Jump to content

Question


Singhni82
 Share

Recommended Posts

"Again i will have to reiterate that you seem to contradict yourself on many points. You start off by saying that "sikhs guru's were male for a reason" but then later on agree with me that the Guru was not the body but the gyaan within that body. The two statements cannot coeixst. EIther you accept the Guru to exist only in the form of gyaan or you can make the Guru out to be a gender specific human being."

Yea I saw that one! lol... my bad

Gender specificity....hmmmmm....that poses a hole new set of problems in my beleif system!

Im faced with a dillema----

The divine message i agree is the guru, but according to my beleif system the "guru" was created by the vessel itself.

couldnt the vessels be capable of producing "gyaan"?

????????????????????????????Im starting off on the wrong foot! --- I still dont know what Sikhi regards as the "sacred"??????????????????????????????????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use