Jump to content

Origins Of Waheguru Mantar


Recommended Posts

Mokham Singh Jee,

In your post # 42, almost all the sentences you have quoted from an article (blog-Waheguru Gurmantar) are not from the true Gurus and Sri Guru Granth Saahib Jee. It is a deceitful practice to mix true Guru's Vaaks with false statements from other writers, in my view.

May I ask if you belong to a different religion? The followers of that religion are seeking truth somewhere else.

Balbir Singh

Khalsa Ji

Do you consider your "view" to be superior to SriGuruGobindSingh Ji's "view"?

Upon meditating upon Waheguru one is filled with the Anand of Naam Rass , how can a false religion evoke such Naam Rass?

Khalsa Ji there are numerous Sikh sahit references that state Waheguru to the Gurmantar , why do you reject this fact?

Khalsa Ji all the names attributed to the creator in Gurbani are directives for us to engage in simran of Gurmantar , i.e. Waheguru. For example :ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕਾ ਸਿਮਰਨੁ ਸਭ ਤੇ ਊਚਾ ॥

Prabh Kaa Simaran Sabh Thae Oochaa ||

प्रभ का सिमरनु सभ ते ऊचा ॥

The remembrance of God is the highest and most exalted of all.

1 ਗਉੜੀ ਸੁਖਮਨੀ (ਮ: ੫) ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੨੬੩ ਪੰ. ੧

Raag Gauri Sukhmanee Guru Arjan Dev

"Japp Mann sada Satnaam....."

Khalsa Ji Gurbani is directing us to Gurmantar when the different names of the creator are mentioned...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal,

Dear Mokham Singh Jee,

You wrote "Do you consider your 'view' to be superior to SriGuruGobindSingh Ji's 'view'?

These are your mind and your views, not mine.

Quote "Upon meditating upon Waheguru one is filled with the Anand of Naam Rass . . ."

True Gurus never suggested anyone to meditate upon Waheguru. You may have hypnotized your mind that way.

Quote " . . . how can a false religion evoke such Naam Rass?"

But they are trying their best and promising results.

Quote "Khalsa Ji there are numerous Sikh sahit references that state Waheguru to the Gurmantar , why do you reject this fact?"

The literature is sick that state something else and opposite to the true Gurus.

Did the true Gurus once suggest to do Jap of the word Waheguru calling as Gurmantar?

Please provide one reference and oblige. Please do not forget to mention the Ang of Sri Guru Granth Saahib Jee.

Please do not try to extend the topic if you cannot provide a reference.

Quote "Khalsa Ji all the names attributed to the creator in Gurbani are directives for us to engage in simran of Gurmantar , i.e. Waheguru."

It is shame to you and those preachers who dare to change or replace any name attributed to the creator by the true Gurus.

Quote "Khalsa Ji Gurbani is directing us to Gurmantar when the different names of the creator are mentioned..........."

Each name of the creator is conveying the super message of the Supreme through true Gurus.

Sorry for the mind of those that deviates them from truth.

*****

All the jooniaa preachers are drowning. I pray and hope God frees the true seekers from their company and save them.

*****

Please listen. Gurdev is singing in ecstasy.

ਮਨ ਮਹਿ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮਾ ਜਾਪਿ ॥

मन महि राम नामा जापि ॥

man mahi raam naamaa jaapi. SGGS Ang 405-18

*****

Balbir Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mokham Singh ji, there is no use in debating with this Balbir guy. He will confuse you and just use up your positive energy. He has been doing this for quite a few years on different forums. I don't know why sikh sangat admins are giving him this platform to give his twisted views. According to him, all the sant mahapurakhs, brahmgianis were just fake who did jaap of Waheguru Gurmantar.

Admin ji, if he is successful in creating dubidha in just one young impressionable mind, i think that is big loss for us.

Satnam shri Waheguru ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one side Bhai Gurdaas Jee , Baba Nand Singh Jee maharaj, Bhai Sahib Bhai Randheer Singh Jee who never had doubt on waheguru as a GuruMantar .

On other side is Balbir Singh

Useless to say who I or anyone will believe in ..... Not even worth discussing regardless of how many proof you give by manipulating Gurbani Sahib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mokham Singh ji, there is no use in debating with this Balbir guy. He will confuse you and just use up your positive energy. He has been doing this for quite a few years on different forums. I don't know why sikh sangat admins are giving him this platform to give his twisted views. According to him, all the sant mahapurakhs, brahmgianis were just fake who did jaap of Waheguru Gurmantar.

Admin ji, if he is successful in creating dubidha in just one young impressionable mind, i think that is big loss for us.

Satnam shri Waheguru ji

Right you are! Thread closed :)

In the future, we would encourage members to use the report feature when they feel things are getting out of hand. Dhanwaad :happy2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use