Jump to content

Half Hindu-Half Sikh Families?


SeekerKaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are such families in which one son and his wife, kids, grandkids are Sikhs and another son and his family are Hindus.

As much as I have observed it is such families who are likely to call Sikhs Hindus or call themselves also Hindus and perform Hindu rituals as well. Due to such families Sikhs are called Hindus by many Hindus also.

Where did such families come from? Such families are most confusing. Some of them have say, an Amritdhari sister and jija but cousin will be a Hindu with cut bair, Hindu name and all. Or mother in law, father in law will be Hindu but only husband will be Sikh.

Men, women and kids of such families usually do Hindu rituals.

How did such families come about? What is their history and origin?

If one son became a Sikh then shouldn't he and his wife, kids, grandkids have always followed Sikhi properly instead of looking like Sikhs, sporting Sikh names yet still doing idol worship, pujas, vrats, kanjakan etc alongside? What's the point of "becoming" Sikh like this?

It is exactly such families that are used to defend interfaith marriages or claim Sikhs are sect of Hinduism or Hindus and Sikhs are same thing.

Kids of such families also look like confused lot and rather closer to Hindus. They might be wearing turban but know mantras more than Gurbani! And worship like Hindus (worship of Guru Granth Sahib is no different from idol worship for them, they just keep lighting diyas, incense around SGGS, put flowers or other chadhawa in front of it but rarely understand Gurbani nor do Nitnem regularly!)

These have been bane of Sikh community IMO and never bothered about Gurbani or Maryada (though rare exceptions might have been there).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are such families in which one son and his wife, kids, grandkids are Sikhs and another son and his family are Hindus.

As much as I have observed it is such families who are likely to call Sikhs Hindus or call themselves also Hindus and perform Hindu rituals as well. Due to such families Sikhs are called Hindus by many Hindus also.

Where did such families come from? Such families are most confusing. Some of them have say, an Amritdhari sister and jija but cousin will be a Hindu with cut bair, Hindu name and all. Or mother in law, father in law will be Hindu but only husband will be Sikh.

Men, women and kids of such families usually do Hindu rituals.

How did such families come about? What is their history and origin?

If one son became a Sikh then shouldn't he and his wife, kids, grandkids have always followed Sikhi properly instead of looking like Sikhs, sporting Sikh names yet still doing idol worship, pujas, vrats, kanjakan etc alongside? What's the point of "becoming" Sikh like this?

It is exactly such families that are used to defend interfaith marriages or claim Sikhs are sect of Hinduism or Hindus and Sikhs are same thing.

Kids of such families also look like confused lot and rather closer to Hindus. They might be wearing turban but know mantras more than Gurbani! And worship like Hindus (worship of Guru Granth Sahib is no different from idol worship for them, they just keep lighting diyas, incense around SGGS, put flowers or other chadhawa in front of it but rarely understand Gurbani nor do Nitnem regularly!)

These have been bane of Sikh community IMO and never bothered about Gurbani or Maryada (though rare exceptions might have been there).

How did such families come about? What is their history and origin?

Well, they are the khatri and arora sikhs, i,e the urban Sikhs that run big business. To understand how it all came about one needs to first of all go right back and consult Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji because Guru ji mentions how the way they go wichever way the money is was a problem even back then. Guru ji says :

"the kshatriyas (khatris) have abandoned their religion and embraced a foreign language". What Guru ji is saying there is that they were gladly embracing Islam just to keep hold of their money and wealth. Fast forward to the time of Maharaja Ranjit Singh and the Sikh Empire and you find that the Hindu khatris were doing exactly the same thing again in order to gain wealth. Because Sikhs were the power, controlling a vast empire, Hindu khatris started deliberately making one of their sons a Sikh so that he could gain high positions in government and thus earn the family vast money. People like the former Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh and the famous Indian author Kushwant Singh of banta santa fame are prime examples of these families. So, you see, the beard and turban for them was adopted not so much for love of the religion but more as a way of adding to their wealth. Underneath though, they have always simply been Hindus with turbans.

