Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
10 minutes ago, Kira said:

That doesn't answer my question. If anything it raises more questions, If the Nihangs made sure every Gurudwara kept prakash of Dasam Granth then when the Singh Sabha took over they obviously stopped it. But the Nihangs kept it going, in other words the people who have more love for it are the Nihangs, so again why would they spear their father's treasure.

If you read through my previous posts, I'm not exactly pro-Singh Sabha, but somebody pierced Dasam Granth and nobody is claiming any side. But to answer that question, it's probably the same with Anti-Pad-Shed folk, who downright insult Non-Larivar Saroops of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, (you'll even find those folk lurking on this forum, claiming love for Guru Sahib). I'm sorry to anyone who hates Pad Shed so much, but I think it's probably the same thing with the Nihangs, they felt the Saroop wasn't complete or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

If you read through my previous posts, I'm not exactly pro-Singh Sabha, but somebody pierced Dasam Granth and nobody is claiming any side. But to answer that question, it's probably the same with Anti-Pad-Shed folk, who downright insult Non-Larivar Saroops of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, (you'll even find those folk lurking on this forum, claiming love for Guru Sahib). I'm sorry to anyone who hates Pad Shed so much, but I think it's probably the same thing with the Nihangs, they felt the Saroop wasn't complete or something.

The Nihangs wouldn't dare spear a Gutka Sahib let alone a Saroop, why would there be an incomplete Saroop parkashed at Akal Takhat of all places. All of them love Dasam Pita's bani irregardless wheather its within a Gutka Sahib or not. I think you're very confused, I'd rather trust the Nihangs in this as they have evidence for their love of Dasam Granth, Singh Sabha don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
3 minutes ago, Kira said:

The Nihangs wouldn't dare spear a Gutka Sahib let alone a Saroop, why would there be an incomplete Saroop parkashed at Akal Takhat of all places. All of them love Dasam Pita's bani irregardless wheather its within a Gutka Sahib or not. I think you're very confused, I'd rather trust the Nihangs in this as they have evidence for their love of Dasam Granth, Singh Sabha don't. 

So who did spear Dasam Granth? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
21 minutes ago, Mahakaal96 said:

I had a slight suspicion that you were retarted but I am convinced that you are now! Your saying the Nihangs speared their own granth, said it was full of filth, threw it out of a window but then took it with them & then continued to do Prakash of Dasam Granth until this day at all their gurdwaras & chaunis??!!

waa vi waa.... these are the type of people we need in our panth.... intellect like this the panth will definitely flourish (face palm) 

Man, read some of the retarded stufft you've written on this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AnonSengh

We have actual factual evidence that Guru Gobind Singh Jee did Parkash of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji (Bhatt Narbud Singh). Where are these people getting this info that Guru Gobind Singh Jee Patshah did Sri Dasam Granth Parkash and gave both Granths gurgaddi?

Sri Dasam Granth Parkash was only started in the mid-1800's, no earlier source writes that Sri Dasam Granth parkash was done. Another reason why I think this practice of doing Sri Dasam Granth parkash on the same Takht as Guru Jee is man made by us because we now have people doing Parkash of Sarabloh Granth too, this is nowhere written in History. Also, Sri Dasam Granth is not even a standard Granth. Sikhs from back in the day used to make their own Pothis of Dasam Baani that they called the Dasam Granth.

It was only until 1897, under Khem Singh Bedi's (Same Guy who Ran the Singh Sabha) Sodhak Committee standardized the Sri Dasam Granth that is being printed for over a century now.

The Sri Akaal Takht Gurmata from 2008 makes it clear no Granth can be Parkash next to Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj (Share the same Takht Posh).

Second, the people who are saying the Singh Sabha Lehar was a British-supported movement are wrong. This "Singh Sabha British Movement" scapegoat is bakwas, this claim has no proper evidence to support it. The British actually considered the Singh Sabha Lehar as a movement to oppose them (which is was), and they thought the SGPC/Akali-Dal were fanatics.

Just wanted to say somethings,

Bul Chuk Muaaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
15 minutes ago, Guest AnonSengh said:

We have actual factual evidence that Guru Gobind Singh Jee did Parkash of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji (Bhatt Narbud Singh). Where are these people getting this info that Guru Gobind Singh Jee Patshah did Sri Dasam Granth Parkash and gave both Granths gurgaddi?

Sri Dasam Granth Parkash was only started in the mid-1800's, no earlier source writes that Sri Dasam Granth parkash was done. Another reason why I think this practice of doing Sri Dasam Granth parkash on the same Takht as Guru Jee is man made by us because we now have people doing Parkash of Sarabloh Granth too, this is nowhere written in History. Also, Sri Dasam Granth is not even a standard Granth. Sikhs from back in the day used to make their own Pothis of Dasam Baani that they called the Dasam Granth.

It was only until 1897, under Khem Singh Bedi's (Same Guy who Ran the Singh Sabha) Sodhak Committee standardized the Sri Dasam Granth that is being printed for over a century now.

The Sri Akaal Takht Gurmata from 2008 makes it clear no Granth can be Parkash next to Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj (Share the same Takht Posh).

Second, the people who are saying the Singh Sabha Lehar was a British-supported movement are wrong. This "Singh Sabha British Movement" scapegoat is bakwas, this claim has no proper evidence to support it. The British actually considered the Singh Sabha Lehar as a movement to oppose them (which is was), and they thought the SGPC/Akali-Dal were fanatics.

