Jump to content

Farid Ganj Shakkar, or Farid al-Sani


chatanga
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gurbani of Bhagat Farid Ji in Aad Guru Granth Sahib is of Sheikh Braham Farid Saani. He was the 13th successor of Farid Ganj Shakar. Every successor adopted the name Farid. There is a lot of internal evidence in Gurbani to prove this such as grammar, use of similar Punjabi words and usage of words like Gur, Saadh, Prabh which are not used by Muslims or in Islam. Also authenticity plays a big role in it. Dr. Khaliq Ahmad Nizami in his Phd thesis has proved beyond the doubt that the Bani is of Farid Saani because Farid Ganj Shakar never composed any bani. This fact is accepted by descendants of Farid Ji (Farid Gharana). Read Bhagat Bani Itihaas by Giani Gurdit Singh. Guru Rakha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes im a little confused over it myself. but listening to Sant Gurbachan Singh, he is clear that it is Bhagat Farid Ganj Shakker, (the grandfather).

Bijla Singh bro, do you know who this title Ganj Shakkar was appropriated to ? the was it al-Sani or his predecessor?

Can you give us any links to dr nizams works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes im a little confused over it myself. but listening to Sant Gurbachan Singh, he is clear that it is Bhagat Farid Ganj Shakker, (the grandfather).

Bijla Singh bro, do you know who this title Ganj Shakkar was appropriated to ? the was it al-Sani or his predecessor?

Can you give us any links to dr nizams works?

I'm not well read or anything at all, but I've heard Ganj Shakkar was the title given to Bhagat Fareed Ji.

Can you elaborate how he got the title of Shakkar Ganj? I've heard a few variations of the story and don't know which one is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The book is called "The life and times of Shaikh Farid-u'd-din Ganj-i-Shakar". As is clear from the title, Farid of 12th century was called Ganj-i-Shakar. He was a fundamentalist and is considered father of Pakistan because he converted loads of people to Islam who later supported a separate Muslim state. His native tongue was Arabic and composed no bani. People later used his epithet in their own compositions but only his successors had the right to use it. A fundamental Muslim would praise Mohammad and would not use words like Saadh, Prabh and Gur in his compositions. This debate is more than 100 years old. Most Sikh scholars just like Sant Ji believe that Gurbani belongs to the first Farid. Sant Ji also believed in the traditional viewpoint that Bhagats were called from Sachkhand. I personally do not agree with these viewpoints because it opens a gateway to myriads of questions on the authenticity of Gurbani. I think Sikh scholars are not studying this topic seriously. Just like they are confused about Bhagat Jaidev (there have been two) and Bhagat Naamdev (there have been 3 or 4) they are also confused about Bhagat Farid Ji. Surinder Singh Kohli, Gurbachan Singh Talib, Balwant Singh Anand, Prof. Sahib Singh and Dr. Trilochan Singh have written in favor of first Farid. But I think Dr. Preetam Singh’s recent book is better than all of them yet still very weak. Nihal Singh Soori and Giani Gurdit Singh have written in favor of Farid Saani. The latter’s book, a well-researched one, is still in the market. Guru Rakha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bijla Singh, Have you read "The life and times of Shaikh Farid-u'd-din Ganj-i-Shakar" ? If yes, where did you get it from?

have been looking on the internet, it is not availabl in any shops, but it was written in 1955.

I'm not well read or anything at all, but I've heard Ganj Shakkar was the title given to Bhagat Fareed Ji.

Can you elaborate how he got the title of Shakkar Ganj? I've heard a few variations of the story and don't know which one is true.

there are several anecdotes about his name. His mom put stones in place of sugarlumps under his prayer mat, which turned to sugarlumps after he had said his prayers.

when i was learning Urdu, in one of the books it tells of Bhagat Farid Ganj Shakkar, saying that on his way to met his murshid, he fell over and mud went inot his mouth, which tasted just like sugar. His Murshid told him that as you have found God, everything is sweet to you, hence the name Ganj Shakkar.

The book is called "The life and times of Shaikh Farid-u'd-din Ganj-i-Shakar". As is clear from the title, Farid of 12th century was called Ganj-i-Shakar. He was a fundamentalist and is considered father of Pakistan because he converted loads of people to Islam who later supported a separate Muslim state. His native tongue was Arabic and composed no bani.

Bro, just think that these very people were the ones that bombed his mazaar very recently. Do you think they would have donme that if he were a fundamentalist type?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the book but since I did not buy it from a bookstore I cannot reveal the source. See if you can find the one published in 1973. I may be able to get my copy scanned and upload it in the future but it won’t be anytime soon. There are plenty of quotes provided in Bhagat Bani itihaas. If you require them I can type some for you. Farid Ji of 12th century was a sufi and at the time Sufis had not split into two factions. Later on, one faction advocated the policy of forced conversion and rose to prominence during Jahangir’s reign. This Nakashbandi order was the main culprit behind Guru Sahib’s martyrdom. The other faction (Mian Mir, Buddhu Shah) was more on the side of Gurmat. These days, Sunnis consider all Sufis as heretics so they are being targeted. But it doesn’t change the fact that Farid Ji converted a lot of people to Islam. When I say he was a fundamentalist, I mean in terms of following Islam in strict sense so he couldn’t have composed anything in Punjabi and used non-Muslim words. Guru Rakha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are plenty of quotes provided in Bhagat Bani itihaas. If you require them I can type some for you.

If you can, then it would be great, if you can provide some basic details about what parts of the Bhagat Bani steer you more towards al-Sani.

Have been looking on the net about Ganj Shakkar, and the general opinion is that he was born in present day afghanistan, wouldnt he have been more of a persian/dari speaker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use