Fast forward to 1947 and partition and we find the same thing being repeated again. Rather than remaining true to their religion the richer ones were more keen to hang on to their wealth and money and so decided to remain in Lahore by discarding Sikhism or Hinduism and embracing Islam. They still exist in Pakistan and are known as the big mega-rich industralist familes. What they did though is change their 'caste' name to 'sheikh' or khoj.

Anyway, you asked who they are and their origins so now you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are such families in which one son and his wife, kids, grandkids are Sikhs and another son and his family are Hindus.

As much as I have observed it is such families who are likely to call Sikhs Hindus or call themselves also Hindus and perform Hindu rituals as well. Due to such families Sikhs are called Hindus by many Hindus also.

Where did such families come from? Such families are most confusing. Some of them have say, an Amritdhari sister and jija but cousin will be a Hindu with cut bair, Hindu name and all. Or mother in law, father in law will be Hindu but only husband will be Sikh.

Men, women and kids of such families usually do Hindu rituals.

How did such families come about? What is their history and origin?

If one son became a Sikh then shouldn't he and his wife, kids, grandkids have always followed Sikhi properly instead of looking like Sikhs, sporting Sikh names yet still doing idol worship, pujas, vrats, kanjakan etc alongside? What's the point of "becoming" Sikh like this?

It is exactly such families that are used to defend interfaith marriages or claim Sikhs are sect of Hinduism or Hindus and Sikhs are same thing.

Kids of such families also look like confused lot and rather closer to Hindus. They might be wearing turban but know mantras more than Gurbani! And worship like Hindus (worship of Guru Granth Sahib is no different from idol worship for them, they just keep lighting diyas, incense around SGGS, put flowers or other chadhawa in front of it but rarely understand Gurbani nor do Nitnem regularly!)

These have been bane of Sikh community IMO and never bothered about Gurbani or Maryada (though rare exceptions might have been there).

these are those people who during british raj got their knickers in a bunch because Sikhs got better respect and pay then aam hindu/muslim soldiers so they hatched a plan to make one son a Sikh to cash in on that whilst in their heart they are all really hindus. Gurbani has described such Hindus ... They would probably have two thousand fits if their kids became pukke gursikhs through and through...and you can be sure they will be the type of sikhs in the RSS enrollment scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many other faiths that respect Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji, not just Sikhs. Sindhis are one of them. Maharaj ji are Jagat da Guru, not just exclusive to Amritdhari Sikhs. The reason that only one is a Sikh in the family is because one family is trying to embrace Sikhi whilst the others half are Hindus. So they won't let go of the rituals and Hindu faith side as they think they will disrespect the whole family.

They won't let go and stick to one faith as they don't want to and they see the other faith as part of them too.

It is confusing for the soul, because dho berian vich pairh nai rakhe jande.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

It could be because that's the literal way people were Sehajdharis. Non-Sikhs trying to go closer to GurSikhi, these weren't Hindus who were giving their son to Sikhi, rather Sehajdharis of Hindu origin. Why is because if every Khatri gave only their eldest son which is the story most people believe, then Sikhi would be a bigger religion just with them; however, most Sikhs aren't Khatri they are mostly Vanjaria, (Jatts officially; however, any statistic which includes Vanjarias would prove that wrong). Sikhi appealed to the "lower" castes so many Vanjarias became Sikh in large numbers also not everyone became a GurSikh at once and rather slowly through the generations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these are those people who during british raj got their knickers in a bunch because Sikhs got better respect and pay then aam hindu/muslim soldiers so they hatched a plan to make one son a Sikh to cash in on that whilst in their heart they are all really hindus. Gurbani has described such Hindus ... They would probably have two thousand fits if their kids became pukke gursikhs through and through...and you can be sure they will be the type of sikhs in the RSS enrollment scheme.

I usually find them making fun of Amritdharis and calling them kattar.

These people have even stopped giving their younger generation Sikh names now.

They seem to have little knowledge of Sikhi or Sikh history except going to Gurudwara, usually do not even pronounce Gurbani properly.

Keshdhari Hindus at most!

They also interpret events of Punjab differently and one can find them blaming Sant ji, praising Indira or blaming Sikhs for inviting attacks on themselves in 1984 and beyond.