Just wanted to say somethings,

Bul Chuk Muaaf

Dasam Granth was written by Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, it was made with all the banis, (except Zafarnama), before 1699, and Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji wrote Zafarnama, just before Aurangzeb was dead. To the 19th century Brit stanards, anyone not saying their Christian would be a fanatic, specifically Anglican, we have our own standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AnonSengh
7 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Dasam Granth was written by Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji, it was made with all the banis, (except Zafarnama), before 1699, and Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji wrote Zafarnama, just before Aurangzeb was dead.

That Bir (from 1698/1755 BK) has simple mistakes, like it saying: ੴ ਸ੍ਰੀਸਤਿਗੁਰਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ॥. Why would a mistake like this be in a Bir from Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time. I'm not gonna rule anything out, but this Bir should get some more Khoj done on it.

The history of Sri Dasam Granth is hazy, we need to do more Khoj on it. If this bir was in access of Bhai Mani Singh, why was he looking around for the small Granths that make up Sri Dasam Granth?

Also, about the Spear Story, lets look at the photo of the Bir:3-c5f5d2f53b.jpg

 

It looks as if it is Fire Damage or Acid Damage, or maybe Mold, as you can see the Brown Ring Around the Top.

Bul Chuk Muaaf!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guest AnonSengh said:

That Bir (from 1698/1755 BK) has simple mistakes, like it saying: ੴ ਸ੍ਰੀਸਤਿਗੁਰਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ॥. Why would a mistake like this be in a Bir from Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time. I'm not gonna rule anything out, but this Bir should get some more Khoj done on it.

The history of Sri Dasam Granth is hazy, we need to do more Khoj on it. If this bir was in access of Bhai Mani Singh, why was he looking around for the small Granths that make up Sri Dasam Granth?

Also, about the Spear Story, lets look at the photo of the Bir:3-c5f5d2f53b.jpg

 

It looks as if it is Fire Damage or Acid Damage, or maybe Mold, as you can see the Brown Ring Around the Top.

Bul Chuk Muaaf!

That's definetely mold damage around the wound there.

As for the bir there's multiple saroops of Dasam Granth, all of them excluding Zafernama but they seem to match up just fine. Where did you hear that some of them had mistakes from? would love to see the sources as its pretty intriguing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes that was original Granth by Guru Arjan Dev in 1604. The original one still exists. 10th Guru added 116 hymns of his father. This is called copy of Damdama and declared Guru.  
    • Isn't there Adi Granth as well?
    • 1) Guru Granth Sahib with 5,894 hymns. (Note this Granth was given Guruship). It has 1430 pages. Granths by Guru Gobind Singh :-  2) Dasam Granth with 17,293 verses in 1428 pages. 3) Sarbloh Granth in 4,361 stanzas 862 pages in print. There are number of other works by various poets like Suraj Parkash, Bhai Gurdas and Nand Lal.
    • Man just learn boxing or take a shastar training. You don't have a 2 foot talwar or khanda in 2025's Western World. Today ur either gonna get stabbed (uk), shot (America) or attacked by a meth head (Punjab) in street fights. By the time u draw the sword that guy's got you on the floor probably searching your Kacherra for coins lol Only good thing he did was the Loh Mushti video (boxing with the kara as a knuckleduster) but even then just get a normal knuckleduster if you can. Though before ANYTHING any Sikh interested in martial arts has to train two things as the bare minimum: UNARMED FIGHTING (boxing preferably) and KIRPAN TRAINING. Loh Mushti is good but only when you lost ur kirpan somehow in a fight (which shouldn't rlly happen if you train on how to use it. If the bad guys wanna use knives n guns then the Khalsa who's here to stop em has to better at their own game than them. NO Sikh in America has an excuse not to own a gun, and if their state allows public carry they should be the first to accept it.
    • Sikhs have missed the point: Shastar Vidhiya means "the science of (hand-held) weapons", not just the style nihangs do or gatka. Gatka and "shastar vidhiya" are "bad" for 2 reasons: You can't actually practice them properly cos its deadly. Same issue with karate; you can't free spar full force with traditional techniques cos someone'd probably die, so its impracticality goes unchecked. But boxing spars full force, so you know what works. And if you ever do have to defend someone w gatka and the thug has a stick too (unlikely) you wouldn't know how to take a full force hit cos in training you had to take it light. That one hit will shake you more than you realise and probably make u lose if ur not used to it.  You likely don't carry a 2 foot sword/gatka stick in the West unless going to training. And a thug doesn't either; he's got a knife (uk) or a gun (USA . Gatka may beat knife, but even field hockey sticks will beat someone with a normal knife cos of reach, gatka di lorh nhi haegi specifically. But if they got a gun, the only defence is quicker draw time and better aim (which you'll learn at shooting class, never at gatka) Basically, Guru Gobind Singh Ji told us to learn "the science of weapons" to defend people, but we train an art with a weapon nobody carries today (nobody takes a gatka stick when they step out to get atta) and one that we can never spar with fully and thus we don't even know what it feels like to get hit with it properly. If you train to preserve history or perform shows, then that's fine. But it's NOT part of a Sikh's military training anymore and won't help you much in fights (for which we must be "tyaar by tyaar" , always ready).  (PS: Gatka may have a few skills like movement and observation that can help in fights, but all its practical stuff like that is also in MMA, plus much more. Nothing that's exclusive to arts like gatka will help practically).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use