Jump to content

Ustat-the main reason behind success of baba culture


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

These scholar kathavachaks speak for hours but their parchar is weak.

I go to budha dal chhauni near Ludhiana. Baba Joginder Singh is always absorbed in Naam.He isn't a scholar. He doesn't read books.

Due to his immense bhagti, his simple words hv immense power.

Just talking to him for few minutes, I feel closer to God and my sikhi gets stronger.

There's some vibration thing some people seem to get from bhagti. I don't know how it works but it's really powerful. Just being around it has an affect on people who aren't closed to these things. 

As I'm writing this I'm also realising that it's similar to what the people who become shardaloos of dera babay sometimes say?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

There r hundreds of historical references of Singhs eating meat. These "scholar" kathavachaks totally ignore these references and never bring these references in front of sangat. They fear if they speak even slightly in favour of meat, they will loose their future katha contracts as majority of Sangat these days is against meat and is vegetarian.

Dallysingh veerji

What do u make of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

There r hundreds of historical references of Singhs eating meat. These "scholar" kathavachaks totally ignore these references and never bring these references in front of sangat. They fear if they speak even slightly in favour of meat, they will loose their future katha contracts as majority of Sangat these days is against meat and is vegetarian.

Dallysingh veerji

What do u make of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

There r hundreds of historical references of Singhs eating meat. These "scholar" kathavachaks totally ignore these references and never bring these references in front of sangat. They fear if they speak even slightly in favour of meat, they will loose their future katha contracts as majority of Sangat these days is against meat and is vegetarian.

Dallysingh veerji

What do u make of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

There r hundreds of historical references of Singhs eating meat. These "scholar" kathavachaks totally ignore these references and never bring these references in front of sangat. They fear if they speak even slightly in favour of meat, they will loose their future katha contracts as majority of Sangat these days is against meat and is vegetarian.

Dallysingh veerji

What do u make of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

There r hundreds of historical references of Singhs eating meat. These "scholar" kathavachaks totally ignore these references and never bring these references in front of sangat. They fear if they speak even slightly in favour of meat, they will loose their future katha contracts as majority of Sangat these days is against meat and is vegetarian.

What is to be gained by talking about/promoting meat ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Question is not about meat. Question is that scholars shud be honest students of history. U can't just burn or ignore historical books or documents that u personally don't agree with.

I don't see how mentioning meat is important. If someone does katha, then they would choose to focus on important points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use