Jump to content

Did Guru Gobind Singh Ji Give Someone the Death Penalty?


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This cult belief has no roots in Sikhi.  Gurbani does not demonstrate this cave man belief.  Surely this cult believer would go into Gurbani and take tuks out of context to support is cult beliefs.  But never a whole shabad because this would teach against his cult beliefs.  To even call this cave man thinking is an insult to the cave men, who used even the simplest form of logic they had among them.  They didn`t know better.  Today, Gurbani is seconds away and yet we have people making outrageous claims.  Zafarnama clearly tells the worst sinner he received no blessing in disguise.  History tells us this worst sinner in the world died after reading the letter titled Zafarnama, written by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji. Sri Hargobind Sahib ji punished Chandu Shah with death after masterminding the torture and killing of Sri Guru Arjun Dev ji.  Sikhs tortured and killed Chandu Shah at the HUKAM of Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib.  There was no blessing in disguise because the HUKAM and THE GURU are one and the SAME.  These cult followers don`t read Gurbani.  They make up fairy tales so they can rape, kill fetuses, and kill people for their own pleasure and say our cult leader blessed your loved one with mukti, while raping your wife.   

You are the only wicked and a liar cult here. You are so filled with poison, that you just keep on vomiting....ha ha ha ha a clown. 

The more you open your mouth every time, the more you show how ignorant you are. 

It is only fools like you, that take a part of Gurbani as incomplete, when the part by itself is sufficient.

Gurbani is Amrit, you do not need to drink the whole  to satisfy your thirst,  even a drop of it will full you up, except of course, an ahankaree and agyani fellow like you.... who is already full with the filth of lies, from head to toes

So of course a twisted and wicked mind as yours, can never ever grasp even a single verse of Gurbani, so what to say of a whole Shabad.

Stop fooling sangat here with your rubbish. Do not take them as stupids as yourself. They know what is right and wrong.

No one ever raises any word, and you like a mad dog, barks here every x time with you nonsense. I have already proved your total wrong interpretation of Gurbani in the recent past, have you forgotten? do you want me to provide it again here? How long will you keep lying and putting your manmukhta here?

You do not even know the real value of Guru Jee, and you are putting your wicked ideals at their level.

Foolish man, know that, whether cold water or hot water is poured on fire, the fire gets extinguished...

I think you have no solution.  You are the only fool out of context here.

You are like a dog´s tail, which is always curved, and not even by putting it into a tube it gets straightened, rather the tube gets curved... ha ha ha.

Stupid liar  ..... Now go and cry complaining to the moderator......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
18 minutes ago, harsharan000 said:

You are the only wicked and a liar cult here. You are so filled with poison, that you just keep on vomiting....ha ha ha ha a clown. 

The more you open your mouth every time, the more you show how ignorant you are. 

It is only fools like you, that take a part of Gurbani as incomplete, when the part by itself is sufficient.

Gurbani is Amrit, you do not need to drink the whole  to satisfy your thirst,  even a drop of it will full you up, except of course, an ahankaree and agyani fellow like you.... who is already full with the filth of lies, from head to toes

So of course a twisted and wicked mind as yours, can never ever grasp even a single verse of Gurbani, so what to say of a whole Shabad.

Stop fooling sangat here with your rubbish. Do not take them as stupids as yourself. They know what is right and wrong.

No one ever raises any word, and you like a mad dog, barks here every x time with you nonsense. I have already proved your total wrong interpretation of Gurbani in the recent past, have you forgotten? do you want me to provide it again here? How long will you keep lying and putting your manmukhta here?

You do not even know the real value of Guru Jee, and you are putting your wicked ideals at their level.

Foolish man, know that, whether cold water or hot water is poured on fire, the fire gets extinguished...

I think you have no solution.  You are the only fool out of context here.

You are like a dog´s tail, which is always curved, and not even by putting it into a tube it gets straightened, rather the tube gets curved... ha ha ha.

Stupid liar  ..... Now go and cry complaining to the moderator......

Vaheguru! *+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, harsharan000 said:

You are the only wicked and a liar cult here. You are so filled with poison, that you just keep on vomiting....ha ha ha ha a clown. 

The more you open your mouth every time, the more you show how ignorant you are. 

It is only fools like you, that take a part of Gurbani as incomplete, when the part by itself is sufficient.

Gurbani is Amrit, you do not need to drink the whole  to satisfy your thirst,  even a drop of it will full you up, except of course, an ahankaree and agyani fellow like you.... who is already full with the filth of lies, from head to toes

So of course a twisted and wicked mind as yours, can never ever grasp even a single verse of Gurbani, so what to say of a whole Shabad.

Stop fooling sangat here with your rubbish. Do not take them as stupids as yourself. They know what is right and wrong.

