Jump to content

Aesthetics & Vanity.


Gagan1995
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, MahadrasSingh said:

Interesting, I literally thought they must've been panjabis singing dogri geetah, even the instruments style and the videography scream 2000s panjab. 

True! I understood the geet very clearly, dogri is probably just a dialect! Im from doab, and most people in my city are from malwa, and I have trouble comprehending what they say at times, but these dogri songs gave me no problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Preeet said:

True! I understood the geet very clearly, dogri is probably just a dialect! Im from doab, and most people in my city are from malwa, and I have trouble comprehending what they say at times, but these dogri songs gave me no problems.

Even dogs are better than DOGRAS , am I right........................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iv been on a train from Punjab to Maharastra and once your near Delhi people do start looking different! I think up to Delhi i saw many "nice" looking people, after Delhi people did start looking different, and i don't mean skinny people but their faces and features were different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That train journey was terrible! never again! the toilets were the most filthy thing iv seen in my life and the smell was sickening, its been half a year but my stomach turns when ever i remember it!   You can catch a disease on that train. got on the train at 9 am and reached there around 9pm the next day!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎7‎/‎16‎/‎2018 at 6:51 PM, TejS said:

This is not the case at all. Punjabis, according to David Reich's study are pretty much homogenized when it comes to genetics, and we are all composed of the following genetic components: Steppe nomads (Aryans) + Iranian Neolithic farmers + Indigenous hunterers and gatherers. We do not have any Mughal/Turkic blood. None at all. 

Also, there's no such thing as our mother's side being indigineous. According to mtDNA (haplogroup passed on maternally) frequencies in Punjabis, almost 2/3 of us have our maternal heritage coming from West Eurasia. The whole concept of the male invader raping the female local is absurd. It was a collective mix. Think of it like an ancient United States, where people slowly mixed among each other.  

Ok. But Aryans and Iranians were also invaders. Or at least not indigenous.

And since Punjabis are some part indigenous, my point still stands. That we should not look down upon the indigenous. 

Btw, why do you think aryans are steppe nomads (which wouldn't that make them mongols, which the Mughals were?)

I think it makes more sense that aryans were Iranians because. The aryans had to travel through iran to get to india anyways from the steppes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

Ok. But Aryans and Iranians were also invaders. Or at least not indigenous.

And since Punjabis are some part indigenous, my point still stands. That we should not look down upon the indigenous. 

Who are you describing as indigenous? Dravidians? I hope you realize that the Iranian Neolithic Farmers were Dravidians. They were also "invaders". Or are you talking about the Australoid tribals, who "invaded" from Africa. Which population is indigenous?

Quote

Btw, why do you think aryans are steppe nomads (which wouldn't that make them mongols, which the Mughals were?)

The Aryans were steppe nomads. Haplogroups from burial sites prove this. The Mongols who are Turkic invaded the Eurasian steppe after descending from the Altai mountains and therefore displacing/mixing in with the the original "Aryan" population - the Uyghurs in China are an example of an Aryan/Mongol mix.

Quote

I think it makes more sense that aryans were Iranians because. The aryans had to travel through iran to get to india anyways from the steppes

The Aryans did not travel through Iran to get to India. The Aryans originated in the the Pontic-Caspian steppe and they descended down from there and reached Central Asia (the Hindu Kush), and they then split off into two distinct populations (the Indo-Aryans and the Iranics). Here is a map outlining all populations entering South Asia (the Yamnaya pastoralists are the Aryans, the Iranian agriculturists are Dravidians and the Indian hunter-gatherers are Australoid tribals):

aryan-migration.jpg?quality=80&strip=all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use