Jump to content

Why Be A Babbar And The Rest Which I Do Not Know Of?


RajanSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

there were gursikhs who kept links with all the jathebandis and those who did not and associated themselfs with just one jathebandi which was not the khalsa panth. you see this today. where there is now a thought amongst youth that amrit 4rm one amrit sanchaar or apparent jathebandi is somehow better than another, which is just pathetic. because then u dnt think ur taking amrit 4rm the panj pyare of guru ji but of panj gursikhs of the apparent jatha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there were gursikhs who kept links with all the jathebandis and those who did not and associated themselfs with just one jathebandi which was not the khalsa panth. you see this today. where there is now a thought amongst youth that amrit 4rm one amrit sanchaar or apparent jathebandi is somehow better than another, which is just pathetic. because then u dnt think ur taking amrit 4rm the panj pyare of guru ji but of panj gursikhs of the apparent jatha.

to be honesst i dont really see that i think the youth are united if anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talkin about?Zaffarwal was nice to everyone during that time and many jujahroo's saw him as a gursikh but he played a game with the sikh panth and went to the indian side. KCF singhs of zaffarwal were true to the movement and many of them died for khalistan, does it mean KCF zaffarwal group was bad, NOO. Singhs have been shaheed from zaffarwal KCF,they trusted zaffarwal, they just didn't know what he was playing. About AKJ and babbar khalsa, there were many singhs who weren't AKJ and still joined babbar khalsa like singhs from kastiwal. The singh on bottom was shaheed and he was part of KCF Zaffarwal and his brother as well. About the char jujahroo jatha bandi, they didn't fight or break up, it was divided in to areas.

NO WAY! Is that true? We are both talking about Wassan Singh Zaffarwal, currently in Pakistan, arent we? I never knew he collaborated with the Indian government! Where did you find that out from?!!! Can you prove it?

On the subject of the Babbars: there is a lot of bad things written about them, not in newspapers (to be expected), but in books about the Sikh Freedom movement. I have read that their founder, Sukhdev Singh Babbar , QUOTE: "tried to kill Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Bhindranwale, and as a result were responsible for his forced ejection from Guru Nanak Niwas (part of Sri Harmandir Sahib complex) on the night of 15th December 1983."

"Accused of deserting Bhindranwale, in fact they were never with him. At one point, they were ASKING for arms against him"

Can somebody please tell me whether this is TRUE? How could an organisation committed to freedom for the Sikhs try to KILL BHINDRANWALE?

At another point it states that "the Babbars, which was a group that numbered thrity at the time, escaped Darbar Sahib on the night of 1st June (1984), before the serious fighting began"

I HAVE WANTED TO KNOW FOR A LONG TIME WHETEHER THIS IS TRUE OR NOT. Speaking to AKJ members doesnt help, because they idolise Sukhdev Singh Babbar and would never tolerate such a thought.

On the face of it it looks like there could be some truth in it: apparently the Babbars were formed solely for defending the Panth against the fake nirankaris (Shaheed Bhai Fauja Singh and his jatha made a big sacrifice for the kaum), but never for Khalistan. Many Babbar Khalsa members were former Naxalites, meaning they were communist and saw Hindustan as their motherland which they would never tolerate breaking up. WADAWA SINGH BABBAR is anmed as a fomer naxalite.

Also, I read a leaflet printed by babbar Khalsa/AKJ which said that most people have heard of the sacrifice that Sant Bhindranwale made for his kaum, but they dont know much about the contribution made by Babbar Khalsa.

ALTHOUGH I ADMIT THIS WASNT AN INFLAMMATORY STATEMENT, it offended me that the author should have to denigrate Bhindranwale in this sense.

SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME IF WHAT I HAVE READ IS TRUE! I DONT KNOW WHO TO TRUST ANYMORE!

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa!

Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jarnail singh bhindrawale called sukdev singh babbar " shucha sukha" as in truthfull sukha the storys about trying to murder sant ji or just rumors that are trying to split up the panth and call divisions sant bhindrawale talked about these kind of antics alot in his speeches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jarnail singh bhindrawale called sukdev singh babbar " shucha sukha" as in truthfull sukha the storys about trying to murder sant ji or just rumors that are trying to split up the panth and call divisions sant bhindrawale talked about these kind of antics alot in his speeches

Thats good.

But what about Zaffarwal? Was he really an agent? IT CANT BE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not sure if he's an agent or not.......i've also heard tat zafarwal was in the jail with ac room n also tv.......is the same zafarwal or some1 else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use