Jump to content

What are Sikh and Hindu Punjabi relations like in 2017


Guest Punjabi Hindu
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Guest Punjabi Hindu said:

Sorry what do u mean by this. The majority of Punjabi Hindus want communal harmony and love between our two communities

What do you think of what Sikhs want ? Bad rift between them or wanted peace between them? What do you think of what Sikh community wants.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2017 at 3:57 PM, Guest Punjabi Hindu said:

Hindu Sikh relations in 2017

How are the relations between these two communities

They're good on the surface level, but I don't see much love deep down for each other. Both groups although interact are very segregated from each other. I assume we are diverging exponentially. Both don't really know much about each other's customs and therefore I can only see this cleaving further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The apt representation of relationship of Hindus and Sikhs is like that of Kauravas and Pandavas.

Hindus = Kurus

Sikhs = Pandavas (5) 

Both were cousins, but kurus always tried to humiliate Pandavas by taking their throne , eating their share of inheritance , and humilating them and their women.

Kurus were more in number and had more power and support of sages and the like , had more resources than Pandavas.

But God was in support of Pandavas and we know how it ended with the kurus.

As kurus did to pandus , so are the Hindus did/ still doing to Sikhs. 

"Muh pe bhaai , peeth peeche kasaai" 

Everyone is aware of RSS agenda.

I believe mahabharat is not an epic of past but of future to come . That would explain why it had weapons resembling modern day nuclear weapons .

 

Ok lets forget about Hindus and Sikhs for a moment. Hindu nationalist organizations like to make up stuff out of thin air , like "dharmic brotherhood" , a uniting feeling of Indian born religions - Hindus , Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains.

Sikhism is still a child if one looks at religions based on their age, so one should see Hindus interaction with Buddhists and Jains. 

Pushyamitra Shunga, ruler of Shunga empire , who was a brahmin himself ordered the destruction of buddhist monasteries and nalanda and taxila , and rewarded anyone who would come with the head of a buddhist monk.

Jains were massacred similary and their temples destroyed.

So this "dharmic brotherhood" is a farce. Because brahmins can never tolerate anything which challenges their social order of 4 varnas based on Purusha sukta of rig veda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having said this I would still say I don't have anything personally against Hindus . I find upanishads marvellous and enticing . I have hindu friends . I am just against hindus showing the middle finger to sikhs in punjab. 

Punjab belongs to Sikhs , this much share atleast the sikhs deserve in this country . The fact that sikhs are being robbed of their distinctive identity and their political power by hindus in RSS and other hindutva organization should be a shame for hindus worldwide.

Don't blame sikhs for the rift in hindus and sikhs. Perhaps do a little introspection .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TejS said:

They're good on the surface level, but I don't see much love deep down for each other. Both groups although interact are very segregated from each other. I assume we are diverging exponentially. Both don't really know much about each other's customs and therefore I can only see this cleaving further.

The problem is hindus atleast from the RSS and affiliated organizations have a hard time respecting the distinctive identity of indian religions in general and sikhism in particular.

They go with bizzare comments like "you're born from us" to sikhs , buddhists and jains.

AGREED that many of the philosophical and social customs we see in 4 indian religions were originally from Hindu religion, this still doesn't merit the broadening of chest in a disrespectful way.

It is very rude to try to define others. Let them define themselves. I don't' see myself bullying a ravidasia into accepting that he's a sikh sect.

I am just as infurious when a sikh boastfully and disrespectfully claim that hindus are nothing without sikhs saving them.

We need to enjoy our commonalities and respect our differences in opinion , but i don't see that happening from either side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

The apt representation of relationship of Hindus and Sikhs is like that of Kauravas and Pandavas.

Hindus = Kurus

Sikhs = Pandavas (5) 

Both were cousins, but kurus always tried to humiliate Pandavas by taking their throne , eating their share of inheritance , and humilating them and their women.

Kurus were more in number and had more power and support of sages and the like , had more resources than Pandavas.

But God was in support of Pandavas and we know how it ended with the kurus.

As kurus did to pandus , so are the Hindus did/ still doing to Sikhs. 