No one ever raises any word, and you like a mad dog, barks here every x time with you nonsense. I have already proved your total wrong interpretation of Gurbani in the recent past, have you forgotten? do you want me to provide it again here? How long will you keep lying and putting your manmukhta here?

You do not even know the real value of Guru Jee, and you are putting your wicked ideals at their level.

Foolish man, know that, whether cold water or hot water is poured on fire, the fire gets extinguished...

I think you have no solution.  You are the only fool out of context here.

You are like a dog´s tail, which is always curved, and not even by putting it into a tube it gets straightened, rather the tube gets curved... ha ha ha.

Stupid liar  ..... Now go and cry complaining to the moderator......

 

This is the behavior of cult followers.  Once they are exposed, they can't provide anything to back up their outrageous claims.  They try to slowly poison the Sikh sangat.  This poster thinks, I am bothered by his insults.  All I did in the past was start questioning and casted doubt on his post and he left this forum for a mental break.  You had a mental break down.  You know these post will take you into another mental break down.  When I wrote the post, I knew you would behave in this manner.  It was no surprise to me.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
12 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

You write das to address yourself.  Yet you are supporting a post that viciously attacks another person.  You have no humility. Das means servant of all in Sikhi context.  Even Trump does a better job of putting up a front.

There's hundreds of better stuff we can both do then insult each other on a forum acting like 3 year olds. So for the sake of saving time, just go on with what exactly you hate? Also since Vaheguru is everywhere that would mean he's inside Trump as well. But since Daas has better things to do, you can just get an internet warrior badge for being the person who's more interested in trolling than the actual Sikhi on this site. (If you spent the time on this site in equal amounts of your Bhagti, you'd probably reach a high state).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jacfsing2 said:

There's hundreds of better stuff we can both do then insult each other on a forum acting like 3 year olds. So for the sake of saving time, just go on with what exactly you hate? Also since Vaheguru is everywhere that would mean he's inside Trump as well. But since Daas has better things to do, you can just get an internet warrior badge for being the person who's more interested in trolling than the actual Sikhi on this site. (If you spent the time on this site in equal amounts of your Bhagti, you'd probably reach a high state).

This is your explanation why you put on a front for calling yourself das when you support a person who viciously attacks another person?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
7 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This is your explanation why you put on a front for calling yourself das when you support a person who viciously attacks another person?

Daas means servant which you are correct with; however, you clearly started the venomous attacks towards Harsharan. We can highly doubt you read anything anybody has said to, and your ears are probably shut to hearing anything. Daas doesn't even want to argue about a nonsensical issue, when one of us could be doing more Paht, or Simran, or whatnot. Not everyone has time to waste like you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jacfsing2 said:

Daas means servant which you are correct with; however, you clearly started the venomous attacks towards Harsharan. We can highly doubt you read anything anybody has said to, and your ears are probably shut to hearing anything. Daas doesn't even want to argue about a nonsensical issue, when one of us could be doing more Paht, or Simran, or whatnot. Not everyone has time to waste like you.

Das means servant all in Sikhi context.  People who are labelled das by the Sikh kaum have no hatred for anyone.  In your case, you liked a post that attacked me as a human being.  This clearly shows you are not a das.  How I started the post has no difference on a person who is considered das.  Servants of all, respect all and do not favor attacks.  You are not a das.  For the sake of all stop calling yourself das.  It's like calling a mona who wears a turban one day a sardar.  It's offensive, so stop doing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
5 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

Das means servant all in Sikhi context.  People who are labelled das by the Sikh kaum have no hatred for anyone.  In your case, you liked a post that attacked me as a human being.  This clearly shows you are not a das.  How I started the post has no difference on a person who is considered das.  Servants of all, respect all and do not favor attacks.  You are not a das.  For the sake of all stop calling yourself das.  It's like calling a mona who wears a turban one day a sardar.  It's offensive, so stop doing it. 

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! O.k., bye. (One of us doesn't want to argue on this topic forever, if you want to argue on it forever you can). Your free to believe in your missionary ideology if you want, just stop trolling the forums, (you have too much open time on your hands, and Daas does not). Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jacfsing2 said:

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! O.k., bye. (One of us doesn't want to argue on this topic forever, if you want to argue on it forever you can). Your free to believe in your missionary ideology if you want, just stop trolling the forums, (you have too much open time on your hands, and Daas does not). Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

I had no real interaction with you till you favored an attack against me today.  In the past others have asked you not to use das because you don't have the qualities to go by this highly respected title.  Today, once again you have shown, you don't have the traits to go by the title das.  This is not an argument.  I am asking you to stop calling yourself das.  I gave you prime examples of why you should not call yourself das.  But you still continue to call yourself das.  You can live in your bubble, but reality shows, you are no das. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use