Jump to content

Giving Money When Matha Teking


Jassika
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think it would make more sense to make contributions to the gurdwara somewhere else (such as by the entry of the prayer hall with eyecatching posters explaining lil facts about how much the money helps) instead in front of the Guru Granth Sahib.

Can someone please explain why I am wrong?

I just don't like the idea of including money which is a worldy material thing because at the gurdwara I like to think of a heavenly place without a need of money. and money to me more represents the fake world buuut its true there are a lot worse distractions that go on at gurdwaras too like the "show offs" in the sangat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest peacemaker

I agree that giving money inside the darbar hall can be a distraction and I always felt that if you need to give money, it should be before you enter the hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Amrik$ingh

i think its thats true aswell...you lose focus on why your going into the darbar sahib...not to give money to your Guru...because thats no what its about

man..im losing my touch..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Amrik$ingh

by ardass deosnt work by giving money to your Guru...its from within you..i can give you loads of money and wish for all the luck inda world..it dont work like that.

its like me throwing money into a well.....and asking for good things

..giving money ain't an excuse for your ardass to become reality..your have to work for what you want in life by the help from the Supreme Lord

money is simply helps the Gurdwara to pay the bills..as the all the sangat contributes...langar resources..gas/ water/ electricity/kirtan..gurdwara projects ..other types of seva

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I feel like I'm bowing to the money instead of Maharaj...there was this one gurduara which kpt the golak on the side o maharaj versus the front, so after people would bow they would srop the money in...

That made more sense, because now people were actually bowing to Guru Granth Sahib, nothing in between, instead of the golak....

But in the end, the bowing comes from within. If you're distracted anyway, it doesn't matter where the golak is, you're still makig a joke of bowing to maharaj.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we aint christian - they have them money box things at the front

plus wen we do Matha Tehk we givin money like Dasma heesa (giv 10% outta ur profits) 2 share wiv Sangat!! thats the whole point of givin contribution!!!!

no point givin contribution in if u aint givin it through the golak!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I feel like I'm bowing to the money instead of Maharaj...there was this one gurduara which kpt the golak on the side o maharaj versus the front, so after people would bow they would srop the money in...

That made more sense, because now people were actually bowing to Guru Granth Sahib, nothing in between, instead of the golak....

so i guess when sangat matha teeks after ardaas we just matha tek to each other rolleyes.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use