"Muh pe bhaai , peeth peeche kasaai" 

Everyone is aware of RSS agenda.

I believe mahabharat is not an epic of past but of future to come . That would explain why it had weapons resembling modern day nuclear weapons .

 

Ok lets forget about Hindus and Sikhs for a moment. Hindu nationalist organizations like to make up stuff out of thin air , like "dharmic brotherhood" , a uniting feeling of Indian born religions - Hindus , Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains.

Sikhism is still a child if one looks at religions based on their age, so one should see Hindus interaction with Buddhists and Jains. 

Pushyamitra Shunga, ruler of Shunga empire , who was a brahmin himself ordered the destruction of buddhist monasteries and nalanda and taxila , and rewarded anyone who would come with the head of a buddhist monk.

Jains were massacred similary and their temples destroyed.

So this "dharmic brotherhood" is a farce. Because brahmins can never tolerate anything which challenges their social order of 4 varnas based on Purusha sukta of rig veda.

The analogy is so true! Great introspection man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's no debate that all Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to "Rehras Sahib" by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? I agree doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib as they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • There's no debate that all Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to "Rehras Sahib" by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? I agree doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib as they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • Uncle, realistically are you gonna challenge it in real life? I could fully jhatka and eat a steak wearing Bana bilkul tere samne but on God you could do nothing about that 😂
    • Flintstone Saab, can't you type in one message? Or must you drop the full Godfather trilogy with every response, minimum 3 responses? 1) They don't jhatka cows at Hazur Sahib because it's in a country called "India", in a state called "Maharashtra" - and beef is strictly illegal there 2) I said a quote from Adi/Dasam Granth saying "you can't eat beef" - "protection of cows" could be Maharaj talking about defending them for Hindus, same reason we do Aarti-Aarta. If u reference a quote, u gotta say the context of the verse. Otherwise there are verses in SGGS Ji which seemingly tell you to convert to Islam; of course that's not what Maharaj is saying but without context many quotes from Baani seem misleading 3) Why does 90% of your "evidence" come from living people, like "the head of Taruna Dal" or "Baba Pala Singh" - very rarely (like less than 10%) of it is from the Gurus' direct words. Do you realise that these people are humans with flaws/bias? Maharaj ended the line of human Gurus for a reason 4) Funnily enough, even Budha Dal's maryada in the Sundar gutka does not ban beef. If individual Akaalis taboo it, that doesn't mean it's the actual hukam lol 5) You mention Naamdharis guarding cows but they are also vegetarians who do not carry a kirpan and say Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not a Guru - using them as an example is funny 😂   6) Bro who uses "diapers" and "mate" in the same sentence? 😂 Man really tried sounding like Andrew Tate with the British/American accent mix 7) So you're about 30 years old and still beefing strangers online? Brooooo where's your MOTHER, did Aunty Ji never shout you away from ur keyboard? "Oy Flentstone puttar, thalle aa hun, roti ban gyi!!!!" 8 ) Wait since you're some Uncle, how do you balance work life with ur keyboard warrior shift? Or do u just sit vailah at home, like unemployed? SERIOUS QUESTION: Is your account rank on this forum the only thing on your CV ?😂😂😂  9) Can you imagine Maharaj condoning you calling me names like "mughal"? You keep reading about these "heads of Taruna Dal" but you need to google "Guru Nanak Dev Ji's teachings on kindness and anger" instead - you're basically trying to solve degree level maths equations when you can't even understand "1 + 1 = 2"  (prediction - I bet he's gonna respond debating one little detail of this post like my joke about accents, but fully miss the bigger picture, or get upset again. He also will likely reference another "sant" or author, or pull a random quote completely out of context😂)
    • ਕੇਵਲ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮੁ ਮਨਿ ਵਸਿਆ ਨਾਮੇ ਹੀ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਪਾਈ ॥ Kaeval Raam Naam Man Vasiaa Naamae Hee Mukath Paaee || केवल राम नामु मनि वसिआ नामे ही मुकति पाई ॥ The Naam, the Name of the Lord alone abides in the mind; and through the Naam, the Name of the Lord, one finds liberation.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use