Jump to content

Another Against Sikhi


Recommended Posts

Guest Bass Singh

VJKK VJKF!

I EMAILED THE WEBSITE AND I GOT THIS REPLY BACK!:-

Dear Bass,

Thank you for your e-mail. I apologise if the article on Sikhism offended you. But perhaps there should be a few things kept in mind by yourself.

1. The point of the article and other articles on false religions is to show that all religions don't lead to the same god. This is the very reason why there are different religions.

2. All religion would not be correct as not only besides laws of morality, the very presentation of their perspective deities is wooly different.

3. I had believed that the research done by the website on Sikhism was very fair in regards to judging it by the standard of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Guru Nanak was neither judged by his personal life nor his moral character, but rather by the claims that he made for himself and his theory that the god he spoke to and the One True Lord that revealed Himself to humanity are one and the same god. The point of the article was to show that Guru Nanak's supposition was wrong.

What claims that Guru Nanak made did I misrepresent? If there were Sikh beliefs improperly worded, I would be more than happy to hear about them. The main issue at stake was to contrast Sikhism with Islam, showing that the two have nothing in common. If you believe there is some similarity, I would be more than glad to dialogue with you. Thank you for your time and visiting the website.

The Lord guide you!

Abu Ja`far al-Hanbali

ANYONE KNOW WHAT I SHOULD RITE BACK??

VJKK VJKF!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1. The point of the article and other articles on false religions is to show that all religions don't lead to the same god. This is the very reason why there are different religions.

2. All religion would not be correct as not only besides laws of morality, the very presentation of their perspective deities is wooly different.

3. I had believed that the research done by the website on Sikhism was very fair in regards to judging it by the standard of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Guru Nanak was neither judged by his personal life nor his moral character, but rather by the claims that he made for himself and his theory that the god he spoke to and the One True Lord that revealed Himself to humanity are one and the same god. The point of the article was to show that Guru Nanak's supposition was wrong.

4 - What claims that Guru Nanak made did I misrepresent? If there were Sikh beliefs improperly worded, I would be more than happy to hear about them. The main issue at stake was to contrast Sikhism with Islam, showing that the two have nothing in common. If you believe there is some similarity, I would be more than glad to dialogue with you. Thank you for your time and visiting the website.

The Lord guide you!

Abu Ja`far al-Hanbali

ANYONE KNOW WHAT I SHOULD RITE BACK??

VJKK VJKF!

1 - How many Gods are their? Sikhs believe there is one God so did the muslims (but he doesn't)

2 - It's muslims that claim Sikism is similar to Islam and not the other way round! (provide the link that i've posted before)

3 - Mohammed claimed he'd spoken to Gabriel and Mohammed was illiterate so how could he have memorised ALL the verses of the Kuran? Guru Nanak recieved the word of God via God himself not a go-between like Mohammed did! Calling Guru Nanak false is offensive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VJKK VJKF!

I EMAILED THE WEBSITE AND I GOT THIS REPLY BACK!:-

Dear Bass,

Thank you for your e-mail. I apologise if the article on Sikhism offended you. But perhaps there should be a few things kept in mind by yourself.

1. The point of the article and other articles on false religions is to show that all religions don't lead to the same god. This is the very reason why there are different religions.

2. All religion would not be correct as not only besides laws of morality, the very presentation of their perspective deities is wooly different.

3. I had believed that the research done by the website on Sikhism was very fair in regards to judging it by the standard of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Guru Nanak was neither judged by his personal life nor his moral character, but rather by the claims that he made for himself and his theory that the god he spoke to and the One True Lord that revealed Himself to humanity are one and the same god. The point of the article was to show that Guru Nanak's supposition was wrong.

What claims that Guru Nanak made did I misrepresent? If there were Sikh beliefs improperly worded, I would be more than happy to hear about them. The main issue at stake was to contrast Sikhism with Islam, showing that the two have nothing in common. If you believe there is some similarity, I would be more than glad to dialogue with you. Thank you for your time and visiting the website.

The Lord guide you!

Abu Ja`far al-Hanbali

ANYONE KNOW WHAT I SHOULD RITE BACK??

VJKK VJKF!

PERhaps u shud email the <banned word filter activated> once again. He called the Gurus "pretenders" and "false". but cleverly he avoided bringing that part up in his reply to your email. if he was trying to show that sikhsim and islam are different thats ok, but he went further than that he attaked sikhism by calling the gurus "false" and "pretenders".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PRITAM SINGH KHALSA

http://www.angelfire.com/indie/nanak/

Look how cleverly they used the sign found on Iraqi flag to be similar to the Khanda..

lol.

Iranian flag veera!

VJKK VJKF!

I EMAILED THE WEBSITE AND I GOT THIS REPLY BACK!:-

Dear Bass,

Thank you for your e-mail. I apologise if the article on Sikhism offended you. But perhaps there should be a few things kept in mind by yourself.

1. The point of the article and other articles on false religions is to show that all religions don't lead to the same god. This is the very reason why there are different religions.

2. All religion would not be correct as not only besides laws of morality, the very presentation of their perspective deities is wooly different.

3. I had believed that the research done by the website on Sikhism was very fair in regards to judging it by the standard of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Guru Nanak was neither judged by his personal life nor his moral character, but rather by the claims that he made for himself and his theory that the god he spoke to and the One True Lord that revealed Himself to humanity are one and the same god. The point of the article was to show that Guru Nanak's supposition was wrong.

What claims that Guru Nanak made did I misrepresent? If there were Sikh beliefs improperly worded, I would be more than happy to hear about them. The main issue at stake was to contrast Sikhism with Islam, showing that the two have nothing in common. If you believe there is some similarity, I would be more than glad to dialogue with you. Thank you for your time and visiting the website.

The Lord guide you!

Abu Ja`far al-Hanbali

ANYONE KNOW WHAT I SHOULD RITE BACK??

VJKK VJKF!

Ive seen this from the beginning of my Sikhi. Muslims always will do this. They wish to even mislead one away from Sikhi. They are liars and cheats as a majority.

They all tell me those things in my debates with them. The smart ones just stop all of a sudden and thats because they dont want to lie and then I politely part ways with them. That is a real muslim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use