Jump to content

Distinguishing Between Good and Bad


Recommended Posts

WJKK WJKF,

below are some parchariks who are worth listening to, as well as some who are ignorant and virus. (Feel free to add)

GOOD:

Giani Sher Singh ji Ambale wale 

Giani Kulwant Singh ji Ludhiane Wale 

Giani Thakur Singh ji Patiale Wale

Bhai Sukha singh ji UK

Basics of Sikhi

Giani Sant Singh ju Maskeen 

Bhai Pinderpal Singh ji

Giani Amarjit Singh

 

To avoid:

Panthpreet "Singh"

Sarbjit Dhunda

Ranjit "Singh" Dhadrianwale

Darshan "Singh"

Gurbakshn Kala Afghana

Dhumma

Others: linked to the above.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Curious to know why you've put  Ranjit "Singh" Dhadrianwale under bad? Am I missing something? 

I used to love them, honestly but their latest videos indicate how they have become so much like Panthpreet.

1. Messing with the history of Guru Tegh Bahadhur Maharaj ji- 26 years in pora sahib; Sant giani gurbachan singh ji has confirmed this and Dhadrianwale has been refusing to accept it, referring to a book written by the same person who addressed Sri Dasam Guru granth sahib ji as Kanjar Granth.

2. Says there is no point in doing simran.

3. Says he was doing Haramzaadgi by calling himself a sant.

 

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

I used to love them, honestly but their latest videos indicate how they have become so much like Panthpreet.

1. Messing with the history of Guru Tegh Bahadhur Maharaj ji- 26 years in pora sahib; Sant giani gurbachan singh ji has confirmed this and Dhadrianwale has been refusing to accept it, referring to a book written by the same person who addressed Sri Dasam Guru granth sahib ji as Kanjar Granth.

2. Says there is no point in doing simran.

3. Says he was doing Haramzaadgi by calling himself a sant.

 

:)

I don't about the first point you've stated, as I don't listen to him much myself, so I can't comment on what I don't know of or not heard. 

Also never heard the other too points either, but then again I don't listen to him much, only when he comes on Tv. 

But I noticed, you call him by them and they, and that's normally used in respect of somebody, so seems like you like some of his parchaar, but not all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, simran345 said:

I don't about the first point you've stated, as I don't listen to him much myself, so I can't comment on what I don't know of or not heard. 

Also never heard the other too points either, but then again I don't listen to him much, only when he comes on Tv. 

But I noticed, you call him by them and they, and that's normally used in respect of somebody, so seems like you like some of his parchaar, but not all. 

Even avoided using DHADRIANWALA. Because they once did good parchar, and there will always be a part where I may not be able to disrespect them completely. For the betterment of the panth, it has to be distinguished 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

Even avoided using DHADRIANWALA. Because they once did good parchar, and there will always be a part where I may not be able to disrespect them completely. For the betterment of the panth, it has to be distinguished 

Ok you have your own opinion and I can't argue with that. Just wasn't sure if the reasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a similar reaction , bhai Ranjit singh  in the early days he allowed bewakoof loki to matha tek etc but now he has matured the whole way up and told people to call him BHai because he has no claim on anything .

His latest parchaar vids have been calling out dodgy parchaar and behaviours in the panth and trying to encourage the sangat to lose their greed, lose the pakhandi baba habit and reattach to gurbani .

I have never heard him say naam simran is pointless (maybe you can provide the link). 

He openly admits his wrong behaviour of the past (isn't that a good thing?) and tells people NOT to call him anything if they must then brother.

I would put Giani Thakur SIngh patialawale in a third category questionable 

athough the general content of itihaasic katha is correct he embroiders a lot and make claims which makes sangat doubt the rest of the katha.

 

puzzled, but its your opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

I had a similar reaction , bhai Ranjit singh  in the early days he allowed bewakoof loki to matha tek etc but now he has matured the whole way up and told people to call him BHai because he has no claim on anything .

His latest parchaar vids have been calling out dodgy parchaar and behaviours in the panth and trying to encourage the sangat to lose their greed, lose the pakhandi baba habit and reattach to gurbani .

I have never heard him say naam simran is pointless (maybe you can provide the link). 

He openly admits his wrong behaviour of the past (isn't that a good thing?) and tells people NOT to call him anything if they must then brother.

I would put Giani Thakur SIngh patialawale in a third category questionable 

athough the general content of itihaasic katha is correct he embroiders a lot and make claims which makes sangat doubt the rest of the katha.

 

puzzled, but its your opinion

Bhenji, 

dhadrianwale has changed. He is doing what these missionary parchariks are doing. If you listen to his latest videos, you will be shocked at his claims.

 

giani thakur singh are a gem. Just because our budi fails to believe and understand they are saying doesn't mean they should be questioned. (TRUST ME ON THIS ONE)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

Bhenji, 

dhadrianwale has changed. He is doing what these missionary parchariks are doing. If you listen to his latest videos, you will be shocked at his claims.

 

giani thakur singh are a gem. Just because our budi fails to believe and understand they are saying doesn't mean they should be questioned. (TRUST ME ON THIS ONE)

 

don't  worry I do believe in the avasta of sant ji  and the nature of the shaheeds but he should realise just speaking of them is enough .

latest vid of ranjit singh:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am in big dilemma.  As we all know that waheguru ji everywhere. I also understand that it is important to go to gurudwara sahib as well. My question is that if i do ardaas at home or any other place other than  gurudwara sahib, will it be heard and acknowledged by guru sahib or it is always important to go to gurudwara sahib and do ardaas at gurudwara sahib for guru sahib to acknowledge it? I always do path and ardaas at home in front of harmandir sahib photo or hazur sahib photo  and then for important things i make a list and go to gurudwara sahib to do the ardaas there because i think that if i do ardaas in front of guru granth sahib then it will be more accepted by guru sahib. On the other hand i think that if i am doing ardaas in front of harmandir sahib or hazur sahib photo and redoing the same ardaas at gurudwara sahib, i feel that i am not respecting the authority of harmandir sahib or hazur sahib. Because of all this, I wait to find a quite time at gurudwara sahib when there is less or no sangat  so that I can open my list and read and do ardaas spend 10-15 minutes on average to do ardaas. If there are lot of people, i can't do ardaas due to people in the lineup and I don't want to block access to them while i am spending so much time doing ardaas. If i leave without doing ardaas then i am embarrassed, disappointed and sad and then OCD kicks in. Kindly help!    
    • Play/do gurbani, simran and keertan often, make sure you do your nitnem, use sarbloh and wear sarbloh!
    • process is to find a vichola and then the vichola talks between your family and theirs. The process should be similar to how rishta is done in India side!
    • No. If you read the histroy of Guru jis' times and even centuries later, usually marriages were done in childhood. Then when they were old enough to start their grihast jeevan partnership, the bride is brought over to her husbands's house in muklawa ceremony. 4-5 years engagement is silly. You get Anand Karaj now, and then after university she you do muklawa, that is much more in the guidelines!
    • you need to explain that even the devtay kept their kes, and is a part of the ancestors' culture, that sikhi is also preserving the kshatriya and dharmik cultures!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use