਾਸੋ ॥

ਅਗਮੁ ਅਗੋਚਰੁ ਦੇਖਿ ਦਿਖਾਏ ਨਾਨਕੁ ਤਾ ਕਾ ਦਾਸੋ ॥੫॥

ang 938

[Only five]

Naam simran is understanding the teaching of Guru , not a repetition of some words or banis.

as you wrote"completion of panj granthi equal to doing 101 japji sahib da jaap" what is meaning of doing 101 japji if you don't understand the message or concept of Guru.

Concept is to give bani a place in your heart not on toung.

As water has to pass through neck to finish thrust , bani has to go deep into soul by understanding the meaning.other wise as per ASA Ki War >> parh parh gadeh ladhian ............... will be and is true.

This is what Maharaj says in Sri Anand Sahib da paat:

sdw isPiq slwh qyrI nwmu min vswvey ] (917-7, rwmklI, mÚ 3)

sadaa sifat salaah tayree naam man vasaava-ay.

Constantly singing Your Praises and Glories, Your Name is enshrined in the mind. ang sung 917

So there is a point on doing 101 Sri Japji Sahib da paat

[SunSingh]

Ravinderkonkon - Different Bani's have different rewards - when Satguru Sri Guru Arjan Dev Ji were composing Gurbani at Amritsar Darbar Sahib, they had reached Basant Ki //. The Langari approached Guru Sahib and said that langar is ready please partake first and then the sangat will eat after you. Guru Sahib Ji said that it is disrespect to leave food ready to be eaten so i shall conclude Basant Ki // at this point where only a couple of pauris had been written. Bhai Gurdas Ji said to Guru Ji that this bani is very short and then Guru Arjan Dev Ji said don't worry whoever is to redite this bani will receive the merit of doing 1 jaap of Sukhmani Sahib.

panj granthi being equal to 101 Jap Ji Sahib was what i heard in a Giani Takhur Singh Katha but i can't remember which mp3 it was.

where did you hear this about Basant ki //

[ravinderkhunkhun]

where did you hear this about Basant ki //

I think Thakur Singh did not have any proof about this story and some times he is adding manmat in sikhism , eg in one of his lacture he said " some one saw 10 feet saheed singh " where is justification?

All guru sahibs were against "kautaks" , he is showing singhs doing kautaks as hindu gods. This is not gurmat , go and watch some video clips at"######"

This is what Maharaj says in Sri Anand Sahib da paat:

sdw isPiq slwh qyrI nwmu min vswvey ] (917-7, rwmklI, mÚ 3)

sadaa sifat salaah tayree naam man vasaava-ay.

Constantly singing Your Praises and Glories, Your Name is enshrined in the mind. ang sung 917

So there is a point on doing 101 Sri Japji Sahib da paat

This is from "anand sahib' and guru taking about NAAM , his (god) naam

[Only five]

This is from "anand sahib' and guru taking about NAAM , his (god) naam

Yes it is from Sri Anand Sahib da paat and yes Satguru is speaking about Sri Waheguru ji's naam. But you forgot to speak about the first half of the tuk. Satguru is telling us how to enshrine the naam in the mind. The technique Satguru says is to constantly singh his praises and glories. You said what is the point of doing 101 Sri Japji Sahib da paat and this tuk from Sri Anand Sahib da paat gives you the answer. This tuk supports the technique of constantly singing Sri Japji Sahib da paat or any other paat or shabad and then the naam will be enshrined in the mind.

Why did you put Anand Sahib in quotations?

[PAL 07]

I think Thakur Singh did not have any proof about this story and some times he is adding manmat in sikhism , eg in one of his lacture he said " some one saw 10 feet saheed singh " where is justification?

All guru sahibs were against "kautaks" , he is showing singhs doing kautaks as hindu gods. This is not gurmat , go and watch some video clips at"######"

the sakhi of basant ki // is taken from sooraj prakash and other historical granths, and shaheed singh's being 10ft tall is something i have read and heard of many times - so i dont think any of these are manmat.

RavinderKon i can see that you joined this forum last month, you seem to be of another new batch of people who use this forum to just confuse and dilute the traditional teachings of our great religion, please may SS be wary of this person