Jump to content

Pakistan Helping Khalistan Movement


Guest SaintSoldier
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not really thats what the Indian View is for Pakistan helping us with Khalistan. They don't need us they can get Kashmir themselves and they treat apni people in Pakistan with respect unlike India. They also told us during the Indian Independence thing not to go with India and that EDITED would stab us in the back but we didn't listen and now look at us. :T:

MOD: DO NOT GO ON ANY RELIGION, IT WAS REGIME WHO DID NOT A SPECIFIC RELIGION.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats not the 'indian view' its the truth, think to yourself wot does pakistan gain by helping us, why would they help us if they want nothing in return.

They also told us during the Indian Independence thing not to go with India and that EDITED would stab us in the back but we didn't listen and now look at us

yes but we were promised many things by gandhi n nehru, but who would u have trusted, gandhi who as many ppl thought 'got india independant' or jinnah who wanted to divide the country, who took half of punjab away from india and many historical places

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats not the 'indian view' its the truth, think to yourself wot does pakistan gain by helping us, why would they help us if they want nothing in return.
It is the Indian View if you don't believe me go watch Hawiyen at the end part when they kill the evil pakistani general who was going to trick us into making Khalistan into Kashmir
yes but we were promised many things by gandhi n nehru, but who would u have trusted, gandhi who as many ppl thought 'got india independant' or jinnah who wanted to divide the country, who took half of punjab away from india and many historical places

Pakistan didn't say to us after Independence to make Khalistan into Kashmir or to give them something in return when they said that Hindus might stab us in the back. We were not going to lose anything with siding with Pakistan and it wasn't just Pakistan it was also the British who asked us if we wanted Khalistan in 1947 if it was me i would rather have had Khalistan even if Hindus were our best friends.

As for the MOD on the forum most people that killed Sikhs during the riots were edited not the regime. Yes the regime might have said do th

is and that but there were groups of people that were going around killing people too and most people on this message board talk about other religions doing this and that why you changing my message? I am not bad mouthing any religion but you can't change the truth.

mod: during riots many sikh names also came so that doesnt means sikh killed sikh it was regimes game not sikhs or hindus, this is first waring to u STOP POINTING ON ANY RELIGION THINK BEFORE WHAT U WRITE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pakistan can stick it where the sun dont shine cos as far as I am concerned Pakistan has no interests in seeing a Khalistan established as we would want the whole of Punjab to be part of it so the they would lose out too if Khalistan was made.

The pakistani's real long term aim is to grab Kashmir for itself or make it independant as long as it is a muslim country.

Our strategy, as Sikhs worldwide, at the moment must be to wait and see approach. Pakistan is not very stable itself and if a civil war was to brake out it then it would provide the right time to for freedom fighters to liberate punjab from Islamic hold on punjab.

But the biggest hurdle is international politics, until the situation changes and this mences of al-qaeda and taliban are not defeated. The USA administration will continue to lend support to Pakistan even though it does so with gritted teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well in World Affairs, the only way you can get any support is when there is an interest for other parties to somehow benefit mutually from your cause. The current situation in this world blantantly shows us this example.

And it is well known that India and Pakistan are not best of friends, so whatever way these two major players direct their efforts to undermine eachother's rule...Sikhs can stand to benefit...on the one hand Punjab is under Islamic Rule on the other under Brahmanic Rule...none of which serve interests of Sikhs.

And to try to get caught up with the regular politics of vilifying Pakistan is to serve the interest of the Brahmins...and no matter which side you turn to you will have to be on one side of the fence or the other.

So all this non sense of the ISI suspectedly supporting some militants is evil....is purely there to serve the interests of individuals who would rather keep Sikhs under their thumbs.....What about the Indian Govt;s role in the 1985 Air INdia Bombings that was addressed by the book SOFT TARGET... wasnt that evil???

We must look at both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pakistan can stick it where the sun dont shine cos as far as I am concerned Pakistan has no interests in seeing a Khalistan established as we would want the whole of Punjab to be part of it so the they would lose out too if Khalistan was made.

The pakistani's real long term aim is to grab Kashmir for itself or make it independant as long as it is a muslim country.

Our strategy, as Sikhs worldwide, at the moment must be to wait and see approach. Pakistan is not very stable itself and if a civil war was to brake out it then it would provide the right time to for freedom fighters to liberate punjab from Islamic hold on punjab.

But the biggest hurdle is international politics, until the situation changes and this mences of al-qaeda and taliban are not defeated. The USA administration will continue to lend support to Pakistan even though it does so with gritted teeth.

Pakistan does see interest in seeing Khalistan being established. They wanted us to have Khalistan in 1947 they would have lost land and so would have India and what would they have got from that? Punjab might be under Islamic rule but our people are better off there without Indian rule. Most Sikhs living in pakistan are happy there you can look at pictures or you can ask someone or go there yourself and see. As for Pakistan wanting Kashmir all to themselves is not correct Kashmir wants to be either independent or with Pakistan but no

t with India. :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use