Though they might have encountered mobs or discrimination and mockery against them due to their "Sikh identity" still they seem to feel closer to Hindus and brush it off thinking it was one off phenomenon or something that happens to everyone.

They like to consider themselves "liberal" and "modern".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone can convert to Sikhi just so you know.. What religion do you think most Indian Punjabis were before they became Sikh?? Even if you see a historical Hindu temple in Punjab, you will see a lot of sardars flocking over there to receive the blessing from whatever devta resides there. Nothing really surprising about that.

But a Sikh only turns to Waheguru for blessings, so even though it's not surprising seeing them do it, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do either. Waheguru are the only ones that will truly bless, even the devtas are asking for their blessings, as everything is under the creation of God.

In Japji Sahib ji, we are told:

ਏਕਾ ਮਾਈ ਜੁਗਤਿ ਵਿਆਈ ਤਿਨਿ ਚੇਲੇ ਪਰਵਾਣੁ ॥

एका माई जुगति विआई तिनि चेले परवाणु ॥

Ėkā mā▫ī jugaṯ vi▫ā▫ī ṯin cẖele parvāṇ.

The unique Mother (Master) formulating a plan of propagation installed three approved disciples.

ਇਕੁ ਸੰਸਾਰੀ ਇਕੁ ਭੰਡਾਰੀ ਇਕੁ ਲਾਏ ਦੀਬਾਣੁ ॥

इकु संसारी इकु भंडारी इकु लाए दीबाणु ॥

Ik sansārī ik bẖandārī ik lā▫e ḏībāṇ.

One the world's creator (Brahma), one steward who gives sustenance (Vishnu) and one who has the disposition of destroying (Shiva).

Then Guruji says:

ਜਿਵ ਤਿਸੁ ਭਾਵੈ ਤਿਵੈ ਚਲਾਵੈ ਜਿਵ ਹੋਵੈ ਫੁਰਮਾਣੁ ॥

जिव तिसु भावै तिवै चलावै जिव होवै फुरमाणु ॥

Jiv ṯis bẖāvai ṯivai cẖalāvai jiv hovai furmāṇ.

As it pleases Him and as is His order, He makes them walk.

ਓਹੁ ਵੇਖੈ ਓਨਾ ਨਦਰਿ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਬਹੁਤਾ ਏਹੁ ਵਿਡਾਣੁ ॥

ओहु वेखै ओना नदरि न आवै बहुता एहु विडाणु ॥

Oh vekẖai onā naḏar na āvai bahuṯā ehu vidāṇ.

He beholds them but they see Him not. This is the greatest wonder.

SGGS Ang 7

?? Dhan Guru Nanak Dev ji

Guruji says even they are begging for Name of the Lord.

ਜਿਸੁ ਨਾਮੈ ਕਉ ਤਰਸਹਿ ਬਹੁ ਦੇਵਾ ॥

जिसु नामै कउ तरसहि बहु देवा ॥

Jis nāmai ka▫o ṯarsėh baho ḏevā.

The Lord's Name, for which crave many gods,

ਸਗਲ ਭਗਤ ਜਾ ਕੀ ਕਰਦੇ ਸੇਵਾ ॥

सगल भगत जा की करदे सेवा ॥

Sagal bẖagaṯ jā kī karḏe sevā.

whose service all the devotes perform,

ਅਨਾਥਾ ਨਾਥੁ ਦੀਨ ਦੁਖ ਭੰਜਨੁ ਸੋ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੇ ਤੇ ਪਾਇਣਾ ॥੩॥

अनाथा नाथु दीन दुख भंजनु सो गुर पूरे ते पाइणा ॥३॥

Anāthā nāth ḏīn ḏukẖ bẖanjan so gur pūre ṯe pā▫iṇā. ||3||

and who is the Patron of the patronless and is the Destroyer of the pain of the poor; that Name is obtained through the Perfect Guru.

SGGS Ang 1078

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's historical I hear. I've luckily got none in my extended family but had a work colleague whom married a Hindu girl.

We get it all mixed up, we're to respect all Religions but remain truthful to our own.

Satkaar sare dharam da, phar vere apne pitta de rehna. - Respect all religions but remain In the garden of our father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use