Jump to content

Art Exhibiton Commemorating 365 Days Of Bapu Surat Singh Khalsa's Hungerstrike


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hunger strikes are extremely powerfull tools. Extremely powerfull.

Arguably, it was the hunger strike of the Irish nationalist Bobby Sands in 1981, and the subsequent deaths of the other Irish hunger strikers, that led to Britain conceding defeat in their fight against the concept of Irish nationalism because the British government's harsh reaction to those deaths was eventually seen as inhuman, much as the Indian government's and the Punjab government's would also be seen. The fact that we are not having the same effect....and in essence not having any positive effect whatsoever in comparison with historical facts about all hunger strikes can best be summed up thus: The first hunger striker died after 43 days and the last hanged on 'till the 73rd day.

We, the Sikhs, salute and stand alongside baba Surat Singh because his struggle is our struggle but....sometimes, we should take a step back and analyse why our struggle gets us nowhere and we are, arguably, in an even worse position today with regards to political rights than we were 30 years ago. Is our struggle merely to reassure and garner support amongst ourselves or is it to convince our oppressors that we are serious about what we do ? I ask this because headlines such as "Babu Surat Singh on his 365th day of hunger strike" means alot to me, as a Sikh already part of the cause but to the people we're trying to reach.........the Indians we're trying to teach about human rights and dignity....it just comes across as another example of what they percieve as the uneducated backwardness of Sikhs. They, who already have jokes about their stereotype image of us, look at those kind of headlines and wonder why they shoud take seriously a community that doesn't realise it is articulating a hunger strike day tally that is not only physically impossible but also 4 times greater than what has ever been achieved by a human being.

To get freedom.......to get our human rights........we need to step inside the shoes of our oppressors and understand what they're thinking. Some of them have been to Cambridge, some of them have been to Harvard. Even those that haven't know what the words 'Hunger Strike' mean. We, the western born educated sons and daughters of the Sikhs from Punjab need to understand that we are fighting a war with an enemy....we ARE at war, but this is not a war being faught with guns and rocket launchers. THIS, is a war of intellect. A war where reason will prevail. Reason, is with us. Barbarity is with them. '365 days of a hunger strike' is not an expression reasonable, educated......the wining side of an intellectual war....uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunger strikes are extremely powerfull tools. Extremely powerfull.

Arguably, it was the hunger strike of the Irish nationalist Bobby Sands in 1981, and the subsequent deaths of the other Irish hunger strikers, that led to Britain conceding defeat in their fight against the concept of Irish nationalism because the British government's harsh reaction to those deaths was eventually seen as inhuman, much as the Indian government's and the Punjab government's would also be seen. The fact that we are not having the same effect....and in essence not having any positive effect whatsoever in comparison with historical facts about all hunger strikes can best be summed up thus: The first hunger striker died after 43 days and the last hanged on 'till the 73rd day.

We, the Sikhs, salute and stand alongside baba Surat Singh because his struggle is our struggle but....sometimes, we should take a step back and analyse why our struggle gets us nowhere and we are, arguably, in an even worse position today with regards to political rights than we were 30 years ago. Is our struggle merely to reassure and garner support amongst ourselves or is it to convince our oppressors that we are serious about what we do ? I ask this because headlines such as "Babu Surat Singh on his 365th day of hunger strike" means alot to me, as a Sikh already part of the cause but to the people we're trying to reach.........the Indians we're trying to teach about human rights and dignity....it just comes across as another example of what they percieve as the uneducated backwardness of Sikhs. They, who already have jokes about their stereotype image of us, look at those kind of headlines and wonder why they shoud take seriously a community that doesn't realise it is articulating a hunger strike day tally that is not only physically impossible but also 4 times greater than what has ever been achieved by a human being.

To get freedom.......to get our human rights........we need to step inside the shoes of our oppressors and understand what they're thinking. Some of them have been to Cambridge, some of them have been to Harvard. Even those that haven't know what the words 'Hunger Strike' mean. We, the western born educated sons and daughters of the Sikhs from Punjab need to understand that we are fighting a war with an enemy....we ARE at war, but this is not a war being faught with guns and rocket launchers. THIS, is a war of intellect. A war where reason will prevail. Reason, is with us. Barbarity is with them. '365 days of a hunger strike' is not an expression reasonable, educated......the wining side of an intellectual war....uses.

longer hunger strikes have been performed. Mohamed Soltan lasted longer and that was just last year
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use