Jump to content

Abortion/unprotected Sex


Recommended Posts

Does anyone know what view or positions is taken by Sikhi for the use of emergency hormonal contraception (EHC)? An example is a situation where a couple, during intercourse, realise their method of contraception (such as a condom) has failed...

You can purchase EHC, as a method to prevent implantation and pregnancy at that stage (i.e. the instant the sperm fertilises the egg).

In this situation, is it OK to use such methods.

If its banned in sikhism, what of those of us in the medical field who are involved in the supply of such items to women? We can object to the supply of these under a religious clause, but there are those who would argue that it is our DUTY to carry out such tasks as a medic, just as it is the duty of a soldier to protect (and kill if neccessary) their country.

And lastly, what of those women who are saldy the victim of rape? Would the use of EHC in this situation be a valid one within Sikhi?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think people are too embaressed to answer this question!

Il give you the answer i think, Sikhi does not permit abortion as children are a gift from God but abortion is only allowed in the extremest of extreme cases (ie: either mother or child will die etc.)

146418[/snapback]

I disagree to even this extent.

How do we know this baby/mother is not meant to die at that point? They may have paid of their Lekha and now are ready to pass over in Akaal Purakhs game.

If we truly live by the Hukham, then we dont play god, we let him carry on as he pleases and accept what happened.

Wasnt it Sant Gurbachan Singh jee? who was injured severly in a car accident? and when in hospital was told they need to cut his kesh to operate. He clearly stated, i rather die then have my kesh cut so i can live.

Maharaj plans what happens, he plans who lives, who dies, everything to when we go to the toilet, therefore who are we to interfere?

THe answer lies in Bani, read and understand and you will be given the answer in your ardaas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lowest of the low singhni
Yup I agree..

Sex is ment to be a way to show your love as well as procreation. If u jsut use sex for its pleasure, its kaam, lust :)

Guru Ji warns us form lust. If we try to combat lust, dont haf sex for fun, then the quesotin of contraception cant even pop up!!!

..simple

146431[/snapback]

true. it's about self-control and love for Maharaj. the principle is simple, but implementing it is harder. we should implement it anyway. ardas helps.

stay away from this stuff ...

not so sure about the rape part though. we don't know the weird and wonderful ways of Maharaj's hukam.

~l~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a comment about those who say avoid lust...

Are you saying avoid lust with ones partner or lust from others apartf from your parnter?

If you are saying avoid lust with your partner...isnt that contradictory...?

Obviously being totally sex mad with your partner isnt good...but we are allowed to have a "sex" life with our partners...thats the basis if marrage...we are allowed it within the boundaries of a family life.

Arent we told NOT to become ascetic?

My question therefore is, if its within the bounds of a married relationship...if you and your partner use contraception...within that reltionship...whats the issue there?

If you are using contraception outside of your married life..thats bad.

Secondly, the idea of the morning after pill is that you use it when you have had an accident...i.e. in the case of a split condom.

In that case, would it be correct for me to supply this to my patients or not?

From a personal viewpoint I have no issues with this...but if its found to be against SIkhi then it IS an issue for me.

Now, the idea of foeticide is bad, and we all know we are not allowed to undertake abortions.

But what about the morning after pill...it works, in theory, the second the sperm fertilises the egg...some call that the moment of implantation and "pregnancy"..in that case and if we belive abortions are not allowed...then it comes back to the rape issue.....like most rules in various religions, the rules are blanket rules and apply to everything...so in that case, it would also not be allowed.

I guess there is no right or wrong answer....if you have an answer, PLEASE back up your views with quotes from BabaJi rather then your own viewpoints.

But like I said, I guess this sort of situation wasnt planned for hundreds of years ago so it open to interpretation from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In reply to K_51NGH, what you are saying is to avoid sex for pleasure in a married relationship and only "do" it when you have kids.

Are you saying that we should only have sex with our partners for, anywhere between 1-10 times during our married life (say 50-60 years)?!?!?!

With all due espect, I seriously DOUBT many of us would be able to deal with that.

As I said, I'd agree with the issue of TOO much sex.

But then it is clearly stated we MUST not live a life of an ascetic.

By having NO SEX in a reltionship, are we not in part leading that sort of life?

So, if we assume sexal relationships within marrage between partners is OK...then surely we should no jsut assume an attitude of..."ok, if it happens (women gets pregnant) then its Gods will"...its akin to sayin.." OK if I walk in the middle of the road along oncoming traffic its Gods will that I die or not".

My own personal view is that within ones married life, sex is OK with your partner ALONE. An excess of anything is bad, espicially sex...so sex as and when neccessary.

But it all about taking responsibility, so if you use contraception what is the problem?

Just my own views. I'm sure you'll all disagree though...but its VERY good and certainly positive to see responses like K_51NGHs...its a very noble thing to say and indeed to do...I just wonder how many of us can actually stick to such a goal...i DOUBT many of us at all..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it should all come down to personal choice.

Especially in the case of rape, one rule will not cover all instances. If the woman feels severely violated and is determined to terminate the pregnancy, then it is her choice--she will have to live with the consequenses either way. I strongly do not believe that she should be denied the right to make that decision, especially by men (sorry if I offend).

Now as for God's Will... if we are to take the stance that we can't interfere in a responsible adult couple's "accident" because it is God's Will that that has happened, then technically, how can we treat even a rash, if it is God's Will that we have a rash, or it is God's Will that we have cancer, or God's Will that our four month old child should catch measles and die?

Seeya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manchester Sikhi.. you miss the point.. All-info explains a lot in his/hers post..

Basically you can have sex in marriage nobody is saying you can't, and nobody can say you can only have it X amount of times.. You just can't have sex outside marriage..

You cant use contraception, in marriage or outside marriage..

It is left up to your judgement how often to have sex, and some ppl only have sex when trying to have a baby, some rehit maryada's state that.. But truthfully majority of ppl have sex in marriage when trying for a baby and to show affection..

But you must use your head and not have sex too much and get sex mad and too lustful as it will only enhance Kaam, 1 of the 5 evils which we are trying to surpress and get rid of.. But if you do find yourself always thinking of sex and having sex often.. you should honestly be doing more paat, and simran..

Pul chuck maaf

Gurfateh.

p.s.

And the abortion thing.. you cant have abortion and once again you can't use contraception.. Everything is in the will of god.. if a baby was meant to be born, then it should, if the woman carrying the baby was not meant to make it, then thats gods will.. But you can't tell 100% that if you have an abortion on the grounds that the woman may die.. that the woman will die.. she may not.. again the will of god.. God created us and everything..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use