Guest Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 But historical evidence is not a necessary part of a rehatnama. I said the information that goes against gurmat in rehatnamas cannot be trusted not that the whole rehatnama is invalid. My point is we must use our brains. I have nothing against rehatnamas only the parts where the information stated is against gurmat like the colour red being a bad colour.So what about gurbani?Do you Belive that?You do have a very valid point. This time I have to agree with you.This is the first time you agree with me?I thought you agreeded with me in the past.That makes me sad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehtab Singh Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 Here have a napkin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 Here have a napkinDo you have a towel?My tears are filling up a bucket. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehtab Singh Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 tenu baalti leya deyaan ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 tenu baalti leya deyaan ?Too late I cried a river. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gurdeep Posted January 2, 2014 Report Share Posted January 2, 2014 I have read this thread and to say that Sikhism is religion that was created at a time of moghul empire and it being a very ruthless empire, like many of the past. Even if you look at Buddhism that originated from India and now is the most practised religion in China, the Chinese people are no different to a Sikh, they were fortunate to get Buddha come into their region when Hindus rejected Buddhism in India. I agree with the original question the outside has no reflection of a good honest person, look at the politicians of Punjab, bearded uncut turban wearing Sikhs, faithful to their Gurus but not true to themselves, Sikhism or the people of Punjab. It is a matter of personal choice, Sikhism is open to all mankind and to embrace more, cut haired Sikhs should not feel any less closer to God than those that have not cut hair, God is with everyone, if you only believe and be honest life with no harm to planet, people, animals and nature. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerStyleZ Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 Its simple: Sikh doesnt means that you Khalsa. And we beleive in all Gurus from 1 - 11. The same light is in every Guru and Guru Gobind Singh ji created Khalsa - dont try to search for gaps in Gurbani. In Gurbani there aint Gaps. Only fools dont see what is written on their forehead... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cadet Harmeet Singh Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 For those who r giving different shabads from sri guru granth sahib ji... Do u remember the following lines: Kabir preet ik sio kiye aan dubida jaye. Bhanvein lambe kes kar bhave gharrar mudaey. This is also bani of sri guru granth sahib ji... I havent found anywhere that if i cut my hair... Den i m doing sumthing wrong... Yet i have kept my hair... Never ever tried to cut them... But always thinking about it... And i never found anywhere dat it is mendatory to keep hair... Nowhere it is writen... What i found is an order sayng " naam japo .. Wand shako... Te kirt kmai kro""" i think if we do this... Den our gurus will be lot more pleased... Than just keeping long hair nd pretending to be a sikh... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddasingh Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 You are insulting all Sikhs who gave their head rather than their faith. In 1984 Hindu government mobs did not celebrate taking wallets from Sikhs. They celebrated forcibly cutting Sikh hair. Those mobs have better knowledge of the faith and history to which some of you lay claim. ‘Nowhere it is writen’ that you can’t put a tire around yourself and set it on fire. Let us know if you will contemplate that also. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarinderSingh Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 For those who r giving different shabads from sri guru granth sahib ji... Do u remember the following lines: Kabir preet ik sio kiye aan dubida jaye. Bhanvein lambe kes kar bhave gharrar mudaey. This is also bani of sri guru granth sahib ji... I havent found anywhere that if i cut my hair... Den i m doing sumthing wrong... Yet i have kept my hair... Never ever tried to cut them... But always thinking about it... And i never found anywhere dat it is mendatory to keep hair... Nowhere it is writen... What i found is an order sayng " naam japo .. Wand shako... Te kirt kmai kro""" i think if we do this... Den our gurus will be lot more pleased... Than just keeping long hair nd pretending to be a sikh... Then on the same bases get ready for something mind blowing. All those women who dress half naked are not also wrong. Exposing there chest, other parts are right to do so in the same sense you present the above lines of Gurbani. Ang 324 Bhagat Kabir ji says kiaa naagae kiaa baadhhae chaam || What does it matter whether someone goes naked, or wears a deer skin, jab nehee cheenas aatham raam ||1|| rehaao || if he does not remember the Lord within his soul? ||1||Pause|| Is anyone ready to present this to their sister, wife, or mother to justify her scantly clad way of dressing? Give this to the teenager struggling with her identity. Gurbani is not here to justify wrong doings of cutting hair. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.