Tunisia Beach Attack

[StarStriker]

Actually sikhs do want to rule the world, its no secret, thats y we say "raj karega khalsa, aaki reheh na koiy".

Eduardo, ive already told u n explained to u about all this, in a past thread, re-read that again.

[StarStriker]

I don't think so much Mecca is the problem, I'd be very surprised if the Saudis allowed fanatical preachers to use Mecca as a stage. This is just an assumption of course, maybe you know for a fact Mecca is a voice for Fanatical islam. I think the bigger problem, is the small local mosques in Europe that are filled with extremists. They even use social media now a days, even a lone muslim in a 99.9% white town can get access to social media and get radicalized.

Yeah, I can see where you are coming from, but we don't really have set of "gurus law" like Shariah law.

I have seen that before, just uniting against common enemy, I'd be surprised if any unity still holds.

Geezer of course we have gurus/khalsa law, its basically wat we call maryada. Rehit maryada agreed by all sikhs factions was done pre-partition time. Also u then have nihang rules/regulations, which were sikh laws, as they were the rulers of the akal takht, even referred to as the 5th takht.

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon]

And one last thing, you'all like to do your prayers in Punjabi.

Muslims like to do their prayers in Arabic.

Bout time we started going back to doing our prayers in Latin.

So it all balances out of course, in the interests of a well balanced diverse society.

How would you like it if large numbers of us Christians started to pray in a language you don't understand?

I honestly think I should visit a good Sikh Temple, got any recommendations for the south east of UK, west london area?

Come on, thats a ridiculous point, Im sure no Sikh would care what langauge you choose to pray in. You can go find translations for any Sikh prayer you want anyways, if you want to know whats being said. I promise you we're not praying to have "kuffars" killed.

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon]

Geezer of course we have gurus/khalsa law, its basically wat we call maryada. Rehit maryada agreed by all sikhs factions was done pre-partition time. Also u then have nihang rules/regulations, which were sikh laws, as they were the rulers of the akal takht, even referred to as the 5th takht.

Sort of my point, every group/jatha has their own standards, but we have no set rules and punishments across the board. I wouldn't compare rehit maryada to shariah law anyways.

[StarStriker]

Sort of my point, every group/jatha has their own standards, but we have no set rules and punishments across the board. I wouldn't compare rehit maryada to shariah law anyways.

Nothing shud b compared to shariah law, pathetic man made rubbish.

Regarding sikhs, like i sed, buddah dal for example, were always the guardians of sikh law/order/do's/dont's, as they were the jathedars of akal takht, which in turn is the sole authority of sikhs.

We have shown, that wenever sikhs rule over land (ranjit singh/banda singh bahadur/misls), we rule justly and treat every1 as equals....same can never be said bowt muslim rulers, apart from akbar perhaps.

[eduardo]

Regarding the riots this is a great white mans response:

[eduardo]

I don't know much about these people.

But they sure as hell ain't Sikhs:

[SheikhYoBooty]

Ok Sangha let me take u up on your offer:

1. Do u believe pedophilia is wrong and bad (even if the pedophile in question is a Prophet of Allah)?

2. Do u think it is immoral for a 51 year old Arab slaveowner to marry a 6 year old girl?

3. Do u think it is immoral + evil for a 54 year old Arab slavetrader to sexually deflower a 9 year old girl called Aisha?

4. Do u believe slavery is morally acceptable just because the Quran condones slavery?

5. Because the Quran says men are free to have sex with their female slaves without consent do u think that is ok?

6. Because the Quran says women and slaves are inferior to male slavemasters do u think that is above criticism?

7. Because the Quran says women can be beaten if their husbands want to do u think that is above criticism?

8. Do u think terrorism supported by the Holy Quran is justifiable?

9. Do u think the Genocides carried out by Prophet Muhammad against non-Muslims should not be condemned?

10. Do u think it is fair that the Quran allows Prophet Muhammad unlimited wives and sexual slavegirls whilst restricting ordinary terrorists to just 4 wives (though normal Muslims are permitted unlimited numbers of sex slaves).

[eduardo]

Eduardo, ive already told u n explained to u about all this, in a past thread, re-read that again.

Thanks mate I will do that.

[eduardo]

Coming to a street near you:

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/05/man-carrying-isis-flag-near-parliament-not-arrested-police-criticised