Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Forget the marathas. No discussion about the Khalsa raj and coalitions is complete without mentioning the French. The Sikh raj had no closer freind than France. The French influence was strong and growing stronger by the day. Heck, even our greatest hero of recent times is named after a French army rank : Jarnail. The King of France, Louis Phillipe, in his letter sent from the place of Versailles to the Sikh raj said : "Although long distances and oceans part the kingdoms of the Panjab from that of France, this is no bar to the love that binds

our hearts together."

In the last days of Ranjit Singh plans were under way to bound the two nations together even closer. I have no doubt that if Ranjit Singh had not unexpectadly died France and the Khalsa Raj would have formed a coalition to invade British India to the south. Thats what France wanted and all indications show the Sikhs did too in the end.

Forget the marathas. No discussion about the Khalsa raj and coalitions is complete without mentioning the French. The Sikh raj had no closer freind than France. The French influence was strong and growing stronger by the day. Heck, even our greatest hero of recent times is named after a French army rank : Jarnail. The King of France, Louis Phillipe, in his letter sent from the place of Versailles to the Sikh raj said : "Although long distances and oceans part the kingdoms of the Panjab from that of France, this is no bar to the love that binds

our hearts together."

In the last days of Ranjit Singh plans were under way to bound the two nations together even closer. I have no doubt that if Ranjit Singh had not unexpectadly died France and the Khalsa Raj would have formed a coalition to invade British India to the south. Thats what France wanted and all indications show the Sikhs did too in the end.

I am not doubting you but are there any sources which depict this relationship?? There must be a whole anthology of Maharajah Ranjit Singh's letters lying somewhere. If found it can be revolutinary in changing perspectives and criticisms held on the Khalsa empire of the said century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also a letter the Maharajah addressed to Queen Victoria stating that the Khalsa is the rightful overlord of Punjab, as Akal-roop Guru Gobind Singh Ji granted it sovereignty over the said religion. Can this letter be accessed online??? It is only now we are infiltrating the inner corridors of the immensly psychological Lahore polity. Already I have addressed a few queries on this forum which remain unanswered. Maybe these letters can answer them??? Especially the role of Tarna Dal during this period. By the way is 'Jarnail' an indigenous corruption of the French term for general??? I investigated today and discovered that it is not a specific French term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget the marathas. No discussion about the Khalsa raj and coalitions is complete without mentioning the French. The Sikh raj had no closer freind than France. The French influence was strong and growing stronger by the day. Heck, even our greatest hero of recent times is named after a French army rank : Jarnail. The King of France, Louis Phillipe, in his letter sent from the place of Versailles to the Sikh raj said : "Although long distances and oceans part the kingdoms of the Panjab from that of France, this is no bar to the love that binds

our hearts together."

In the last days of Ranjit Singh plans were under way to bound the two nations together even closer. I have no doubt that if Ranjit Singh had not unexpectadly died France and the Khalsa Raj would have formed a coalition to invade British India to the south. Thats what France wanted and all indications show the Sikhs did too in the end.

The French were a good empire to forge relations with. They were a super power at the time rivaling the British. That is why Tipu Sultan in South India also tried to forge relations with the French. He realized the danger the British posed when no one else in India did. He tried his best to make an alliance with the French against the British, he even invited the Afghans to invade India in order to make an alliance with them against the British. The Brits realized the danger Tipu Sultan could pose, so they in turn convinced the Marathas and Nizam of Hyderabad to invade and destroy Tipu's power in Mysore. Once Tipu was finished, the British then finished off the Marathas and turned the Hyderabad state into a British protectorate. The British were way too crafty for anyone in the Sub continent to handle.

During Maharaja Ranjit Singh's time, the only other independent states other than Punjab were Sindh and Nepal. Maharaja should have come to some kind of understanding with these two states and formed a strategic defensive front against the British.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. By the way is 'Jarnail' an indigenous corruption of the French term for general??? I investigated today and discovered that it is not a specific French term.

Oh it is indeed 13mirch, and so is the common Sikh name of Karnail' (taken from the French for colonel).

Its actually extremely interesting from a linguistics and history of language point of view. You see the substuting of the 'l' for an 'r' and the subsequently shifting back to it again does a nice job of summarizing the history of old French to middle French to modern French. Indeed not just French, this phenonema was common to the main 3 romamce languages of French, Spanish and Italian.

Starting at the beginning then, old Italian carried on with the latin term of 'colonello' for the officer we know in English as colonel. The original latin tells us what that officer was and did as we recognise the word 'column'.....i.e he was a line commander. I don't know why but during the late 1500's, 1600's and 1700's the Spanish language experienced a shift of the letter 'l' in words and so colonell became 'coronel'. France followed suit and the word in French changed to 'coronaille' (pronounced Karnail) . During the 1600's the British started using the word for the first time and although they spelt it the old way i.e with the 'l' (colonel) it is noticable how the English pronounciation shows respect to the word in vogue among the French at that time i.e Kernal. Not long after, for modern French, the French actually go back to basics and shift back to colonelle. But, you can be sure that the French officers in the Khalsa army were using the 'r' in both general and colonel.....i.e generaille was pronounced 'Jarnail' and colonaille was prounounced 'Karnail'. Over the last 100 years 2 of the most common first names among Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No discussion about the Khalsa raj and coalitions is complete without mentioning the French.

Great point Legal Singh Veerji.

Of course Sardar Baghel Singh was an Amritdhari whose life you are obviously familar with + in whom 100% of the Panth has so much pride in, given that he had no other affiliation other than the Khalsa Panth + resolute faith in one God alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use