Jump to content

Where Is Our Anakh? Why Do Killers Of 84 Go Unpunished ?


sat
 Share

Recommended Posts

If every single one of you reading this thread, and every single one of you writing posts in here (including myself) decided to absord the personality, vision, and spirit of that immortal revolution who we affectionaly call Sant Baba Jarnail Singh Jee Khalsa Bhindranwale, ਕਿਸੀ ਮਾਂ ਦੇ ਪੁੱਤ ਵਿਚ ਇੰਨੀ ਹਿੱਮਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਿ ਸਾਂਨੂੰ ਹੱਥ ਪਾਵੇ !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is more important than Anakh. However, right now we think some other Sikh will do the right thing than we trying to do it. We are not following sant baba Jarnail Singh bhindrawale's directions.

Not even him, we aren't following what our Gurus taught us.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WJKK WJKF

Nothing will ever happen because the majority of "Sikhs" will stay caste divided, especially in the Panjab and India. The ones that don't, are too little in number. If we all was Tyar bar Tyar like how our Guru Gobind Singh intended and lived the one rehat without squabbling with each other. We could make something happen. But in reality, the real religion and gains of people around the world is Politics and Money. The true religion has been forgotten and is used as a vehicle to reach a to b, never thinking about z (mukti)

We can still be united with different Rehats, like both Taksal and AKJ did in 1978. I know some people would really want to do something but they just can't. But I do find it very disgraceful when I see a Sikh with Gatra and Kirpan holding up a sign saying, "Give us Justice" (I am influenced by Jugraj Singh by the way). When you have the Kirpan you can get your own justice for the Panth. Satwant and Beant never protested a picked up a sign saying,"Sikhs want Justice". The thing is people don't really want to do anything, (most not all)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is really shocking is how few people give any help to the victims of 84. This something you do not need any weapons training for. The Sants and Badals will happily give help to non Sikhs but will not help the Shaheed parwars or 84 victims.Sarbat da Bhalla does not mean you do not help your own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can still be united with different Rehats, like both Taksal and AKJ did in 1978. I know some people would really want to do something but they just can't. But I do find it very disgraceful when I see a Sikh with Gatra and Kirpan holding up a sign saying, "Give us Justice" (I am influenced by Jugraj Singh by the way). When you have the Kirpan you can get your own justice for the Panth. Satwant and Beant never protested a picked up a sign saying,"Sikhs want Justice". The thing is people don't really want to do anything, (most not all)

WJKK WJKF

Yea I agree, however the difference in rehat should be based on personal opinion and not different interpretation of ithias, Sikhi Granths and the Shiri Guru Granth Sahib as then we end up going down the road of religions like Islam and how people say "they interpretate it like this and we interpretate it like that" which I think then looks real shabby.

But yea your right, the Kirpan is not just a ceremonial sword.

Really, it's only from the movement and support of NRI Sikhs that have shone some light on 84, and of course groups of individuals within Panjab who re true sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use