Jump to content

Manmohan Singh France Turban issue


khalsa mero roop
 Share

Will India's first sikh prime minister solve the issue of the Frech Tuban ban  

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Will India's first sikh prime minister solve the issue of the Frech Tuban ban

    • Yes
      4
    • No
      17
    • Not Sure
      16


Recommended Posts

He is too diplomatic...I don't think he cares for Sikhs that much...

He is an economist and they r keepin him on that position because hez a chamcha of Sonia Gandhi...

His daughter is also married to a Hindu

I agree with you.. He is not the person who can be called as a "true Sikh" but at least he preserved his Identity unlike millions of our brothers don't even care about our crown.

He may not be the true sikh just like me or you but he might be the good human :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haan PaaG,

Agree with you! He seems a gud person ..

but if he is using Sikh tag to be on that position than he must do something for Sikhs and humans at large with full authority ...

He seems too weak Sikh...I'm really not one of his fans...

I even have heard that he represented India during 84 at UN and said that there is nothing wrong goin on with Sikhs...

:lol: Well I have very less reasons to be on his side ...

He really has to stand up like a Sikh and improve the lives of millions ..

Sorry for any mistakes

DEG TEG FATEH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Straight up, that Mangat Singh Dhillon, who makes those wicked videos, etc. is waaaaaaaaaay better than this guy. :lol:

Who cares if he wears a dastaar, and has the identity of a sikh, there are hindus who do the same, but work as agents of the indian government, this guy is no different, its just a coverup to show the world how India didn't do anything bad in 1984.

Its so pathetic how we think its such a big deal when this guy's a PM, and has all these qualifications, when he can't do jack for SIkhs. Dhillon is atleast doing parchaar through what he can do, and what is in his power. I think he is way better than manmohan bandar. nonono.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my opinion is, manmohan singh is doing something. but not enough. he is to diplomatic, as mentioned in the previous posts. but he needs to act more militant (ish), by that, threatening to cripple the french economy by cutting off trade links with the two nations.

he made a speech in saying something did work out with the two nations, but do you see anything that worked out? one or the other is lying.

my opinion, try and make indians not buy french products as well as cutting trade links.

its a shame, that we see mainly him representing sikhi, what about the gyanis? SGPC? SAD? Dal Khalsa? Sarbat Khalsa? Where are they, if they said something as well, i would say they would do more effect.

bhol chukke muaff

das

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at the end of the day manmohan has chosen for years to be at the forefront of a party that made headway into ethnic cleansing of amritdhari sikhs. He has become chumcha-puppet-leader at the same time as the organisers of the delhi riots in 1984 where thousands of sikhs were massacred are made the MP elects of delhi

He has aligned himself with the likes of badal by promoting the use of world heritage site for Sri Darbar Sahib complex.

Any such mainstream politicians have had to prove time and time again that they would sell their soul

We should press on andfight France's ridiculous stance on the turban issue and need not rely on lip service-"singhs" for help. Manmohan should focus on trying to abolish article 25 of constitution otherwise we may not even be allowed to wear dastaars in india! :lol:

Better still you're more likely to get help off governments and political parties in countries that HAVE legislated for the wearing of the dastaar. Even winston churchill said how could we deny the very singhs the right to wear the turban when we didn't ask them to wear helmets to protect themselves from bullets in WW1 or 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use