superkaur 501 Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 How familiar is this story to what Sikhs suffered in Sikh history. Forced conversions, robbing of families, public mass beheadings, mass rapes of girls and women of their enemy, taking of land and homes,etc The same thing is happening to other non-muslims in the year 2014..... can any community ever be safe living in peace with mentally ill 7th century salafi sunni inhumane barbarians? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2726033/We-hundreds-Yazidi-slave-women-Syria-How-news-Sick-boast-British-jihadi-ISIS-captures-wives-siege-Mount-Sinjar.html 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jonny101 4,374 Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Interview with a commander of Islamic State. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2bf_1408148074 The guy shows the type of mentality that is running IS. Notice what he says about Yazidi people. Very disturbing. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
superkaur 501 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Religious fanatics from every religion work at the same level of stupidity. They think they will win but vanish soon from the world map. What of atheist extremists that are often part of western government's and corrupt atheist regimes that murdered millions over recent years in illegal unjust invasions and attacks? I think there is no difference between atheist extremists and abrahmic / islamic extremists both as violent mental as each other. And I noticed alot of indians are atheists by belief they dont believe in their fairy tales hinduism or ravidassism or other pagan cultist beliefs any more but believe in something called "hindu atheism". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
S4NGH 753 Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 What of atheist extremists that are often part of western government's and corrupt atheist regimes that murdered millions over recent years in illegal unjust invasions and attacks? I think there is no difference between atheist extremists and abrahmic / islamic extremists both as violent mental as each other. And I noticed alot of indians are atheists by belief they dont believe in their fairy tales hinduism or ravidassism or other pagan cultist beliefs any more but believe in something called "hindu atheism". And what of dharmik extremists? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
superkaur 501 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 And what of dharmik extremists? are you liberal? atheist? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
superkaur 501 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 I think dharmik extremists are the worst. Isis is an example. They are animals who have been fed the diet of religious extremism right from their birth and it's impossible for them to even acknowledge any other kind.i think the blame lies with their parents who probably can't think straight or we're not educated enough to help their illegitimate kids. If your not aware.... dharmik refers to eastern religious people (people of the indian subcontinent faiths and east asia). So what you said there is talking about abrahmic people. ISIS is islamic therefore from the western abrahmic faith groups. And no dharmik are not worse they are better than atheists better than pagans better than abrahmics much less violent, more spiritual and more willing to co-exist as long as you dont attack them. Abrahmics on the other hand are actively trying to provoke and convert everyone else to their ideology. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
superkaur 501 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Extreme of anything is bad. Parents should ensure their kids respect others, other faiths, other communities. If they can't do that then they shouldn't have kids. I think we should remember we ARE NOT THE ONLY KIND on this planet. To think we are the only ones best like Isis is the worst form of illiteracy. And western nations do have a very high rate of illiteracy as well. I can agree with that, extremism of any form of any ideology is usually a bad and negative thing. However to combat eg islamic extremists you have to be extreme. Such is the nature of the beast. Which is why after much atrocities by islamic extremists our Guru's taught Sikhs to fight back and by fighting back Sikhs had to be extreme and in being extreme they were able to defeat the jihadi hordes and create an Sikh empire that rivalled European nations. So extremism though bad is sometimes necessary to combat certain forms extremism that prevents people from being free or having their basic human rights respected 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ubertron 3 Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 @MotaSingh Ji Sorry Bhaji but i believe an Extreme Sikh would not behave in the way the islamists are. I agree with SuperKaur its do to the nature of Dharmic religions. At the core of Sikhi is love and understanding of all Wahegurus creation. Extreme muslims are simply following their religion more adherently than other muslims. A GOOD muslim is a extremist. Islam clearly dictates all the blood lust and insanity we are now seeing across the world. To be extremely good is never a bad thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jonny101 4,374 Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Mota Singh's veiled attack on Sikhs by grouping them with extremist Muslims just shows his own lack of awareness on these issues. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
13Mirch 1,172 Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Someone once said Muslims are the first victims of Islam. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
superkaur 501 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Mota Singh's veiled attack on Sikhs by grouping them with extremist Muslims just shows his own lack of awareness on these issues. I too noticed he didnt denounce islamic extremists who are raping girls and women on mass, brutalising innocent communities, mass murdering innocent civilians and prisoners of war which no Sikh "extremist" would do...... which the topic is on but he tried to lump all extremists together therefore we have to ask is he a sikh or is he a non sikh who used "mota (fat) singh" as a veiled joke and insult to sikhs? Islam is a tool that can be used easily to manipulate brainless or low IQ human beings into doing barbaric and nasty things to control other human beings. This is why alot of people are now connecting the dots and realise that the western govt regimes must be actively giving support to Islamic terrorists via their proxies in arab states who in turn fund and arm their islamic jihadi recruits for an agenda. That agenda is control and power over resources and manpower. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
13Mirch 1,172 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 Extreme of anything is bad. Parents should ensure their kids respect others, other faiths, other communities. If they can't do that then they shouldn't have kids. I think we should remember we ARE NOT THE ONLY KIND on this planet. To think we are the only ones best like Isis is the worst form of illiteracy. And western nations do have a very high rate of illiteracy as well. Is extreme humanism bad? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
guruvah 171 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 Someone once said Muslims are the first victims of Islam. Very true! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
garch 235 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 There would have been a time when gurus sikhs would have been despatched to defend the yazidi... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
geo 3 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 why are the yazidi people chosing not to convert to islam instead of death? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.