Jump to content

Half Hindu-Half Sikh Families?


SeekerKaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2

Sikhi of course did not come from Hinduism, but besides our Guru Sahibs, the Sikhs did come from Hinduism Kaur ji.

How do you know most of them were from Hindu background? (Many might have been)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhi of course did not come from Hinduism, but besides our Guru Sahibs, the Sikhs did come from Hinduism Kaur ji.

Kaur ji I am not insulting Devi Devtas in any way, as I have mentioned before they are obviously more pure than most humans. I was just saying if we can ask for help from other humans, then why not them when they do not mind? If it is okay for us to hire tutors etc, why can't we just ask a devta for gyan about whatever subject we are studying instead?? I know this seems like B.S. to you and maybe others, but those Gods are here to help those who ask. I know you will say we can turn to Sri Vaheguru ji for gyan/anything, but that does not mean we are chalak if we ask for help from a God sent tutor or a God sent Goddess.

I don't think when people go to the Mandir for only namashkar they would take an Aarti thaali with an jyot on the thaali Kaur ji. While I agree there are people as you describe, there are also people as I describe.

jkvlondon ji, I hope you have realized that Indra is an title of that position in devlok, so please do not disrespect all Indras because of one Indra.

Dear Kaur ji, I am no way telling people to start visiting Mandirs, I am just telling the truth of many Sikhs visiting those temples. You are right that all Sikhs do not visit there. That is very rude of you to question my Amrit that I have received from Sri Guru Sahib's kirpa.

No they did not come from Hinduism.

I didn't say you are insulting Devi/devtas. Read it again, I said I think you want others to insult them, so you can do your favourite dialogue "hoo haa nindiya karde".

Do what you want to do, I don't care.

And as for you making out Jkvlondon penji is disrespecting, the only disrespectful thoughts are yours at the moment, disrespecting what others say, which are as the Gurus say, so therefore you are disrespecting Gurujis words.

It's not rude of me in anything I have said to you, because I did not question you.

The problem with you is, you just don't read and try to understand anything. Read what I wrote again and tell me what I've wrote wrong when you understand what I wrote.

I feel I have not written anything that Guruji does not say and tell us themselves. I haven't even made a judgement on you. I just said it as it is, plain and clear, the Gurus teachings, so don't Kaur ji me when you can't read what I write. Kaur ji di lagdi. ?

Mere nal hi pange lendi rendi, hor koi kam ni?

You seem to come across as very rude and very defensive whenever I write Gurujis words of truth.

Par binga baal kithe sidha hunda.

The Gurus were born Sikhs straight from Waheguru they were sent as Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From now on you can address me by simran345, thus will stop your confusion. And no need for the false ji when you don't mean it.

And to the rest of your reply:

Like I said before, hor koi kam ni tanu, pasaad paun tho bina.

Why are you even bringing up their backgrounds? Because of the word Hindu? ?

When the Gurus themselves had no interest in the background they were born into but humanity, why are you so adamant to state that?

It doesn't make them that background, they cut off all links with background, only the light of God shone through them.

To the rest of your reply: Whatever. You're off your rocker ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was talking about the followers Simran Kaur ji, not about our Sri Guru Sahib jis. Who says that the ji doesn't mean anything for me?? Why wouldn't anyone address a fellow singhni with a ji.

But all followers are not from Hindu backgrounds. Good to see you are able to convey respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use