Jump to content

Absolutley Disgusting


RebelSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

bro jus for the record, i dont hate HOMO's,but its jus that i dont agree with their actions and beliefs regarding their sexuality

Why does it matter what you think of them ? Your beliefs are limited to you only .. not everyone will agree with your beliefs about their beliefs .

I know as a matter of fact that what I feel so deeply connected to ! I have many friends who are girls . I laugh with them and joke with them . But thats where it ends . People wonder if I have a girlfriend in my life . For the purpose of fooling this jagg , I do joking with the girls ..

There is one : a physical attraction and another , a sexual attraction . Both are not the same always .

For instance , as a man when you see another man who is well groomed on a marriage reception ( I was just at one a few hours back :biggrin2: ) , you compliment him and praise his looks . When a heterosexual women sees the same man , she just not only praise his looks but yearns him .

* removed *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sri Akal Takht Sahib issued a notice recently that same sex mariage cannot be performed by Anand Karaj, so i doubt very much they have got married in a gurdwara.

my friend thats all gud n well, BUT as sikhs we ARE NOT allowed 2 marry non-believers, YET, here in the uk/us/canada/panjab u c so many apnay marrying non-belivers, in the presence of our gurus, wen they have forbidden it. Wat im tryna say bro is, gyanis these days will do anything for a big payday, so i wudnt b suprised if they gave a financial backhander 2 a giani, 2 quietly look the other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can do what they want as long as the Sikh faith is not disparaged.

As much as some of us don't like it, homosexuals are humans beings and from time to time they also wish to experience the 'mazaa' of life as well. Doesn't mean we have to embrace them with open arms but as sensible, tolerant individuals we should just live and let live.

Everyone experiences it bro !

I have noticed whenever topic of gayism is popped up by some member , everyone goes like "we need to move beyond kaam " , whether be it between opposite sex or same sex.

All these are play of words used by same people who themselves are

They can do what they want as long as the Sikh faith is not disparaged.

As much as some of us don't like it, homosexuals are humans beings and from time to time they also wish to experience the 'mazaa' of life as well. Doesn't mean we have to embrace them with open arms but as sensible, tolerant individuals we should just live and let live.

They can do what they want as long as the Sikh faith is not disparaged.

As much as some of us don't like it, homosexuals are humans beings and from time to time they also wish to experience the 'mazaa' of life as well. Doesn't mean we have to embrace them with open arms but as sensible, tolerant individuals we should just live and let live.

Its true that many homosexual relationships don't tend to be life long , atleast from what I seen though I 've also seen many committed ones also , the ones being 'Chris Hughes' co-founder of facebook .

This makes one wonder homosexuals are sex-freaks and not interested in long-term commitment in relationship . What is the reasson ?

1) homosexuals , by virtue of their sexuality , are unable to form life-long commited relationship

OR

2) The four institutions of

FAMILY

RELIGION

SOCIETY

GOVT.

don't recognise the validity or enjoin sanctity on homosexual relations , thereby making even homosexuals feel that they are lesser beings and their relations are lesser of worth .

Only if we actually expected gay people to have life long relations , I am sure many would have been in monogamous or commited relations .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some comments here are disgusting. So much for view all of humanity as one.

No one here hates homosexuals or thinks they are bad but some things just aren’t acceptable in sikhi. Of course in kalyug you would think homosexuality is normal because it is widely acceptable by everyone just because they are in Love. But would you accept bestiality or incest as morally right just because they are in “love”. You have to draw the line and no, homosexuality isn’t right in sikhi because man and woman are meant to be together. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out. Sikhs are supposed to have a gristhi jeevan and that involves procreating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some comments here are disgusting. So much for view all of humanity as one.

Now you know how the other side feels when they hear you crying and whining over what is consider as seeing humanity as one in Sikhi. Educate yourself on Sikhi before you start being the village lady slaping your legs and chest and scaring the village children with your drama. :biggrin2: :nono:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one here hates homosexuals or thinks they are bad but some things just aren’t acceptable in sikhi. Of course in kalyug you would think homosexuality is normal because it is widely acceptable by everyone just because they are in Love. But would you accept bestiality or incest as morally right just because they are in “love”. You have to draw the line and no, homosexuality isn’t right in sikhi because man and woman are meant to be together. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out. Sikhs are supposed to have a gristhi jeevan and that involves procreating.

Trust me , we could give procreating a little rest here , without being gay and that would be for our betterment .

World population is growing so much . you just need to hit the streets to see it ... people everywhere around u .

This is going to create a lot of problems in future like unemployment , fossil fuels depletion , poverty , hunger , etc etc...

Give reproduction a little rest . "breeders" :biggrin2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Been so much nindya and attacking Shastarvidiya since the 2000s, however if we look at gatka now it's still mostly as poor and poorly taught as it was back then, still morris dancing moves and still behzti moves in BBC shows about sikhi and vaisakhi. If people were going to attack shastarvidiya, wouldn't have made sense to improve gatka instead and make it more effective? Additionally, the Nihang Singh presence has improved greatly now, and the cracks within the the SGPC and affiliated jatha jathebandis are showing more greatly as panth becomes more knowledgable with dasam bani and itihas day-by-day, so much gyaan which was lost within panjabi sikhs during colonial times. In the 2000s, the groups were able to talk down this bani and  gyaan by associating it with  RSS and hindus, brahminwaad etc. Not working so well now is it? However with gyaan it would be also good for us to try and preserve our martial arts and keertan vidiya as well! More and more crazy keertan videos are coming out from jatha members that are being made fun of and making sangat annoyed and upset, on tiktok and instagram reels.  
    • Author Posted April 24   On 4/21/2025 at 2:43 PM, ipledgeblue said: sirr should not be nanga because keski is usually worn.   Sikhs can sleep nanga-sirr if they choose to . Being from Punjab, almost every Sardaarji i know (amritdhari or not) sleeps/showers with their hair uncovered. I don't think Guru Sahib asked us to wear Dastar to sleep and I don't think it is in SRM.   The idea of "keski being worn to sleep" is cos in Bollywood films (Bachna Ae Haseeno) Sikh characters usually tie a gol parna when sleeping since the actor's usually Hindu. So they gotta cover his head somehow or he'd have cut hair. Same reason Diljit wore a pagg to bed in the El Sueno vid. Only time they didn't do that was in Gadar with Sunny Deol which just looked odd tbh   What in the world? What sikh or even a decent human would base their knowledge of their culture or religion on a movie industry, that too Bollywood?  Believe me, no sikh ever said, I must cover my head becasue an actor did so in a movie. I've been doing it all wrong, I must start covering mh head because the sikh in that movie did.  Just because every panjabi and sardaar you know, does something, also doesn't make it right..  Follow the guru. And if you have a medical condition, then exemptions can be made.  Just admit it, because of my medical condition, I am not able to follow this rehit. Why are you getting everyone else to drop to your level?
    • Wasn't Guru Arjan Dev's martyrdom on amd always commemorated on 6th June? How come it was 30th May?  Just like 6th June 84, where the likes of Terrorists like Indira Gandhi chose to attack Darbar Sahib where many many innocent Sikhs would suffer, as they went to commemorate Martyrdom of Maharaj. 
    • best thing is to follow the Sikh Rehat Maryada and use common sense for gray areas. Anything outside of that's irrelevant tbh that code is what Guru Gobind Singh Ji and the 5 Pyaare agreed on when creating Amrit in 1699
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use