Jump to content

Tipton Bomb Attack


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

It seems some you won't be happy with a muslim until he stops breathing. Even when he stops breathing I get the impression you'll say he stopped breathing on purpose as part of some sinister plan.

Hahaha... that made me laugh. Some muslims are ok not all are bad. But they do seem to think 9/11 and 7/7 was an inside job, which is wrong on all the victims who were killed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goreh (mostly the working classes I guess) are getting really peed off with what they perceive as them being threatened and pushed around in their own country. I wouldn't be surprised if some extreme elements decided to fight back. Put it this way: If as Sikhs we were made to feel that way by a minority in a Sikh homeland, would our lot just sit by and twiddle their thumbs hoping this minority behave themselves? Of course, planting bombs and taking out innocent people is NEVER the right thing to do. Have street battles, tear-ups, etc., but don't start bombing places of worship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems some you won't be happy with a muslim until he stops breathing. Even when he stops breathing I get the impression you'll say he stopped breathing on purpose as part of some sinister plan.

Legal Singh Veerji i know you were saying this tongue in cheek but just in case some uninformed neutrals take your joke seriously, let's remind them that:

Despite 1984, Sikhs have never attacked Mandirs or any innocent Hindu's despite being a majority in Punjab.

In the area where Muslims did not attack Sikhs first (in 1947) ... Malerkotla ... that town still remains a Muslim majority town with not a single innocent Muslim hurt.

Whilst Hindu's and Muslims prayed In England during the English Riots the Sikhs protected them.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-14472484

Just because Sikhs oppose slavery+pedophilia like Prophet Muhammad's sex with a 9year old child called Aisha + his sale of innocent human beings into slavery and Muhammad ordering Muslims to freely rape slaves + other forms of Islamic Genocide against Sikhs ... no Sikh has anything against innocents of any background.

The truth is that all the multiple Genocides against Sikhs prove that our enemies won't be happy until they think they have exterminated all Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen that movie 'Four Lions'? Lol the white Moslem kept wanting to stage an ATt on their own temple to wind up the Muslims to a revolution. The guy was nuts

Veerji it's kind of like a copy of Indira Gandhi's method of getting her own forces like Azhar Muhammad Alam's Black Cats to kill innocent Hindu's.

And when people point out that Sant Ji was not a terrorist but Indira Gandhi was, the throwback reply is it's Hindophobia and that Sikhs won't be happy until ...

There is no faith community in the World that has had 35 of its main holy places desecrated and yet still did not react negatively against innocent Hindu's or Muslims.

If the boot was on the other foot I've no doubt the Sikh Panth would have been exterminated worse than Justice Khalra detailed.

And obviously 25% of the Sikh population was killed in the Genocide of Sikhs in Pakistan in 1947 which even KP Gill could never get close to in his dreams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen that movie 'Four Lions'? Lol the white Moslem kept wanting to stage an ATt on their own temple to wind up the Muslims to a revolution. The guy was nuts

Rubber dinghy rapids...

That movie was too funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use