Jump to content

Recommended Posts

According to him Guru Gobind Singh Ji came to him in disguise of a Sikh. Stayed the night at his place and left in the morning. They left a bag. When opened the bag contained sources regarding maharaj's life. He (Kavi Ji) had finished Nanak Prakash Granth and Suraj Prakash. He only needed confirmation on a few aspects of Guru Gobind Singh Ji's earthly sojourn. The material in the bag provided it.

I'm not sure that he would have been considered a great historian as well as a scholar if this was true. He would simply be someone who got lucky by finding such bag and that would help conclude his research !!

I don't think so and find it hard to believe because researchers do not go bywhat they find in a bag !!!!

Anyway, these accounts in PPP for Banda Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh ji..etc.etc... have been put together from many persian, mughal and sikh sources. I woudl assume that we are getting the majority of information in good faith and accuracy in his sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rattan Singh Bhangu author of prachin panth Prakash was the grandson of Bhai mehtab Singh who with Sukha Singh beheaded Massa Ranger. A lot is written by Bhangu & Kavi Ji about Akali Nihang Singh maryada that the wider panth most likely will not accept or agree with. It is important to accept that the Akali Nihangs are a distinct military order created to serve & protect Dharam & thier maryada is not the same as a civilian Sikhs because they carry out a different function.

In those days not every Singh became Shaheed. Some suffered injuries such as cut of arms or legs and unlike today did not have hospitals where they would be administered pain killers such as morphine etc. Opium & Sukha are natural products derived from nature & are excellent pain killers hence there use. From my knowledge the fauj use to carry with them haldi, salt, neem & sukha to help clean & heal wounds. Mahaprashad was initiated by Guru Hargobind Sahib at Akal Bunga when the Akal Sena was formed & thier warfare training started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rattan Singh Bhangu author of prachin panth Prakash was the grandson of Bhai mehtab Singh who with Sukha Singh beheaded Massa Ranger. A lot is written by Bhangu & Kavi Ji about Akali Nihang Singh maryada that the wider panth most likely will not accept or agree with. It is important to accept that the Akali Nihangs are a distinct military order created to serve & protect Dharam & thier maryada is not the same as a civilian Sikhs because they carry out a different function.

In those days not every Singh became Shaheed. Some suffered injuries such as cut of arms or legs and unlike today did not have hospitals where they would be administered pain killers such as morphine etc. Opium & Sukha are natural products derived from nature & are excellent pain killers hence there use. From my knowledge the fauj use to carry with them haldi, salt, neem & sukha to help clean & heal wounds. Mahaprashad was initiated by Guru Hargobind Sahib at Akal Bunga when the Akal Sena was formed & thier warfare training started.

Nihangs are not a distinct order.They are the same as the Khalsa and took khande di pahul amrit like every other Amritdhari.I love Nihangs from the bottom of My heart but they are no different than me or you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nihangs are not a distinct order.They are the same as the Khalsa and took khande di pahul amrit like every other Amritdhari.I love Nihangs from the bottom of My heart but they are no different than me or you.

"hum akali sub ke vali, humra panth 'niaraa' hai...." (Nihang Singh bola that forms part of 'salok dumalle da')

The 'panth' spoken of here is the Khalsa panth, read through history and you will see that the Akali Nihangs are the Khalsa panth, not what is considered 'Khalsa' today. Baba Nihal Singh has said this, baba Santa Singh also. Even Giani thakur Singh and baba hari Singh have said that the original Khalsa was the Akali Nihangs in thier katha. There's even a Sakhi of Dhan Dhan Baba Thakur Singh ji saying that the Akali Nihangs were the original Khalsa who we all come from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you sure your citation from PPP is correct....it seems like the parsang of Ghanni Khan and Nabhi Khan and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Jee enacting as an Uch Da Pir after machiwara......Here meat was offered by muslims as halaal meat and Sahib Sri Guru Gobind Singh jee turned it into Pancha Amrit Karah Parshad. At machiwarra Sri Guru Gobind Singh ji offered coins to a man to stop him from exposing the Guru to the evil regime. Guru Sahib eventually did chatka stroke with his shamsheer sword and killed him.

the sakhi in PPP states that the muslims gave Guru Ji and the SIkhs some meat to eat, but the Sikhs said the pir is keeping roza, but then the muslims said you eat. The Sikhs said to the Guru protect us, and Guru Ji replied do tegha of the food beofre you eat it. So the SIkhs did this and the muslims replied what ios this you are doing? The Sikhs said this is the latest trend to come from Mecca, and so the muslims asked no more.

That is the story of Macchiwara.

But for eye-witness historical account read Amarnamah written by Dhadi Nath Mal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the sakhi in PPP states that the muslims gave Guru Ji and the SIkhs some meat to eat, but the Sikhs said the pir is keeping roza, but then the muslims said you eat. The Sikhs said to the Guru protect us, and Guru Ji replied do tegha of the food beofre you eat it. So the SIkhs did this and the muslims replied what ios this you are doing? The Sikhs said this is the latest trend to come from Mecca, and so the muslims asked no more.

That is the story of Macchiwara.

But for eye-witness historical account read Amarnamah written by Dhadi Nath Mal.

If I'm not mistaken this is where Gurdwara 'kirpan bhet' is too mark that incident.

However, the story of mahraj eating Mahaprashad whilst staying at the house of a khattri is also recorded in PPP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use