Jump to content

When Will Sikhs In Punjab Learn ?


Guest PunjabSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Are sikhs in punjab different than elsewhere? If a thread says "sikhs in punjab", does that mean nothing else can be mentioned? I've been born and raised in punjab, but now living in US, what will you term me as? dont we have enough divisions based on caste and jathebandis that we ant one more based on country...... Well by doing so, we are playing in hands of ppl who want to create more divisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why did you leave Punjab? For money? If you were worried about Sikhi, you would never leave Punjab, where Sikhi Parchaar is needed. You left Punjab and now trying to show that you have any love for Sikhi and Sikhs of Punjab. You left Punjab in hands of Rashtriya Sikh Sangat and others and now giving lectures to us. If you have a little bit love for Sikhi, come back to Punjab and preach Sikhism. You are much needed here in Punjab. You are more than welcome.

Are sikhs in punjab different than elsewhere?

They are different to a few of Sikhs living abroad. Sikhs in Punjab do not hate others. Sikhs in Punjab are facing threats by anti-Sikh people. People like you are just watching 'Tamaasha' and criticising Sikhs of Punjab. Aap Na Denh Churru Bhar Paani. Teh Nindain Jeh Ganga Aani (Sri Guru Granth Sahib).

If a thread says "sikhs in punjab", does that mean nothing else can be mentioned?

What is logic? If a thread is about Punjab, which is an obvious part of India, why the word 'Indian' angered you? You do not dare to speak against those using bad words for Punjabi Sikhs. Kee Gal? Punjab Da Namak Kha Ke Hun Haraam Karan Te Tul Gye Ho?

I've been born and raised in punjab, but now living in US, what will you term me as?

A Punjabi, who left his mother for money. I think you did not go there as a preacher of Sikhism.

dont we have enough divisions based on caste and jathebandis that we ant one more based on country......

A Pakistani Sikh army men will kill an Indian Sikh armymen if there is any battle. We are divided. But you forgot one point. The Panth Khalsa was born in India. All the five beloved ones were Indians. So original Khalsa was 'Indian'. Yes, we are divided. But it is not Indian Sikhs, who created divisions. The groups like 'Pakistani Sikhs', 'American Sikhs', 'Canadian Sikhs', 'White Sikhs', 'Black Sikhs' came later. :T: We already existed when such Sikh groups came.

Well by doing so, we are playing in hands of ppl who want to create more divisions.

Yes, you are playing in hands of those, who want to create more divisions, more political parties in Punjab, more 'Jathas', more posts showing hatred for India and its Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you forgot one point. The Panth Khalsa was born in India. All the five beloved ones were Indians. So original Khalsa was 'Indian'. Yes, we are divided. But it is not Indian Sikhs, who created divisions.

..sir first of all khalsa was not born

...because if someone is born than it bound 2 die one day thats the nature

..Khalsa was made by the Guru Shaibs

...second Khalsa was not indian

...There was no country called India until the britsh

The groups like 'Pakistani Sikhs', 'American Sikhs', 'Canadian Sikhs', 'White Sikhs', 'Black Sikhs' came later. :T: We already existed when such Sikh groups came.

..what

..........this not what is meant by divisions in panth

...its justed simpling refering to a particular sikh's resident

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..r u aware of the so called the indian's did to sikhs

recap from

...Ghandi calling Sri guru Gobind singh a lost saint

...then in the process of creating states on linguistic bases , punjab was left out

...Indra Ghani was quoted a saying "he (Jawaharlal Nehru) was strongly opposed to the idea of a Punjabi state"

...water from the rivers of punjab flow to non-riparian Haryana state

..but haryana a riparian sate to the river Yamuna refuse to share its riparian rigts with punjab

.......punjab a state where 95% of the land is cultivated have a requirement of 52.5MAF

...but the centre has distributed water to rajasthan,Haryana and Delhi and the punjab the only riparian state gets a mere 5MAF

...the Riparian right are based on the principle that only those areas which are subject to flood damage by the river have riarian rights

...i could carry on but i think u get the picture

..maybe later on i'll put more kaarname of the so called indians :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HaRdKaUrWaRrIoRz

..r u aware of the so called the indian's did to sikhs

recap from

...Ghandi calling Sri guru Gobind singh a lost saint

...then in the process of creating states on linguistic bases , punjab was left out

...Indra Ghani was quoted a saying "he (Jawaharlal Nehru) was strongly opposed to the idea of a Punjabi state"

...water from the rivers of punjab flow to non-riparian Haryana state

..but haryana a riparian sate to the river Yamuna refuse to share its riparian rigts with punjab

.......punjab a state where 95% of the land is cultivated have a requirement of 52.5MAF

...but the centre has distributed water to rajasthan,Haryana and Delhi and the punjab the only riparian state gets a mere 5MAF

...the Riparian right are based on the principle that only those areas which are subject to flood damage by the river have riarian rights

...i could carry on but i think u get the picture

..maybe later on i'll put more kaarname of the so called indians :D

just by bringin in divisions among sikhs, amrit u have lost all credibility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use